Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.63s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Jacky McComber

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2025

    The comments and questions of Ms. … So that was all aired in front of the jury.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — AZ v. Joseph Biden

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2022

    remain are more likely to commit crimes especially because the whole point of the priorities is to reduce the number of dangerous individuals in the country but a federal statute about regulating this air … quality or that air quality in one nation was going to change the rising of the seas I mean I'm talking about redressability yes yes your honor so you know Massachusetts does stand for the proposition

    66 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. The Department of Public Health

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019

    The Department is asking that the Court construe those time periods as directory. … But like many timetables, that is an aspirational time period.

    52 min of audio
  • Oral argument — DCH Regional Medical Center v. Alex Michael Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

    There was a notice and comment period. We submitted a comment, and it was effectively ignored. So it's a federal rule? Yes. And that is the rule that we're challenging. … It was a form to accept notice and comment by March 3rd. Right. Right.

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Taggart v. Lorenzen

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019

    ticket, a clean bill of health, instead of just, you know, going after the newly released debtor who's getting a fresh start. … We acted reasonably and in good faith.

    54 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Villarreal v. Texas

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

    So our view is that you just have a right to talk about your testimony, period, right? … It's been a very clean rule, unlike the rule that Texas and even the United States advocates.

    77 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Bordonici

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

    The case law is a little bit in conflict with saying that, well, he's going to be deported for acts prior to 1993. … But if you look at what happened in that period of time, the immigration wasn't involved.

    57 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

    The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any, as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Precise Aerospace Mfg., Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019

    In addition to that comment, there was statements of offensive conduct regarding further harassment and bullying telephone calls to Ms. Abde after the balls on the table comment. … That amendment put forth additional factual allegations, which, assuming the original allegations were not sufficient to support the UNDER Act claim, would support the UNDER Act claim.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Silvestre Avila Herrera

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

    Is your client going to be better served by going back with a clean sheet of paper and letting a different judge make a brand new calculation? … We're going to act like it makes a difference. Well, can I respond to that? A couple of points.

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hans Schink v. Commissioner of Social Security

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2019

    But again, there has to be evidence presented that substantiates a 12-month period. But can you pick and choose which pieces you want to rely on? … Well, you know, you make the comment about the sporadic nature of the treatment as a reason why not to attach weight to it.

    34 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Heather Minick v. Metro Gov of Nash and Mailena Mason

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2013

    Mason acted with deliberate indifference for the safety of Mr. Minnick, but instead acted reasonably. … In the Durham case, as Your Honor will recall, the nurse had initiated the, I guess, the confrontation or the events that led to the confrontation with the patient by instructing him to clean up after

    26 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jorge Rojas v. FAA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018

    It's not like a Federal Tort Claims Act case. … That's my first comment. I guess it's not a question, but it's really concerning to me. I understand.

    35 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. DiBenedetto

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2017

    Looking at your brief, you do not ask that it be remanded for a new sentencing period. You ask only that the count six be vacated. Correct. … Our argument is based on the closely balanced evidence prong, plain air review, as well as the fundamental rights prong.

    42 min of audio
  • Oral argument — 50341 USA v. Mercado

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2004

    So with those comments, I would submit. All right. Thank you, Counsel. If you may please the Court, Fred Rowley, Jr. for the United States. … But again, what the special verdict asked the jury to answer was whether the defendants were guilty of racketeering acts. And those racketeering acts themselves were charged offenses.

    22 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Bridges v. DVA

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2007

    They would have seen a clean bill of health. They would have asked for all his childhood medical records. … He might have had a personality disorder or condition in 1950, but over a period of more than 45 years, he developed depression.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Delil v. Point Reyes Seashore Lodge

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

    Even the comments to Rule 54c of the local rules provides that the parties should be aware that the time is short. … There will be a warning to district judges that if they're trying to clean up their calendar, don't do it, because — Right. There is — there is another way.

    48 min of audio
  • Oral argument — MK International v. Crown Products & Services

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2019

    Many people have commented and said you must be a really good trial attorney because you understand transactional law. … Brown was not acting as AB rubber when he visited. He acted as crown.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Continental Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2021

    So there wasn't this clean distinction between old claims and old losses and new losses. They got all lumped together. … Somme's comment says. The whole relationship is called into jeopardy. And that's where do we find his comments? Could you remind me?

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Campaign Legal Center v. 45Committee, Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

    Second, the district court erred in determining that the FEC acted during the conformance period, despite failing to obtain the majority vote required for it to exercise its authority under FECA. … With respect to the second issue, district court erred in determining that the FEC acted when it deadlocked on whether to find reason to believe during the conformance period.

    22 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.