Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.80s
Federal Register · Rule · May 19, 1997
Response To Comments The following comments were received during the public comment period ending April 7, 1997. EPA's response follows each comment. … for groups to which they belong, to appeal DEQ's decisions, including but not limited to DEQ permits issued under the Clean Air (and Clean Water) Acts.''
62 FR 27204Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 19, 2000
The EPA is providing a shortened time period for comment for two reasons. … Air Act.
65 FR 62666Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 29, 2005
We are approving the revisions pursuant to sections 110, 116 and part D of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 15769Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 29, 2001
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. … Air Act.
66 FR 17078Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Michigan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 6, 2013
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What action is EPA taking? … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
78 FR 8485Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Jan 12, 2024
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Two sections of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) govern the establishment and revision of the NAAQS. … Section 109(d)(1) of the Act requires periodic review and, if appropriate, revision of existing air quality criteria.
89 FR 2223Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 23, 2000
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
65 FR 8857Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 24, 2013
EPA is proposing this action under section 110 and part C of the Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA). DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 24, 2013. … Air Act.” 74 FR 66496 (December 15, 2009). 2 “Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs.” 75 FR 17004 (April 2, 2010). 3
78 FR 37752Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 14, 2005
We are proposing to approve SCAQMD Rule 1105.1 to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
70 FR 34435Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jul 8, 2002
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 45066Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 26, 2018
Several requesters also stated that EPA had provided a 120-day comment period for its Clean Power Plan rule. … We recognize, however, that the original schedule for the proposed rule public comment period did not reflect the Clean Air Act requirement that the record of proceedings allowing oral presentation of
83 FR 48578Environmental Protection AgencyTransportation DepartmentFederal Register · Rule · May 19, 2023
This determination, as required under Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 179 and 188, is based upon quality-assured, quality-controlled, and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 2019-2021 period available … Therefore, EPA has met the requirement pursuant to Clean Air Act (CAA) sections 179(c) and 188(b)(2) to determine, based on the area's air quality as of the attainment date, whether the area attained the
88 FR 32117Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan; Pinal County
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 6, 2010
We are approving these local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
75 FR 17307Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 13, 1998
The Clean Air Act forbids EPA to base its actions concerning SIPs on such grounds. Union Electric Co. v. U.S. EPA, 427 U.S. 246, 255-66 (1976); 42 U.S.C. 7410(a)(2). C. … Section 110(k) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA act on implementation plans submitted by States. This rulemaking implements that statutory command.
63 FR 26455Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Minnesota
Federal Register · Rule · May 20, 2009
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 23632Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2013
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 53249Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Jersey; Gasoline Vapor Recovery Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 26, 2019
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
84 FR 65063Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jan 25, 2013
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no relevant comments. III. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 5305Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 4, 2011
The Clean Air Act (CAA) contains specific authority allowing any state to adopt new motor vehicle emissions standards that are identical to California's standards in lieu of applicable Federal standards … Pennsylvania and the Ozone NAAQS Under the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990, Pennsylvania had thirty-three counties designated nonattainment under the former 1-hour ozone NAAQS.
76 FR 68381Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 13, 2009
We are approving 4 local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
74 FR 33399Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.