Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.13s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Flowers Foods, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Angelo Brock

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2026

    See The Railway Labor Act, supra, §§ 3.I.A.2.B (rail functions), 3.I.B.2.b (air functions). 80. See, e.g., Delpro Co. v. Broth. Ry. … The NLRA was enacted in a period of widespread labor unrest in 1934 and 1935.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gun Owners of America, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 7, 2022

    Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 573 U.S. 302, 324, 134 S. … Air Regulatory Grp. v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Vacco v. Quill

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1997

    The notion of “substantive due process,” as many distinguished commentators have pointed out, is an oxymoron — like “green pastel redness,” in the famous comment of John Hart Ely. … A40-A42; see also id. at A41 (“The Stoics glorified suicide as an act of pure rational will.”).

    521 U.S. 793
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — AMG Capital Management, LLC, et al., Petitioners v. Federal Trade Commission

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 7, 2020

    Justice: Hearing Before the House Committee on the Judiciary, 106th Cong. (2000)................................................................. 7, 8 Other Authorities American Antitrust Institute, Comments … Antitrust Inst., Comments of American Antitrust Institute Working Group on Remedies to Antitrust Modernization Commission, 19 (June 17, 2005) (auto manufacturers illegally prevented cheaper Canadian

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican Party of Minn. v. White

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

    ICL’s mission is to “protect and restore the clean water, wildlands, and wildlife of Idaho.” … Major LEAN projects focus on controlling water pollution, reducing toxic air emissions, and improving the safety of pesticides.

    536 U.S. 765
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. United States Shoe Corp.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

    In the same period, exports of agricultural products increased more than 70 percent.’ … Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991, § 2, Pub. L. No. 102-240, 105 Stat. 1914 (hereinafter ISTEA).

    523 U.S. 360
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Jonathan Reisman, Petitioner v. Associated Faculties of the University of Maine, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 4, 2020

    Second, for up to three years after the initial year, “no question concerning unit or representation may be raised except during the period not more than 90 nor less than 60 days prior to the expiration … The convention called upon the “Trump administration to drop its DACA [Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals] appeal in the courts” and resolved that Congress should pass a “clean DREAM Act” that creates

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Democratic National Committee

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

    [it] is not confined to newspapers and periodicals.’ Branzburg v. Hayes, ........ Oy enn , 40 L.W. 5025, 5037. By the same token, within wide limits (see, e.g., Valentine v. … Br. p. 36) open to it under the Act and the Constitution.

    412 U.S. 94
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. Murphy, 139 S. Ct. 626 (2018) (No. 17-1107)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

    Bh IE cesecnscesccecceesecscccecscsecce 12 34 U.S.C. § 20929(a)(1 MA) .......... 0. cccce ees 12 Clean Water Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7601(d) ......... 23 Curtis Act, Act of June 28, 1898, ch. 517, I Tic … But the Curtis Act contained a separate agreement with the Chickasaw and Choctaw Nations that continued their govern- ments in effect for a period of eight years and superseded any inconsistent provisions

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — John H. Merrill, Alabama Secretary of State, et al., Applicants v. Marcus Caster, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 31, 2022

    Such clean districts are consistent with the principle that legislators represent individuals living within identifiable communities. … After the Michigan Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission proposed a slate of maps for comment, some of which wiped out every majority-Black congressional district, the Michigan Department of Civil

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Bender v. Williamsport Area School Dist.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1986

    The 3 Typical school-related services include school assemblies deal- ing with drug and alcohol abuse, suicide, stress, divorce and child abuse, Career Day and vocational guidance, Campus Clean-up, … Under the Equal Access Act, 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 4071-4074 (Cum.

    475 U.S. 534
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Bryan v. Moore

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

    General asphyxia results when the muscles of the chest contract and prevent the lungs from being able to expand to take in air. See id. … Cal. 1994), aff'd, 77 F.3d 301 (9th Cir.), vacated, 519 U.S. 918 (1996), concluded that execution by use of the gas chamber was cruel and unusual, it commented extensively on difficulties encountered

    528 U.S. 1133
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Sylvia Gonzalez, Petitioner v. Edward Trevino, II, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 18, 2023

    Other commentators have similarly criticized the canon. See Reinert, Qualified Immunity, supra, at 218–21 (collecting sources). … Maricopa County, 693 F.3d 896, 917 (9th Cir. 2012) (en banc) (cleaned up).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Scheidler v. National Organization for Women, Inc.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    In both Claiborne Hardware and the instant case the only evidence of violence refers to a few isolated acts of violence during a limited period in the long years under review. … See also Comments of [then Circuit Judge] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, New York University Law School, 1992.

    545 U.S. 1151
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma Corp. Commission v. ANR Pipeline Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

    Mar. 6, 1989), is the State of Oklahoma preempted under the Natural Gas Act and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 from exercising regulatery authority pursuant to Oklahoma Statute title 52, section … Similarily, is the State of Oklahoma preempted under the Natural Gas Act and the Natural Gas Policy Act of 1978 from establishing a priority of production schedule pursuant to the State’s strong interest

    490 U.S. 1051
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — McDonough v. Smith (No. 18-485)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2019

    McCollan, PPoase Bf eRe wore Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp, — £th fs» Ea Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. … Civil Rights Act of 1871, ch. 22, § 1, 17 Stat. 13.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Defenders of Wildlife

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

    However, Section 7(a)(2) is clear on its face that it applies to any action “carried out” by a federal agency, even when that action is pursuant to a statute, like the Clean Water Act, that was enacted … Rather, “public comments ... prompt{ed] EPA to adopt” it. Jd. at 296.

    549 U.S. 1105
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Zachary v. Louisiana (No. 08-1074)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

    One contributor to the ratification debates, for example, commenting on the jury trial guarantee in Art. … Ultimately, of course, the attempt failed, the juries' victory being embodied in Fox's Libel Act in Britain, see generally T.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Kevin Brott, et al., Petitioners v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 22, 2018

    The Tucker Act requires filing such takings claims in the Court of Federal Claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1491. … Goodman, supra, at 102 (discussing Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co. v. United States, 261 U.S. 299, 302–03 (1923)).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Stanford v. Kentucky

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989

    The maximum period of incarceration is life. §609.10. 9). New York juvenile courts have no jucisdiction over any individual older than 16. … Wells commenting on the March 1984 report of the National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (NAC).

    492 U.S. 361

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.