Documents

Oral argument — United States v. Brandon Dean

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2011

Each substantive count identified what period of time the crime was alleged to have been. Well, what about the names? … I mean, do you really think there's a chance – when a judge has a year and a day, it's usually not a number plucked out of thin air. Correct.

Oral argument — California River Watch v. City of Vacaville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 14, 2021

The transporter is an affirmative act. It's not we're not talking about a passive act. We're talking an affirmative act. I know that. … So why shouldn't the city be liable for cleaning it before it spreads it?

Oral argument — St. Lucie County Fire District v. Joseph Br

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2018

To be clear, the Exchange Act issues do not affect my clients. It's my issues that also affect the Exchange Act client, the Exchange Act defendants. … I suggest you clean up the other piece. I'm working hard on it, Your Honor. I don't like holding stuff out there. And I understand that completely.

Oral argument — Spokane Airport Board v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2025

Typically, it's a dispute about whether an agency follows the Administrative Procedure Act, including notice and comment provisions. … And at that time, it's a 14-day period. There's a 30-day period for TSA to go through the TSRB.

Oral argument — Michael Smith v. Crisp Regional Hospital, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 18, 2020

You can't send them via private car, or if you've got to use an air flight, you've got to use an air flight. You have to have an appropriate transfer mechanism. … They didn't just say, two, appropriate transfer, an appropriate transfer to a medical facility must occur and put a period.

Oral argument — Richter v. Prairie Farms Dairy, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2015

I don't recall any comment on the latches. There's nothing on the record about that? No, sir. So there's still a pending motion at the point of the trial court? No, sir. … It's a 2619 motion, based on a limitations period.

Oral argument — Page Plus Of Atlanta Snap Prepaid LLC v. Owl Wireless LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2013

It is important to know that this case was preceded by an earlier case filed by PPA and another unrelated corporation called Air Link in 2010. … In other words, an assignment, like so many things that are — that courts and lawyers deal with, it's a legal act, and there are requirements to determine whether that legal act has happened or not happened

Oral argument — Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. Valladolid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011

Act. … Just the fact that it is moved off the shelf for a cleaning, scrap, for removal, et cetera, is an immaterial difference.

Oral argument — Carnegie Institution of Washington v. Fenix Diamonds LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

They alerted, still during the fact discovery period, they alerted the defendants that they were having trouble getting fact discovery, they were considering withdrawing it, and then a few weeks later, … When we talk about the acting... That's generally the case if the basis of the exceptional case determination is extreme meritlessness at some point.

Oral argument — Cushing v. Motorcoach Industries, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 28, 2013

When these remarks were made, what period was this? … is that for a period of time that the child resided with her.

Oral argument — Farmers and Merchants State Bank of Bushnell v. Hulett

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 23, 2012

But Section 78 has a comment that seems to say everything that I've been trying to say. … I just have a couple of, I guess, cleaning things that are just informational.

Oral argument — Bobek v. ABM Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2018

If we would begin with Section 16 of the Act, Section 16 of the Act requires that the process and procedure before the commission shall be simple and summary, as reasonably may be. … And they fail to comment. And then now we find ourselves in this situation. It's on the wall behind me. It says, this is the other side. So, I ask that you do. Thank you.

Oral argument — Leseman, LLC v. Stratasys, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2017

And taking it apart in this context is really a very simple act. It is not the kind of taking apart that you're imagining. It's simply taking a couple of screws apart. … This is a comment that concludes our proceedings for this morning. All rise.

Oral argument — People v. Borizov

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 13, 2015

And furthermore, the state's attorney, and this also comes from case law, has an air of authority to him. … Your Honor, the comments complained of by the defendant were comments in response to rebuttal, and as we set forth in our brief, a lot of those, or most if not all of those comments, were invited by a

Oral argument — United States v. Emmett Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024

Yes, but I think the polygraph comment was so powerful, it probably influenced the hung jury in the first trial. It should have been allowed in the second trial. … And the I think she had to do more than simply jump to that based on a recommendation of the probation department because of the act itself, the alleged act itself.

Oral argument — Donald Davis v. American States Insurance Comp

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2013

Council, let me direct you to a different part of D, additional coverage collapse, and ask for your comments on that. … Is to replace that part of the roof and clean up the junk that fell in. Exactly.

Oral argument — ASTRIUM v. TRW, INC.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2006

and some satellites that never got up into the air and related investigation costs. … It also says we hold that the economic loss rule does not bar fraud and misrepresentation, period. So it actually holds two different things.

Oral argument — Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Leanne Marten

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2019

Disturbance effects would be short-term and insignificant, period. That's the whole discussion. That's true. … This use will be spread over a significant period. It will not be 48 hours back-to-back.

Oral argument — Paul Hansmeier, Esq. v. John Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2015

Ryan says, essentially, Lockery is no longer good law, period, full stop. … But so to come back to how the Copyright Act plays in, right?

Oral argument — People v. Moody

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2015

You had a gentleman swinging a two-by-four with teeth flying through the air. Those are potentially lethal blows being delivered. … And that's what was figured out during this time period. And it was Illinois. The alternative could have been attempt murder in Illinois, murder in Indiana.