Documents

Oral argument — Ron Williams v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2009

Well, obviously, Your Honor, he was very good at his job because he received a positive performance evaluation and had a clean record up to this point. So what good is he? … Any act that an employee does that brings discredit upon the department, which obviously drinking in a department vehicle, which is what the other cases they say are different, none of these people, well

Oral argument — Mark Tauscher v. Phoenix Bd. of Realtors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2019

It includes asking live questions of a very skilled, knowledgeable instructor, and asking questions of and commenting upon comments made and questions asked, and experiences shared by the other members … He can simply act like everyone else in the class, and they market this class as beneficial for that point exactly.

Oral argument — Mark Peterson v. City of Yakima

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2023

Was the person acting under a color of state law and did they violate the right? Right. … I think the model instructions, the comments are helpful. I know that there's not a single instruction that instructs how to combine.

Oral argument — United States v. Shipp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2022

So if meetings with jurors in chambers, which will result in their excusal from the panel, is not voir dire, then surely administrative logistical remarks, even about COVID cleaning protocols, should not … And this court should not take the government's comment in oral argument that we all knew, but he can't recall how they knew, as somehow part of the record.

Oral argument — Arce v. Honeywell International Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2025

The district court's dismissal of appellant Linda Arce's claims under both the False Claims Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act can be upheld on the record before this court. … Arce during the discovery period in this case.

Oral argument — Triple Canopy, Inc. v. Secretary of the Air Force

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2021

Secretary of the Air Force Mr. Schaffer Thank you, Your Honor. May it please the Court, Jonathan Schaffer, Counsel for Appellant Triple Canopy. … If you have alcohol, it's illegal with some sections, period. And that changed. And then they said, alcohol is legal, but we're going to tax it.

Oral argument — In re Estate of Gawel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2018

There is a section in the Probate Act for reopening estates that have been closed, decedent estates, but it does not apply to realigning the heirs. … But nothing was being done for that six-month period. It's not just the fact that, you know, there are other attorneys handling the case during that period of time.

Oral argument — De Carvalho v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2021

If the Court agrees with Petitioner that Y.L. is invalid under Chevron, it need not reach the other issues in this case, such as the cat clean. … So, Your Honor, the problem that I can see with that is that the board acts as the Attorney General's designees.

Oral argument — Jeff Hale v. Emerson Electric Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2019

That's what they claim, but they didn't say, this has so many air watts, this has so many air watts, this has so the consumer can compare. … And there is no requirement to prove the elements of fraud under the MMPA, period. All that's required is an unlawful act and an ascertainable loss. And that's what we prove.

Oral argument — Service Employees Internationa v. Trump

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 25, 2020

The case that they rely on primarily is the Air Force case from the D.C. Circuit, where there was an APA claim. But the court, the D.C. … It should have gone through notice and comment.

Oral argument — Jack Kellison v. Dutra Group

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2018

And under the Longshore Act, and under Section 7 of the Administrative Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, and Greenwich Collieries, the true doubt rule was removed. … Also, that claimant didn't come forward with any evidence themselves of air testing or other proof of an injurious exposure situation.

Oral argument — State of New York v. United St

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2020

It's not a notice and comment rulemaking, and it is, even if it were a notice and comment rulemaking, they could change. … And I'm not saying that a court always has to act nationwide under Section 705, but it's authority that it has.

Oral argument — Merit Healthcare Int'l v. Merit Medical Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 9, 2017

I'd like to first address, if I could, your comment, Judge Watford, about Northstar. … You're stuck with liability for a longer period of time. Is that your problem?

Oral argument — Michael Buhl v. Abbott Laboratories

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 9, 2020

And while it may be unpopular, Michael Buell, a Caucasian male, is entitled to the protection of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act based on national origin and race. … In other words, doing exactly what his superiors at Abbott had told him not to do, airing grievances widely and outside of his department. Is that wrong?

Oral argument — Michael Jones v. County of Los Angeles

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2014

So it's not that Rivas would have gone away from that conversation, if you believe the Jones's evidence, thinking, gosh, we still don't know, it's still up in the air. … Kim comment, but he references it as it having been submitted in support of Dr. Wong's motion for summary judgment.

Oral argument — Alma Glisson v. Correctional Medical Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2015

The cleaning of the stoma should have been recorded. If it was that important, it wasn't recorded. As I say, only four times in the first 14 days. … Losing 3 pounds in a short period of time is significant, and they didn't seem to want to address that.

Oral argument — Deasencio v. Tyson Foods

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

I'd like your comment on that. I believe that the definition of work is a threshold issue before you get to the portal act. Here's why. Why? Why is it a threshold? … And when this has been defined, to be sure, to show that these are not hijacked by the portal of portal act. I like your comment.

Oral argument — Center for Biological Diversit v. USFS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 7, 2018

Was the Forest Service, you know, it's Forest Service land, so is there some imputed obligation to clean it up? Is that, because it's your land? … Manufacturers of dry cleaning equipment. Right. If I said that, I was wrong. I didn't mean to say that. Okay. So what do you want to say about Honeywell then?

Oral argument — Steven Morales v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2018

the accident in Mitchell in 1980 and the Part 77 regulations as they are in effect today are similar in all relevant respects, in that certain structures below an altitude are not deemed a hazard to air … GOTTLIEB I'd just like to address a couple of comments very quickly.

Oral argument — Silvano Lopez-Angel v. William Barr

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 16, 2019

I think there's a difference between your desires and your volitional acts. … Departure seems to me to—it has about it a sort of volitional air. I'm departing today.