Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.48s
Reply Brief — Nebrasks v. Parker, 136 S. Ct. 27 (2015) (No. 14-1406)
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2015
Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994)............ eee passim Lamplot v. Heineman, 06-cv-3075 (D. Neb. EI aI RR Lo 0 OO TOOT 10 Matiz v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994), South Dakota v. Yankton Sioux Tribe, 522 U.S. 329 (1998), and City of Sherrill, N.Y. v.
Reply Brief — Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn.
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 2001
See CP 11-14; Bnef for Petitioner at 24-26; Bnef of Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Daniel Casse, CP 9-12-E. … Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923), and Pierce v. a Athletics can provide ... exposure to ideas and the motivation to learn.
531 U.S. 288Opposition Brief — Munroe v. Raphael
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1933
(Ree. p. 24, par. 3.) … S. 93, 24 S. Ct. 5 399, 2 Aline v. Burke, 260 U.S. 226; 43 S. Ct. 79. B.
288 U.S. 485Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Bugryn v. City of Bristol
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2001
Id. at 23-24 n.5. … Stamford, 159 Conn. 116, 125, 267 A.2d 443, cert. denied, 399 U.S. 905, 90 S. Ct. 2197, 26 L.
534 U.S. 1019Opposition — Cain v. Mazurkiewicz
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
- IN ORDER TO ROB HIM, IN THE COURSE OF THE ROBBERY AND IN THE PRESENCE OF PETITIONER, GLENN EDWARDS WAS FATALLY SHOT BY CAL- VIN WILLIAMS, ONE OF THE CONSPIRATORS, SOME TIME AFTER MIDNIGHT ON May 24 … FUNCTION, THE MATIHEWS HOLDING OFFENDS THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLES OF FEDERALISM AS CLASSICALLY EXPRESSED BY Mr, Justice HoLmes IN Ms- SOURL, Kansas, AND Texas Raiway Co, v, Nay, 194 U.S, 267, 270, 24
440 U.S. 971Record and brief — Taylor v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
The officers asked the three men why they were parked @ 24 < there, but the men gave answers which the officers testified were unsatisfac- tory and evasive. … of crime was concealed in the auto. 399 U.S. 42, 46.
456 U.S. 906IN THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SUPREME COURT
Tribal code · Tribal code
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953).
Jurisdictional Statement — Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969
Property Search Warrants, 367 U.S:717, _ ‘81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Bd.24 1127, .......... 4,5 Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 ieee y seks ee 5,14 Mills v. … _ Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 86 S.Ct. 5 18, 5 L.Ed.2d 447. 4.
394 U.S. 102Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alfred Montgomery,III, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 8, 2021
Ct. 399 (2018) ....................................................... passim United States v. … Ct. 399, 407 (2018) (summarizing the Iowa statute at issue in Mathis).
Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Local Union No, 399, 330 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. Ill. 1971). … Local Union No. 399, 330 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. Ill. 1971). 4.
415 U.S. 916Amicus Curiae Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968) ............ 17 Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., a ies t SOU ee eae ce ie eee 18 Securities Indus. Ass’n v. … § 24(Seventh).
508 U.S. 971Amicus Curiae Brief — Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. American Land Title Ass'n
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
Agents, 399 F.2d 1010 (Sth Cir. 1968) ............. 17 Schreiber v. Burlington Northern, Inc., CF2 U.S. 8 tere eee ek een 18 Securities Indus. Ass’n v. … § 24(Seventh).
508 U.S. 971Amicus Curiae Brief — Canada Packers, Ltd. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1966
FREE Pe NL GA ge A aE EN 12 _ Statutes: .° ° + * Act to regulate commeryee, 1887, 24 Stat. 379_________ 6 . … Co., 185 1.C.C. 399; Sherman Lbr. Co. v. At- lantic Coast Line R. Co., 293 1.C.C. 261, 263, 264; Chas. H. Lilly Co. v. Great Northern Ry.
385 U.S. 182Amicus Curiae Brief — Bell v. Cone
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002
Clark, 478 U.S. 570 (1986) 24 Salinas v. State, 773 S.W.2d 779 (Tex. Ct. App. ED entetcnsnsertiseeteanmenencscces 18 Scarpa v. … Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 395-399 9 (2000); Burger v. Kemp, 483 U.S. 776, 788 (1987); Darden v. Wainwright, 477 U.S. 168, 184 (1986); Strick- land, 466 U.S. at 698-699.
535 U.S. 685Brief Amicus Curiae — In Re GAULT
Supreme Court brief · Brief Amicus Curiae · 1967
D. 24 8,9 (App. ° Div. 8rd Dept., N. Y. Sup. Ct.1966).* ; Rte - = ° S e . > : on : ; 1. ents in delinquency proceedings. … Ct.) 24 Dept., N. Y. L. J. for July 15, 1966, .
387 U.S. 1Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 18, 2022
Cnty. of Albany, 687 F.3d 565 (2d Cir. 2012) ...........................23, 24 Pope v. Cnty. of Albany, 94 F. Supp. 3d 302 (N.D.N.Y. 2015) ........20, 24, 28 Pope v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 432 (2006) (expanding the com6 22 1.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Quintin I. Brown, Petitioner v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 14, 2020
TT 18, 24. Officer Sentipal had a vehicle camera, or a “dash-cam,” running that day and that was submitted as Commonwealth’s Exhibit #2 at trial. TT 19, 34. … App. 789, 800, 520 S.E.2d 393, 399 (1999). Guilty knowledge is an essential element of receiving stolen property.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Swacker v. Pennroad Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1948
S. 262 24 Ss Florida East Coast Line v. United States, 234 U. S. FS pee caplciecsninenaatsiin 22 2 Gugle v. Loeser, 140 Ohio State 362 23 bs: Hereford v. … The Vice-Chancellor added (R. 399): ‘*Hastings contends that they agreed to share the work equally.
333 U.S. 862Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Apr 8, 2022
Arizona, 567 U.S. at 399. … Effects of Radiofrequency Radiation, 100 F.C.C.2d 543, ¶¶ 2-3, 24 (1985).
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Aug 20, 2026
This Court protects parents’ right to direct their children’s upbringing whether or not religious. ............................. 20 CONCLUSION ......................................................... 24 … (quoting Pierce, 268 U.S. at 534–35) (citing Meyer, 262 U.S. at 399–400).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.