Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Peterson v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Vol.2, Rule 24, Sec. 381 p. 9n 19---- 24 TE PEE LS PES Fg I Ne I Ls Re Sa eee IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OCTOBER TERM, 1973 NO. … Cir. 1964), 8 Moore Sec. 24.03 p. 24-32, 33.
419 U.S. 831Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Mistick PBT v. Housing Authority of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2000
GTE Sylvania, Inc.., Pe Are Ne CR 24 Darby v. Cisneros, cat eB | | Reem AOD ei Bee er a 19 Escondido Mut. Water Co. v. … No. 99-345, at 23-24 (1986), reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.AN. at 5288-5289 (intent of 1986 amendments “to encourage more private enforcement suits”): id at 24, reprinted in 1986 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5289 (
529 U.S. 1018Amicus Curiae Brief — Jennings v. Rodriguez, 136 S. Ct. 2489 (2016) (No. 15-1204)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016
Walker, I a a ee cc eciwesiny seine 24 Foucha v. Louisiana, I a ea a da niet 17 Gerstein v. Pugh, os on ok bos ea be i eaw a's 21 Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, RS eT eae | 24 INS v. … at 399 n.194 (collecting cases).
Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Vuitch
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
United States, 354 U.S. 394, 399-400 (1957) Craig v. Rowland, 10 App. D.C. 402 (1897) Daley v. Meier, 33 Ill. App.24 218, 178 N.E.2d 691 (1961) . Damasiewicz v. … Bl. 399, 126 Eng.
402 U.S. 62Opposition — Bell & Howell Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
The election resulted in seven votes for Local 399, and one against (id. at A28). … This doctrine was first enunciated by the Board in Miranda Fuel Company, _Inc.:%9 See Meltzer, supra at p. 24.
442 U.S. 942Application — Jonathan Dunn, Applicant v. Lloyd J. Austin III, Secretary of Defense, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Application · Apr 11, 2022
On August 24, 2021, respondent Austin ordered vaccination of all active-duty and reserve service members against COVID-19. 3 C.A.E.R. 399-400. … ECF 11-1, at 23-24; C.A. ECF 14-1, at 1112.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Deboer v. Snyder, 135 S. Ct. 1040 (2015) (No. 14-571)
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015
See id. at 399. … DeBoer, 772 F.3d at 399.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Walter Glenn, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Oct 18, 2019
Jenson, 462 F.3d 399, 406 (5th Cir. 2006). … Jenson, 462 F.3d 399, 406 (5th Cir. 2006). Therefore, his consent was improperly obtained. c.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Rust v. Sullivan
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Rust Brief at 24 n.39. The only support cited from the cases of this Court is footnote 8 in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services, 109 S. … See gen- erally authorities cited in AAPS Amicus Brief, Section IV. 24 comes in the context of the post-conception transitional referral.
500 U.S. 173Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Concourse Nursing Home v. Perales
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
New York State Department of Health, 184 A.D.2d 399, 585 N.Y.S.2d 355 [eee ee OE 2) a eee re a 17, 23, 24 Maine v. … Constitution. .....-.-- 24 28 U.S.C. § 1257(a) (1988) ...--- 22 seer eee 2 Pasa Fade @ sR aNSP as array oe em A, Me ee gt 24 SI USE ST oa oe et os es 18 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(a(4A .-- 2-2 ee ee ees 18
519 U.S. 863Petition for a Writ of Certiorari — Tuttle v. Bell
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1942
I I cs he Cars dn ap ns en et tne v8 eet oF 7, 24 Louisville G. & E. Co. v. Coleman, 277 U. S. 32 (1928).. 31 Louisville & Nashville Ry. Co. v. Greene, 244 U. … Co., 300 Til. 399 (1921)...... iii People v. Cesar, 349 Ill. 372 ¢: } APS are ea 20 People v. Lots in Ashley, 122 Ill. 297 tg Pere 20 People v. St.
315 U.S. 815Reply Brief — The GEO Group, Inc., Petitioner v. Alejandro Menocal, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Oct 15, 2025
McKnight, 521 U.S. 399 (1997) ........................................ 22-23 Riggs v. UCOR, LLC, 2024 WL 3634471 (Aug. 2, 2024, 6th Cir. 2024) ............................... 24 Salliotte v. … Br. 24. To repeat: contractors obtain immunity from suit only if they satisfy the two conditions articulated in Yearsley. Id. at 23–24.
Respondents Brief — Ramdass v. Angelone
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2000
(JA 399-400). … (JA 399-400).
530 U.S. 156Petitioners Brief — Greer v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1987
Maroney, 399 U.S. 42 (1970) (evidence ob- tained in violation of Fourth Amendment); Coleman v. Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) (Sixth Amendment right to counsel at preliminary hearing). … Chapman, 386 U.S. at 24.
483 U.S. 756Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bates Industries, Inc. v. Daytona Sports Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1971
Co., 208 F.2d 1 ........ 9 Aufhauser, Application of, 399 F.2d 275 .......... 14, 23 Bates Industries, Inc. v. … John Deere Co., supra, 383 U.S. at 386, 15 L.ed.2d at 566, 86 S.Ct. 684; Application of Aufhauser, supra, 399 F.2d 275, 277 (C.C.P.A. 1968). 7 “ . 6.
404 U.S. 991Petitioners Brief — Rosario v. Rockefeller
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1973
A motion for a rehearing in banc was made on Monday, April 10, 1972 and was denied on April 24, 1972. The petition for certiorari herein was docketed on April 24, 1972. … NJ., May 24, 1972).
410 U.S. 752Petitioners Brief, — Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief, · 1966
Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). This September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice, also called ‘‘The Uniform Working Agree- | ment”? (Exh. … Vol., pp. 399-440; R. 278). In regard to the non-operating crafts, the carrier proposed an initial conference on its September 24, 1963, Section 6 Notice for October 18, 1963 (Exh. Vol., p. 400).
384 U.S. 238Amicus Curiae Brief — Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. Haslip
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1991
Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 404 (1966), where this Court referred to the term “reprehens- ible conduct” as “loose and unlimiting.” … /Pg. 24/25/27 24/33/22 24/52/19 24/43/18 24/28/2 25/8/12 24/51/13 25/2/19 24/17/3 24/20/6 24/48/16 24/8/3 24/17/4 24/26/40 24
499 U.S. 1Motion to Dismiss or Affirm — Reid v. Covert
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Dismiss or Affirm · 1956
ed.) §§ 24-409, 24-411), but, since.the reorganization of the District of Columbia Government, he is now subject to the supervision of the Director of the De- | partment of Corrections, who in turn … BS 399, 406. ° In the Krueger case, Jur. St. ‘App. at 16a, tie . district court expréssly rejected the Arniy’s contention.
351 U.S. 487Amicus Curiae Brief — Microsoft Corp. v. AT & T CORP.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Microsoft Corp., 399 F.3d 1325 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct. 568 (2005).............-..265 6 Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. … Claim 24 of the patent in suit is both illustrative and representative of the patent claims. Claim 24 can be parsed into its constituent elements as follows: sas 24.
550 U.S. 437
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.