Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.63s
Oral argument — United States v. Jacky McComber
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2025
The comments and questions of Ms. … So that was all aired in front of the jury.
32 min of audioOral argument — AZ v. Joseph Biden
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 7, 2022
remain are more likely to commit crimes especially because the whole point of the priorities is to reduce the number of dangerous individuals in the country but a federal statute about regulating this air … quality or that air quality in one nation was going to change the rising of the seas I mean I'm talking about redressability yes yes your honor so you know Massachusetts does stand for the proposition
66 min of audioOral argument — Lakewood Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. The Department of Public Health
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 11, 2019
The Department is asking that the Court construe those time periods as directory. … But like many timetables, that is an aspirational time period.
52 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018
There was a notice and comment period. We submitted a comment, and it was effectively ignored. So it's a federal rule? Yes. And that is the rule that we're challenging. … It was a form to accept notice and comment by March 3rd. Right. Right.
49 min of audioOral argument — Taggart v. Lorenzen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2019
ticket, a clean bill of health, instead of just, you know, going after the newly released debtor who's getting a fresh start. … We acted reasonably and in good faith.
54 min of audioOral argument — Villarreal v. Texas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025
So our view is that you just have a right to talk about your testimony, period, right? … It's been a very clean rule, unlike the rule that Texas and even the United States advocates.
77 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Bordonici
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003
The case law is a little bit in conflict with saying that, well, he's going to be deported for acts prior to 1993. … But if you look at what happened in that period of time, the immigration wasn't involved.
57 min of audioOral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009
The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any, as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.
44 min of audioOral argument — Precise Aerospace Mfg., Inc. v. MAG Aerospace Industries, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 13, 2019
In addition to that comment, there was statements of offensive conduct regarding further harassment and bullying telephone calls to Ms. Abde after the balls on the table comment. … That amendment put forth additional factual allegations, which, assuming the original allegations were not sufficient to support the UNDER Act claim, would support the UNDER Act claim.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Silvestre Avila Herrera
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010
Is your client going to be better served by going back with a clean sheet of paper and letting a different judge make a brand new calculation? … We're going to act like it makes a difference. Well, can I respond to that? A couple of points.
20 min of audioOral argument — Hans Schink v. Commissioner of Social Security
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2019
But again, there has to be evidence presented that substantiates a 12-month period. But can you pick and choose which pieces you want to rely on? … Well, you know, you make the comment about the sporadic nature of the treatment as a reason why not to attach weight to it.
34 min of audioOral argument — Heather Minick v. Metro Gov of Nash and Mailena Mason
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 24, 2013
Mason acted with deliberate indifference for the safety of Mr. Minnick, but instead acted reasonably. … In the Durham case, as Your Honor will recall, the nurse had initiated the, I guess, the confrontation or the events that led to the confrontation with the patient by instructing him to clean up after
26 min of audioOral argument — Jorge Rojas v. FAA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2018
It's not like a Federal Tort Claims Act case. … That's my first comment. I guess it's not a question, but it's really concerning to me. I understand.
35 min of audioOral argument — People v. DiBenedetto
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 28, 2017
Looking at your brief, you do not ask that it be remanded for a new sentencing period. You ask only that the count six be vacated. Correct. … Our argument is based on the closely balanced evidence prong, plain air review, as well as the fundamental rights prong.
42 min of audioOral argument — 50341 USA v. Mercado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2004
So with those comments, I would submit. All right. Thank you, Counsel. If you may please the Court, Fred Rowley, Jr. for the United States. … But again, what the special verdict asked the jury to answer was whether the defendants were guilty of racketeering acts. And those racketeering acts themselves were charged offenses.
22 min of audioOral argument — Bridges v. DVA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2007
They would have seen a clean bill of health. They would have asked for all his childhood medical records. … He might have had a personality disorder or condition in 1950, but over a period of more than 45 years, he developed depression.
32 min of audioOral argument — Delil v. Point Reyes Seashore Lodge
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007
Even the comments to Rule 54c of the local rules provides that the parties should be aware that the time is short. … There will be a warning to district judges that if they're trying to clean up their calendar, don't do it, because — Right. There is — there is another way.
48 min of audioOral argument — MK International v. Crown Products & Services
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2019
Many people have commented and said you must be a really good trial attorney because you understand transactional law. … Brown was not acting as AB rubber when he visited. He acted as crown.
31 min of audioOral argument — Continental Casualty Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2021
So there wasn't this clean distinction between old claims and old losses and new losses. They got all lumped together. … Somme's comment says. The whole relationship is called into jeopardy. And that's where do we find his comments? Could you remind me?
39 min of audioOral argument — Campaign Legal Center v. 45Committee, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024
Second, the district court erred in determining that the FEC acted during the conformance period, despite failing to obtain the majority vote required for it to exercise its authority under FECA. … With respect to the second issue, district court erred in determining that the FEC acted when it deadlocked on whether to find reason to believe during the conformance period.
22 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.