Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 4, 2007
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
72 FR 296Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan for Texas: General Conformity Rules
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 11, 1998
The EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision under sections 110(k) and 176 of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in providing comments on this action should do so at this time.
63 FR 11863Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 16, 1996
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by June 17, 1996.
61 FR 24737Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 1998
The revision was submitted to satisfy the requirements of section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and 40 CFR part 51. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by August 24, 1998.
63 FR 39792Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2022
Air Act amendments of 1990. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
87 FR 17052Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 14, 2024
The EPA is taking this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 13, 2024. … Requirements of the Clean Air Act and the EPA's Regional Haze Rule B. Best Available Retrofit Technology C. Long-Term Strategy and Reasonable Progress Requirements D.
89 FR 66015Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 8, 2021
These revisions do not have an adverse effect on air quality. The EPA's proposed approval of this proposed rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
86 FR 13264Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 7, 2011
ACTION: Notice of availability and public comment period. … The Clean Air Act (CAA) section 107(d) provides a process for designations that involves recommendations by states and tribes to the EPA and responses from the EPA to those parties, prior to the EPA promulgating
76 FR 39798Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Kern County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 17, 2008
We are proposing to approve local rules under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by February 19, 2008. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
73 FR 3226Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 17, 2019
The EPA is taking this action pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 16, 2019. … /dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
84 FR 34102Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 20, 2000
The EPA is approving these revisions to regulate emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. … The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
65 FR 79789Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 18, 2012
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: May 8, 2012. A.
77 FR 29586Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 24, 2025
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 34812Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 11, 1997
Arizona has lowered the summertime RVP limit for this area to reduce emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOC) in accordance with the requirements of the [[Page 31776]] Clean Air Act, as amended … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
62 FR 31775Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 17, 1999
The approval means that EPA finds the State Plan meets Clean Air Act (Act) requirements. … EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
64 FR 70665Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 17, 1997
Pursuant to the Clean Air Act (the Act), which allows [[Page 38238]] EPA to correct its actions, EPA is today proposing to correct the designation of Lafourche Parish to nonattainment for ozone. … Lafourche Parish in fact experienced a violation during the public comment period, but the Agency did not withdraw its notice approving the redesignation.
62 FR 38237Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 14, 2005
We are proposing to approve these revisions in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act). DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 16, 2005. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
70 FR 7455Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Missouri; Control of Emissions From Aerospace Manufacture and Rework Facilities
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 4, 2020
The EPA's proposed approval of this rule revision is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 5, 2020. … Missouri received eight comments from six sources during the comment period on 10 CSR 10-2.205 and six comments from five sources during the comment period on 10 CSR 10-5.295.
85 FR 6121Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 29, 2004
Cleaning AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
69 FR 77971Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Alaska; Interstate Transport of Pollution
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 15, 2008
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve the action of the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation (ADEC) to address the provisions of Clean Air Act section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) for the 8-hour ozone … EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
73 FR 60996Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.