Documents

Oral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.

Oral argument — Lawn Managers, Inc. v. Progressive Lawn Managers, Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 17, 2019

That wasn't due to wrongful acts of the plaintiff. That was due to the acts in compliant with that divorce decree. … a period of time, and then the new name going forward after that.

Oral argument — Yubo Miao v. UAL

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2025

Because they, in fact, as alleged in the complaint, someone made a comment to him that there was this disrespectful tone and interaction. … Well, I, I would say that he acted reasonably in, in initially putting it on the seat and waiting until another passenger came.

Oral argument — RIVERSIDE SHERIFF'S v. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2005

But if I charge the cop with stealing from the evidence locker, and it gets washed out in an early stage, he's somehow entitled to a clean record. … Just a few brief comments.

Oral argument — Catherine Petzel v. Redflex Traffic Systems

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2016

So in Does COFLEX arguably have two contracts during the performance improvement period while she at best has one? … Petzl testifies she never had any gender-related comments of any kind from Rosenberg.

Oral argument — Fernando Lopez v. Sheriff of Cook County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2020

Lopez was in, we would have acted the same. We would have fired a gun in the air to disperse attackers. … Lopez's circumstances, I would have shot a gun in the air, maybe even toward people, because it's consistent with ACT, so that they dispersed and then attempted to get in my car and drive away.

Oral argument — SEC v. Lemelson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 10, 2025

and also acted in bad faith, and thus fees would not have been appropriate here. … And on those questions, I think it's fairly obvious from the briefing, this panel is riding on essentially a clean slate.

Oral argument — Royster v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2011

And meanwhile, and this sort of dovetails with the conditions claim, there are a lot of other people in this period, this period within the statute of limitations, becoming affected. … It's sort of a side comment, is my understanding. Well, but the side comment's in the record.

Oral argument — Smith v. DG Louisiana

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 5, 2024

Whether he acted reasonable, whether your client acted reasonable, that's really grist for the jury mill. I cannot dispute that. That's a jury determination. And that he did testify. … But what I'm saying is when you have such a unique case here where a fall occurs at the same time as the negligent act and you can't prove the time period because it's happening right then.

Oral argument — Villarreal v. Texas

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2025

So our view is that you just have a right to talk about your testimony, period, right? … It's been a very clean rule, unlike the rule that Texas and even the United States advocates.

Oral argument — Paul Hansmeier, Esq. v. John Doe

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 4, 2015

Ryan says, essentially, Lockery is no longer good law, period, full stop. … But so to come back to how the Copyright Act plays in, right?

Oral argument — Sing Fuels Pte Ltd. v. M/V LILA SHANGHAI (IMO 9541318)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2022

They looked at the Jones Act, said that three years was enough. … They've got the time period. They've got the clock running.

Oral argument — Blunt v. Lower Merion School District

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 11, 2013

They act as individuals. There was no testimony that any of these people did any acts on their own or did any acts as representatives or on behalf of the organization. … So again, there was no factual airing of this. There was one deposition taken on the issue of class certification. But there was no motion, there was no factual airing.

Oral argument — Collazo-Rosado v. University of Puerto Rico

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 2, 2014

Students come up during the periods when she's not there. The employer has a legitimate need to see that there's somebody there. … Gomez was just acting like a supervisor, as someone wanted to be able to evaluate the performance of Mrs. Collazo.

Oral argument — United States v. Marino

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

That list of the serial numbers that Dell provided didn't materialize out of thin air. It wasn't constructed after an examination of the defendant's premises. … His probation officer at the time commented that he had failed to adjust, to make a proper adjustment to supervised release at that time.

Oral argument — Alexsey Predybaylo v. County of Sacramento

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2023

They held him up in the air, probably 12 to 16 inches in the air would be my best guess. Maybe a little bit more. And they let go. … We have to show, and we have shown, that they physically did these things, these physical acts, which endangered my client and were unnecessary. Yes, for example, in Rice v.

Oral argument — Campaign Legal Center v. 45Committee, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

Second, the district court erred in determining that the FEC acted during the conformance period, despite failing to obtain the majority vote required for it to exercise its authority under FECA. … With respect to the second issue, district court erred in determining that the FEC acted when it deadlocked on whether to find reason to believe during the conformance period.

Oral argument — Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2014

I believe originally there was in the underlying case that there was a claim for the non-renewal period. … Under the performance requirements summary, it states, properties are maintained in clean, safe, sanitary condition. Performance measure.

Oral argument — People v. Tapley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 10, 2020

Can you tell me the relevance of the statement RL had been online making suicidal comments? What's the relevance of that? … You would not have showed up at her door had not been making suicidal comments.

Oral argument — Barbara Marks v. Wanda Hudson

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2019

The police came by and told Barbara he should be spanked and told the kid to clean up the mess. That's important. And then all of a sudden we have Ms. … I understand your comment, but still I think, you know, if, if there was, if there was cause to remove one child, because like Judge Higginson said, it was a close quarrel.