Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.43s
Oral argument — Christopher Garnier v. Michelle O'Connor-Ratcliff
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2025
Let's take the post-2018 period, right? Now that there is no clutter, the worst thing they could do is put a thumbs down or a frowning face or something, right? Yes. But they're still blocked. … Let me finish my question to air their grievances with the school board. I think that's actually not quite correct, Your Honor.
44 min of audioOral argument — Healthcentral.com v. Sigma Micro Corp
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2006
She went back over the history of this client and this debtor or this debtor and this creditor and figured out what was the normal payment terms during that period and said, well, there you go. … And then there are some subsequent clean-up amendments in the Bankruptcy Act that provided that the bankruptcy court may have jury trials, but it cannot be done without consent of parties. Thank you.
30 min of audioOral argument — Zhejiang Native Produce v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2014
And then the parties, interested parties, all take part in providing comments. … What they're not filing their appeal did is it deprived the government and us and you of the opportunity to air these arguments openly in court.
40 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brian Barker
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2010
I guess it was over a day's period or two days' period that what was encompassed and the record reflects that the U.S. attorney's responses were ambivalent. … That's where the phone call, they give the phone call to Tutsloth to go clean up the house and bring bail money. So we have two different law enforcement agencies.
40 min of audioOral argument — CELSIS IN VITRO v. CELLZDIRECT
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 4, 2011
You take that pool of cells, you clean them up, we'll say, or separate the viable from non-viable using the technique density gradient fractionation, so that you cull down the number of viable cells. … Any final comments, Mr. Kelly? In my final comment, in the reply brief, the appellants raised the issue of the pending re-exam.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Emmett Miguel
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 11, 2024
Yes, but I think the polygraph comment was so powerful, it probably influenced the hung jury in the first trial. It should have been allowed in the second trial. … And the I think she had to do more than simply jump to that based on a recommendation of the probation department because of the act itself, the alleged act itself.
44 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gregory Sperow
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2010
The first count, the CCE, had 98 predicate acts and 78 pages of overt acts, probably 700 overt acts. The third count, the money laundering count, had four. Why does that say it can't be tried? … time periods that cover the time period covered by counsel.
35 min of audioOral argument — Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Xavier Becerra
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 14, 2023
That in itself is not enough to be in the Medicare Act, the Medicare fraction of the DISH provisions. … So I would submit that Congress didn't think a person in, you know, just someone who's sort of eligible in the out in the air. I mean, I see that.
36 min of audioOral argument — People v. DiBenedetto
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2017
Looking at your brief, you do not ask that it be remanded for a new sentencing period. You ask only that the count six be vacated. Correct. … Our argument is based on the closely balanced evidence prong, plain air review, as well as the fundamental rights prong.
42 min of audioOral argument — George Clark v. Anthony Abdallah
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2024
I guess you're saying that maybe during the 40 minute gap, there was a coaching in that period? Is that what you're saying? … I think, depending on the facts of the fabrication, but fabrication being a knowing act of falsifying some evidence is evidence of malice.
31 min of audioOral argument — & 04-74004 Martinez v. Gonzales
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006
That's out of the period that's specified by the regulations. Was BIA required to — not to send your people out of the country until they had decided R.A.? … So the government's hands aren't clean as far as I'm concerned.
31 min of audioOral argument — Cory Lange v. Anchor Glass Container Corpora
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2023
Lange commented that next time he would not sell to an undercover cop. Mr. Lange now denies making any such statement. The district court found that Mr. … Page three says, and I quote, in addition to the clean background check, each of the candidates hired had more post-secondary education than Mr. Lange, close quote.
23 min of audioOral argument — Richard Bell v. Cameron Taylor
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2016
So you had about a five-year period of time when no sales? No, I didn't have any sales during the first five years. Community Hospital was the first organization that bought it. Was there any other? … We have affidavits that have been presented in the case that he refused to answer those questions and basically made comments like, well, the price just went up. Was there a website or something?
33 min of audioOral argument — County of Amador v. U.S. Dept. of Interior
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 14, 2017
factors that this court and other courts have used to determine the limits of when an administrative agency may impose something retroactively to come up with a standard for the interpretation of the Clean … Air Act, where it was determined that EPA there must, in certain circumstances, impose the regulations retroactively.
39 min of audioOral argument — Citizens for Clean Energy v. National Mining Association
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2024
Mineral Leasing Act. … Those are the same factors, royalty rates, carbon budgeting, things that go beyond simple air or climate effects.
57 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brandon Shoffner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2019
In a resentencing, a court begins with a clean slate, and that's exactly what this court was authorized to do and chose to do. … allocution failed to even raise the strike to the officer, which was in fact noted by the district court when the court encouraged the defendant to reflect on the strike to the officer and how to avoid acting
20 min of audioOral argument — Jill Thornsberry v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2013
The appellant was very vague in describing her past work history, acted with a mild air of indifference about the entire examination proceedings, and the doctor found that her complaints appeared disproportionate … So the period because we are discussing... What period are we discussing? 208 to... I don't know the date of the subsequent... About three years. About three years. So we're talking $36,000.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ikeviaun Johnson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024
And your honor, the plein air conceded by the government is the first two elements of plein air relief. That there was air and it was plein and Mr. … But I want to circle back just briefly to Judge Nemar's comment about the jury instructions and highlight one thing.
43 min of audioOral argument — Incyte Corporation v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2025
I'd like to address a comment made by counsel just now, that there was no separate finding of irreparable harm due to effect on investment value. … I was somebody who had air loss, and I start using a product, and the label says, if you stop using this product, all your hair's going to fall out. I would not stop using that product ever.
22 min of audioOral argument — Janet Pecher v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2017
Typically, they arise, they're chronic, and they arise over a long period of time. … Wisconsin Workers' Comp Act.
60 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.