Documents

Oral argument — Ricardo Sauceda v. City of San Benito, Texas, et a

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 31, 2020

What are the time periods like one or two seconds? Or what's the longest period in our brief? We actually have all of that stated. … That's that's the time periods when it was covered.

Oral argument — RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

But if I charge the cop with stealing from the evidence locker, and it gets washed out in an early stage, he's somehow entitled to a clean record. … Just a few brief comments.

Oral argument — InReDDMG

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 10, 2014

In fact, the license covered the entire period of the patent. Not infinite. Well, patents are not infinite. … So it would have extended beyond the five-year period.

Oral argument — U. S. Home Corporation v. Settlers Crossing, L.L.C.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2017

A contract that gave you a cure period, provided for a cure period, which had not expired at the time you were granted access. Correct? That's correct. Well, yes. … The Federal law, she cites, is the Solid Waste Disposal Act. And that exempts sewage sludge because it's regulated by the Clean Water Act. That's what regulates sewage sludge.

Oral argument — Kristen Giovanni v. US Department of the Navy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 26, 2018

of drinking contaminated water coming from the Willow Grove Naval Air Station. … It is not a cleanup act. That's what CERCLA is, so it's a disposal act. And under RCRA, it's talking about any state substantive law.

Oral argument — CADORET v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

I'm going to make a couple brief comments. Dan, Derek, and Abby, time really flies when you're working hard and you're enjoying your task at hand. … In Kent, the question was whether after there's a clean bill of health, whether any post facto medical opinion could be sufficient to overcome the presumption of soundness.

Oral argument — Bradford v. Ayers

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004

I think the rest of the tape gave context to that and showed – What's the point of having him – showing him being shackled and taken down the hall for a long period of time and all that? … Made a comment. You mean. Yes. I mean. So could have cut the other way. That he did it and you could look at the tape and. And argued that he didn't. Not only argue that you didn't. He did.

Oral argument — United States v. Ry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 25, 2019

So, my client is clean for a period, has a problem, returns to drugs to support his habit, he's selling heroin to a CI. … The other thing I would say with respect to Your Honor's comment about sweetening the pot, is I read application note 14 to the guideline, the gun has to facilitate the drug transaction, or have the capacity

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Burno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

It's on plein air review. We don't think that there was any plein air. … And kind of a final point, logically, any- Well, first, in a conspiracy, you don't have to commit the acts or the objects. So it's just an agreement to commit those acts.

Oral argument — George Clark v. Anthony Abdallah

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024

I guess you're saying that maybe during the 40 minute gap, there was a coaching in that period? Is that what you're saying? … I think, depending on the facts of the fabrication, but fabrication being a knowing act of falsifying some evidence is evidence of malice.

Oral argument — & 04-74004 Martinez v. Gonzales

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006

That's out of the period that's specified by the regulations. Was BIA required to — not to send your people out of the country until they had decided R.A.? … So the government's hands aren't clean as far as I'm concerned.

Oral argument — St. Lucie County Fire District v. Joseph Br

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2018

To be clear, the Exchange Act issues do not affect my clients. It's my issues that also affect the Exchange Act client, the Exchange Act defendants. … I suggest you clean up the other piece. I'm working hard on it, Your Honor. I don't like holding stuff out there. And I understand that completely.

Oral argument — Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP v. Valladolid

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 11, 2011

Act. … Just the fact that it is moved off the shelf for a cleaning, scrap, for removal, et cetera, is an immaterial difference.

Oral argument — Tazu v. Atty Gen USA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 13, 2020

And after the 30-day period, that wasn't effectuated and converted to an order of removal. Let me ask this. … Glover whether we have authority to act or not, whether the government has authority to act under a provision is reviewable. And Mr. Somput was beginning his response. Thanks.

Oral argument — Sierra Club v. DOE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2024

So it just seems like, you know, if you were doing a Clean Air Act suit, I get how that may or may not be a good vehicle depending on a particular case. … It would be what we are seeking in this case is for DOE to comply with the Administrative Procedures Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, and the Natural Gas Act to provide a coherent record and

Oral argument — In Re: Thomas Heavey

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 6, 2017

I'm just cleaning up the record. … It's a stay violation, period. You can't do this. Acts to do this are violations of the stay.

Oral argument — In re Marriage of Renth

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2012

Nikki at the time worked at Scott Air Force Base and she was a what's called a contract employee and she had been at Scott Air Force Base for about 25 years also. … It was during a period of time. It was 2003-2004, I believe she testified. There's no evidence that the marriage was breaking down at that period of time.

Oral argument — Maria N. Vinson v. Koch Foods of Alabama, LLC, Koch Foods, LLC, David Birchfield

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2018

Quigg, and it cites to the page under 1983 about intentional comments. One, that's a misapplication of Quigg. … Maybe you wouldn't say very, very close, but close, because during the period of time she shows up at work thinking she's been terminated.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniela Gozes-Wagner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2020

You cannot just isolate comments and that's what the court in Niva held. You can't just isolate one or two comments in Niva. It was a different context because there they are. … Council says plain air review on that. Do you acknowledge that that is plain air? Oh, that was absolutely preserved.

Oral argument — Westcott v. US Dept of Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

And in doing so, it sought substantial public comment and input. … And plainly something happened because the numbers weren't pulled out of thin air.