Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.50s
Reply Brief — Gregory Shields, Sr., Petitioner v. Kentucky
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Feb 15, 2023
Opp.24. … See PH Vid. 23:15-23:40, 23:45-24:06, 27:20-27:48.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Emiliano Emmanuel Flores-González, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 4, 2024
Flores-González, No. 3:19-cr-00335FAB (Oct. 24, 2019) (judgment). … See Flores-Machicote, 706 F.3d at 24. D.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Texasteel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1947
(R. 24, 25). … Canfield Paper Co., 117 Tex. 399.
331 U.S. 828Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ryan Jason Brannon, Petitioner v. Texas
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 7, 2021
United States, 156 U.S. 237 (1895)……………………… 7, 24 Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009)…………… 7, 8, 19, 24 v Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344 (2011)………………………….. 20 Moskal v. … Petitioner now 14 See Appellant’s Brief at 19, 21, 25-27. 15 Coy, 487 U.S. at 1016 quoting Green, 399 U.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Samuel Elliott, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 11, 2026
Kaminskiv.UnitedStates,399F.3d84,87(2nd Cir. 2003). … Id. at 19-24.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Singleton Packing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1970
oun 24, 1966. “8 See TR..161 para. 24 in this regard. < s . ‘ . oe ae 7 On October 13, 1966, the Board conducted a second ‘election. One ‘hundred and fiftysone (151) persons voted. … L.R.B. 399 F.2d 835 (C. . A. 9,. 1968); Heights Funeral Home, Inc. © N.L.R.B. - 385 F.2d 879 (C.A, 5,-1967).
400 U.S. 824Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 30, 2025
State Bd. of Elections, No. 24 C 1867, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186730 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 23, 2025) ........... 13 Judicial Watch v. Lamone, 399 F. Supp. 3d 425 (D. … State Bd. of Elections, No. 24 C 1867, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186730, at *35 (N.D. Ill. Sep. 23, 2025) (finding concrete injury) with Judicial Watch v. Weber, No. 2:24-cv-03750-MCS-PVC, a *5 (C.D.
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jan 3, 1994
(869-019-00010-1)...... 28.00 Jan. 1, 1993 53-209.............. (869-019-00011-9)...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1993 210-299............. (869-019-00012-7)...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1993 300-399 … ... (869-019-00075-5)...... 30.00 Apr. 1, 1993 300-End............. (869-019-00076-3)...... 22.00 Apr. 1, 1993 23...................(869-019-00077-1)...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1993 24
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Apr 4, 1994
(869-019-00010-1)...... 28.00 Jan. 1, 1993 53-209.............. (869-019-00011-9)...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1993 210-299............. (869-019-00012-7)...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1993 300-399 … ... (869-019-00075-5)...... 30.00 Apr. 1, 1993 300-End............. (869-019-00076-3)...... 22.00 Apr. 1, 1993 23...................(869-019-00077-1)...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1993 24
Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Mar 21, 1994
(869-019-00010-1)...... 28.00 Jan. 1, 1993 53-209.............. (869-019-00011-9)...... 21.00 Jan. 1, 1993 210-299............. (869-019-00012-7)...... 30.00 Jan. 1, 1993 300-399 … ... (869-019-00075-5)...... 30.00 Apr. 1, 1993 300-End............. (869-019-00076-3)...... 22.00 Apr. 1, 1993 23...................(869-019-00077-1)...... 21.00 Apr. 1, 1993 24
Record and brief — Robinson v. Pennsylvania
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
Super. 345, 399 A.2d 1084 (1979). … £0, 220 A. 24 SU 2266); Sommoswealth v. Fine. 166 Pa. Series CL. 109, 70 A. 24 677 1950).
457 U.S. 1101Jurisdictional Statement — Schilb v. Kuebel
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1972
Pennsylo ania, 382 U.S. 399 (1966). . … D, pp. 24-27). | Section 110-7 (f) (App.
404 U.S. 357Opposition — Robbins v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42, 51 (1970) ; People v. … California, 384 U.S. 18, 24 (1967).
443 U.S. 903Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Richard Steven Johnson, Jr., Petitioner v. Neil McDowell, Warden
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2018
Green, 399 U.S. at 157; see id. at 156. … Id. 24 C.
Supplemental Appendix — Cramer v. State Bar of Michigan
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Appendix · 1984
If the constitutional right of self-representation __ "1 See Const 1850, art 6, § 24; Const 1908, art 2, § 12. … State ex re/ State Bar of Wisconsin v Keller, 21 Wis 24 100, 123 NW2d 905 (1963), cert denied 377 US 964; 84 S Ct 1643; 12 L Ed 2d 734 (1964). 1976] STATE BAR V y CaamEn 157 Opinion by Levi unavailability
466 U.S. 974Petitioners Brief — NLRB v. Friedman-Harry Marks Clothing Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1937
Perring, the trial examiner designated by the Board (R. 24). … All other materials used in men’s clothing (see pp. 7, 24, supra), are brought to the plant from points outside Virginia.
301 U.S. 58Federal Register · Notice · Oct 28, 2021
$100 per qualified security over 299. 3 400-499 $10,000 + ($200 per qualified security over 399). 4 500 or greater $30,000 + ($300 per qualified security over 499). … The Fixed Payment due to such member organization is calculated as follows: 2 (the number of symbols over 24) times $200, which equals $400 for the month.
86 FR 59767Securities and Exchange CommissionBrief for the United States — United States v. First National Bancorporation, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the United States · 1972
See, supra, pp. 23-24. … Phillipsburg National Bank, supra, 399 U.S. at 361.
405 U.S. 915Supreme Court brief · Opinion · 1924
POTHIER. 401 399 Opinion of the Court. … PORTLAND SEED CO. 403 399 Syllabus. the validity of the statute on which the charge is based.
264 U.S. 399Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 20, 2018
United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) ................. 24 Williams v. Illinois, 399 U.S. 235 (1970) ......... 2, 5, 15, 18 Younger v. … Illinois, 399 U.S. 235, 240-241 (1970).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.