Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.29s
Respondents Brief — Flagg Bros., Inc. v. Brooks
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1978
OO 24 Johnson v. Riverside Hotel, 399 F. Supp. 1138 (8.D. STE) SISNET cossstenincitenitemnashiantensstbitenstoetasienienitaeipeiniteniates 23 Knapp Street and Co. v. … Naud, 125 Cal. 596, 58 Pac. 186 (1889) .... 24, 25 Stroemer v. Shevin, 399 F. Supp. 993 (S.D. Fla.
436 U.S. 149Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · Jan 23, 2024
24 884 98.2 Pena 201444 Prospective 70 24-4-8 971 97.3 Prospective 70 24-48 896 93.3 15 Studies 56-70 days 24-48 his 15,425 96.1% Mexico Sanhueza 2015i6 Mexico TOTALS Source: Modified … J.A. 399.
Federal Register · Notice · Nov 14, 2001
SR-OCC-2001-03) pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”). 1 Notice of the proposed rule change was published in the Federal Register on August 24, 2001. 2 … appropriate Federal Reserve Bank unless the applicant receives prior written notice that its election is effective or the applicant is notified that the election is ineffective. 10 6 See 66 FR 399
66 FR 57143Securities and Exchange CommissionNew York Municipal Power Agency, et al.; Electric Rate and Corporate Filings
Federal Register · Notice · Jan 28, 2004
(SET) submitted for filing a revised rate schedule, modifying the rate schedule submitted on November 24, 2003 in the above-referenced docket. Comment Date: January 30, 2004. 5. … ER04-399-000] Take notice that on January 13, 2004, Westar Energy, Inc.
69 FR 4124Energy DepartmentFederal Energy Regulatory CommissionOpposition — Cody v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1984
Green, 399 U.S. 149 17 Chapman V. California, 386 U.S. 18 16 Dutton v. Evans, 400 U.S. 74 16,17 Harrington V. California, 396 U.S. 250 00000... 116 Klein v. … LeRoy, 687 F.2d 610, cert. denied, No. 82-5571 (Jan. 24, 1988) Hoe srbseneriade natin sg = fi pean & ay —_——— Use ® c y4 ny Oe ec ' a -+ s 4 re Pe Ae Cases—Continued : Page United States v.
467 U.S. 1226Reply Brief — Richard Gerald Jordan, Applicant v. Mississippi
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 29, 2025
**THIS IS A CAPITAL CASE – EXECUTION SET FOR JUNE 25, 2025** No. 24A1143 No. 24-959 (connected case) In the Supreme Court of the United States RICHARD GERALD JORDAN, v. … Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399, 411 (1986) (“[E]xecution is the most irremediable and unfathomable of penalties.”), and common sense.
Supplemental Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Supplemental Brief · 1993
Spe. 61)... eee ee 5 surance Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (5th Cir. 1968). 3,4 United States National Bank of Oregon et al v. … (Seventh) or is instead a limitation upon the incidental powers granted by Section 24(Seventh). 4.
508 U.S. 971Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Walker, I a a ee cc eciwesiny seine 24 Foucha v. Louisiana, I a ea a da niet 17 Gerstein v. Pugh, os on ok bos ea be i eaw a's 21 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, RS eT eae | 24 INS v. … at 399 n.194 (collecting cases).
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mistick PBT v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
GTE Sylvania, Inc.., Pe Are Ne CR 24 Darby v. Cisneros, cat eB | | Reem AOD ei Bee er a 19 Escondido Mut. Water Co. v. … No. 99-345, at 23-24 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.AN. at 5288-5289 (intent of 1986 amendments “to encourage more private enforcement suits”): id at 24, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5289 (
529 U.S. 1018Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 28, 2022
Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 978 (9th Cir. 2005) (same). … Jackson, 513 F.3d at 1076; Hayes, 399 F.3d at 978.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sarah R. Lee, Petitioner v. Ohio Education Association, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 28, 2020
Judgment entered February 24, 2020. … Gabica that categorically rejects this idea.24 In Clement 20. Pinsky v.
Application — Jonathan Dunn, Applicant v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Application · Apr 11, 2022
On August 24, 2021, respondent Austin ordered vaccination of all active-duty and reserve service members against COVID-19. 3 C.A.E.R. 399-400. … ECF 11-1, at 23-24; C.A. ECF 14-1, at 1112.
Reply Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 15, 2025
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ........................................ 22-23 Riggs v. UCOR, LLC, 2024 WL 3634471 (Aug. 2, 2024, 6th Cir. 2024) ............................... 24 Salliotte v. … Br. 24. To repeat: contractors obtain immunity from suit only if they satisfy the two conditions articulated in Yearsley. Id. at 23–24.
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Peterson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Vol.2, Rule 24, Sec. 381 p. 9n 19---- 24 TE PEE LS PES Fg I Ne I Ls Re Sa eee IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1973 NO. … Cir. 1964), 8 Moore Sec. 24.03 p. 24-32, 33.
419 U.S. 831Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Williams v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1972
ee de ad RCs a | ig. es ee 34 24 ? - That statute, unlike ‘section. 77q(a), clearly makes. each | mailing the gist of the crime.” … Our cisions have never established ‘such a congruencgy . . . 399, U.S. 149;'155, 26 L.Ed.Qd 489, 495.
405 U.S. 954Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Mar 25, 2019
App. 24. … App. 24.
Petitioners Brief, — Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief, · 1966
Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). This September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice, also called ‘‘The Uniform Working Agree- | ment”? (Exh. … Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). In regard to the non-operating crafts, the carrier proposed an initial conference on its September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice for October 18, 1963 (Exh. Vol., p. 400).
384 U.S. 238Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 568 (2005).............-..265 6 Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. … Claim 24 of the patent in suit is both illustrative and representative of the patent claims. Claim 24 can be parsed into its constituent elements as follows: sas 24.
550 U.S. 437Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Reid v. Covert
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1956
ed.) §§ 24-409, 24-411), but, since.the reorganization of the District of Columbia Government, he is now subject to the supervision of the Director of the De- | partment of Corrections, who in turn … BS 399, 406. ° In the Krueger case, Jur. St. ‘App. at 16a, tie . district court expréssly rejected the Arniy’s contention.
351 U.S. 487Reply Brief — John D. Freeman, Petitioner v. Florida
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Apr 29, 2021
Wainwright, 477 U.S. 399 (1986) .................................................................. 12 Hall v. … A.B. at 24.
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.