Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
2.06s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 13, 2004
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked “late.” … after the close of the comment period.
69 FR 72140Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 1, 2015
to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise. … Background Eight years after an area is redesignated to attainment, Clean Air Act (CAA) section 175A(b) requires the state to submit a subsequent maintenance plan to EPA, covering a second 10-year period
80 FR 17331Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 22, 2020
Background Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 110 provides a framework for how states must adopt and periodically revise their SIPs with a goal of attaining and maintaining the NAAQS. 4 State regulatory … Cleaning of control equipment which does not require the shutdown of the process equipment shall be limited to one six-minute period per one-hour period.
85 FR 37405Environmental Protection AgencyClimate Change: Comparison of the Cap-and-Trade Provisions in H.R. 2454 and S. 1733
Congressional research report · CRS Report · Nov 5, 2009
Clean Air Act. … and two major changes to the Clean Air Act.
R40896Congressional Research ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 28, 2011
Rule 3170 is a local fee rule submitted to address section 185 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … Page, Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, to Air Division Directors, “Guidance on Developing Fee Programs Required by Clean Air Act Section 185 for the 1-hour Ozone NAAQS,” January
76 FR 45212Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 6, 1997
The I/M program start up condition is not imposed pursuant to a commitment to correct a deficient SIP under section 110(k)(4) of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
62 FR 59996Environmental Protection AgencySupreme Court brief · Reply Brief · Nov 1, 2023
Moreover, the Clean Air Act specifically authorizes judicial review of claims “based solely on grounds arising” after the comment period and initial deadline for judicial review, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b)(1) … (“APA”) and the Clean Air Act.
Federal Register · Rule · May 15, 2007
Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 27247Environmental Protection AgencyNational Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Secondary Aluminum Production
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 23, 2000
This rule allows permitting authorities the discretion to defer Clean Air Act (CAA) title V operating permitting requirements until December 9, 2004, for area sources of air pollution subject to this NESHAP … The EPA is required under section 112(d) of the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions of HAPs listed in section 112(b).
65 FR 15690Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 5, 2013
Does the plan meet the Clean Air Act requirements for contingency provisions? … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
78 FR 47259Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 14, 2013
These revisions are consistent with the Clean Air Act and CAIR. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
78 FR 68367Environmental Protection AgencyUse of Ozone-Depleting Substances
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 26, 2016
Air Act. … under the Clean Air Act.
81 FR 74364Health and Human Services DepartmentFood and Drug AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 24, 2012
EPA is proposing these determinations under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 23, 2012. … EPA designated this area as nonattainment for one-hour ozone following the enactment of the Clean Air Act (CAA) Amendments of 1990.
77 FR 3417Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 20, 2001
EPA is approving these revisions to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Air Act.
66 FR 43502Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Uncategorized Document · Jul 5, 1994
This action is being taken under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act. DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 4, 1994. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Thomas J. … Section 211(m) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 15, 1995
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
60 FR 8566Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Oct 5, 1998
Air Act. … Air Act.
63 FR 53282Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Florida: Jacksonville Area Maintenance Plan Update
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 22, 2003
The Jacksonville Area (Duval County) was designated as nonattainment for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS prior to the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendment. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 43312Environmental Protection AgencyPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Reilly v. Delaney
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990
public comment period will close in early November. … The Clean Air Act explicitly requires that all federal ac- tivities conform to Clean Air Act Implementation Plans. 42 U.S.C. § 7506(c).
498 U.S. 998Petition — United States Steel Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Air Act. 2. … SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977 (the 1977 Amendments), Pub.
444 U.S. 1035
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.