Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
3.36s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1999
United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893, 902 (1997), cert. granted, No. 97-1943 (Jan. 8, 1999), that the “substantial | Cf. 29 C. F. … Accordingly, the Senate Committee’s comment that the “regarded as” prong “ensure[{s]” protection of an individual with “controlled diabetes or epilepsy” under the Act is not inconsistent with the clear
527 U.S. 516Amicus Curiae Brief — Pierre Yassue Nashun Riley, Petitioner v. Pamela Bondi, Attorney General
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 10, 2025
Lubbers, Fail to Comment at Your Own Risk: Does Issue Exhaustion Have a Place in Judicial Review of Rules?, 70 Admin L. … Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 112–114 (1948). The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 701 et seq., allows for judicial review only of “final agency action.” 5 U.S.C. 704.
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Microsoft Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 18, 2018
See Data Protection (Amendment) Act 2003 § 2(b) (Act No. 6/2003) (Ir.) … See, e.g., Balabel v Air India [1988] Ch. 317 (EWCA); McMullen v Kennedy [2007] IEHC 263.
Amicus Curiae Brief — The ERISA Industry Committee, Petitioner v. City of Seattle, Washington
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 18, 2022
Some simply required that employers provide disclosures to state agencies or submit to periodic inspections. Id. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 90-91 (1983).
Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonough v. Smith (No. 18-485)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019
Courts originally determined the length of the lim- itations period in 1983 cases by “seeking state-law analogies for particular § 1983 claims” and choosing the limitations period for the state-law … Wallace, 549 U.S. at 388 (quoting Bay Area Laundry and Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of Cal., 522 U.S. 192, 201 (1997) (brackets in origi- nal)).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Reginald Keith Clark, Petitioner v. Colorado
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 20, 2025
Its supporters attacked the institution, tampering with juries to “clean up” Colorado by incar- 22 cerating and forcibly removing people of color. … This period “left a lasting legacy” in certain areas of Colorado, where racial animus hardened. Delgado, supra at 773.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997
Linde Air Products Co., 339 US. GOS (1950)... ccccccccccccccvveces passim Hearne v. New England Mutual Marine Ins. … The job, then, is one for the court alone, acting in equity.
520 U.S. 17Amicus Curiae Brief — Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Massachusetts
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985
Delta Air Lines, Inc., — U.S. ——, 51 NL passim Teamsters Union v. Oliver, 358 U.S. 283 (1959) 6 Terminal Ass’n v. … any State or political subdivision of a State The House report did not comment on this provision but the Senate report did, stating: The states of Wisconsin and New York, for example, exercise supervision
471 U.S. 724Amicus Curiae Brief — Arkansas Ed. Television Comm'n v. Forbes
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
The act of exclusion of a candidate from a debate is a fatal blow to the candidate's chances on election day. … Because of the enormous cost of purchasing television air time, it is not an answer to remit candidates to purchase time as a substitute for free debate time.
523 U.S. 666Amicus Curiae Brief — Edwards v. Aguillard
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987
Our decision is not made in a vacuum, aor do we write on a clean slate. We must rec_gnize that tie theory of creation is a religious belief. … ‘7 Commentators agree that this avowed purpose is a sham.
482 U.S. 578Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005
Act. … ETSI’s “navigation priority” comment relied on by the Eighth Circuit is dictum. The Supreme Court has fre- quently held that dictum is entitled to only the weight of its own persuasion.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, en 13 Department of the Air Force v. Rose, cece crerrsnssnenssnsnocscet 25 John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., EE a 9 NLRB v. … Freedom of Information Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-570, § 1802, 100 Stat. 3207-48.
537 U.S. 1229Amicus Curiae Brief — Catharine Miller, et al., Petitioners v. Civil Rights Department
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 29, 2025
The couple responded by posting negative comments about Tastries on social 3 media, resulting in hundreds of hateful messages and threats. App.303a-306a, App.381a. … Emps., 585 U.S. 878, 914 (2018) (cleaned up).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Casey v. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania (Nos. 91-902, 91-744)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Such a concept and notion regarding viability, in view of the above comments, appears to be patently unjust, arbitrary and grounded in the illogical as Justice Rehnquist pointed out in his Dissent … This would be a Noble Act, indeed, and an advancement of civilization itself.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2025
The local board of education and the charter school may renew the charter for successive periods as provided in this 12 section.”). … The State adopted a charter schools act in 2017 but did not appropriate funds until 2022. See 2017 Ky. Acts 758; 2022 Ky. Acts 1982.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Friedrichs v. Cal. Teachers Ass'n, 135 S. Ct. 2933 (2015) (No. 14-915)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
While there has been debate about Act 10 as a policy matter, it is undeniable that it has had a public impact. … Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Pena-Rodriguez v. Colorado, 136 S. Ct. 1513 (2016) (No. 15-606)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
The empaneled jury deliberated for a “somewhat lengthy” period of time. Brief for Petitioner 6. … S. 182, 188 (1981) (plurality opinion). 13 “A trial represents an important investment of private and social resources, and it ill serves the important end of finality to wipe the slate clean simply
Amicus Curiae Brief — TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001
Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997) 17 Vornado Air Circulation Sys. v. Duracraft Corp., 58 F.3d 1498 (10th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 1067 (1996) 16, 22, 23 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. … To encourage innova- tion, the inventor of a new and useful advance is given “the exclusive right to practice the invention for a period of years.” Id. at 151.
532 U.S. 23Amicus Curiae Brief — Sereboff v. Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006
Delta Air Lines, Inc., EP Ce iacccecessnsesnrncssntscccscesessesenenecsestensesonnte 10 Varity Corp. v. … Dobbs, Law of Remedies § 4.3(1), at 587-88 (2d ed. 1993); Restatement of Restitution § 160, Comment a, at 641-42 (1936); 1 G.
547 U.S. 356Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 7, 2019
. § 89-4 (limiting opt-out period to 30-day window); R.I. Gen. … Air Transp. Lodge 1984 of Int’l Ass’n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, 590 F.2d 409 (2d Cir. 1978).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.