Documents

Oral argument — White Oak Realty, L.L.C. v. U.S. Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

Simultaneously with the end of that period in 2008, the Corps of Engineers had been tasked with rebuilding the levees that had suffered damage during Katrina. It was an enormous project. … It was partially open fields, about 40 acres, partially wetlands, about 100 acres, and partially habitat type called bottomland hardwood dry, i.e. that these are uplands not within its Clean Water Act

Oral argument — Alexsey Predybaylo v. County of Sacramento

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2023

They held him up in the air, probably 12 to 16 inches in the air would be my best guess. Maybe a little bit more. And they let go. … We have to show, and we have shown, that they physically did these things, these physical acts, which endangered my client and were unnecessary. Yes, for example, in Rice v.

Oral argument — Campaign Legal Center v. 45Committee, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2024

Second, the district court erred in determining that the FEC acted during the conformance period, despite failing to obtain the majority vote required for it to exercise its authority under FECA. … With respect to the second issue, district court erred in determining that the FEC acted when it deadlocked on whether to find reason to believe during the conformance period.

Oral argument — Chapman Law Firm, LPA v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2014

I believe originally there was in the underlying case that there was a claim for the non-renewal period. … Under the performance requirements summary, it states, properties are maintained in clean, safe, sanitary condition. Performance measure.

Oral argument — Brown v. Davenport

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2021

If you were writing on a clean slate, how would you coordinate Brecht and ACPA? Would you say that, for example, that one subsumes the other? … Counsel, would you comment or respond to Justice Alito's point as to the stature or status of Brecht as an equitable doctrine in comparison with EDPA, which is statutory?

Oral argument — In re Estate of Compton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 11, 2012

And what the railroad does is come into the plant, hook onto it, and pull it out without saying anything to anybody around it, or attempting to clean it up when it's in their possession, because that's … the slow-acting asbestos, whether they have to say something before they take the action that releases the asbestos into the air where these people breathe it and it contributes to their illness the same

Oral argument — Breckenridge Pharmaceutical v. FDA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2018

And here, right, and so that has been stated that 14 days is not a safe period. That's the definition of a prescription drug. … question about whether or not this statute is going to be upheld or not, we would ask for a stay pending the November 2nd date so that we don't turn this whole big system upside down and then have to clean

Oral argument — United States v. Chikosi Legins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2021

He was forced to perform oral sex on the defendant for a period of time, after which they then moved to a different section of the room, after which he was forcefully anally raped for five minutes, according … to the victim, after which they cleaned up, after which Mr.

Oral argument — Carter v. ALK Holdings

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 1, 2010

I don't understand what the significance of that comment is by Judge Camp. … It's exactly the same situation in the air pressure case.

Oral argument — DCH Regional Medical Center v. Alex Michael Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

There was a notice and comment period. We submitted a comment, and it was effectively ignored. So it's a federal rule? Yes. And that is the rule that we're challenging. … It was a form to accept notice and comment by March 3rd. Right. Right.

Oral argument — A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025

Because the way they define deliberate indifference sounds a lot like someone acting in bad faith. Your Honor, can I just add one additional comment on your earlier question and then answer that one? … So if you're going to rule against us, at least wipe the slate clean and say, they want to say you have to follow Title VI because they don't make difference in terms of parties and you have to use intent

Oral argument — United States v. Bordonici

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

The case law is a little bit in conflict with saying that, well, he's going to be deported for acts prior to 1993. … But if you look at what happened in that period of time, the immigration wasn't involved.

Oral argument — United States v. Lopez-Mendez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 18, 2024

Drain was on supervision for a period of eight months before they sought this modification. In the Thomas case, that was like happening at the time of sentencing. … There's mentions of him sexually acting out. Yes, he then goes to industry. What, sexually acting out when he was 15? Yes. So talk about now. What was he doing now that suddenly required this?

Oral argument — United States v. Silvestre Avila Herrera

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010

Is your client going to be better served by going back with a clean sheet of paper and letting a different judge make a brand new calculation? … We're going to act like it makes a difference. Well, can I respond to that? A couple of points.

Oral argument — Delil v. Point Reyes Seashore Lodge

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2007

Even the comments to Rule 54c of the local rules provides that the parties should be aware that the time is short. … There will be a warning to district judges that if they're trying to clean up their calendar, don't do it, because — Right. There is — there is another way.

Oral argument — Lincoln Provisions v. Philip Wolfstein

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2014

And so between that time period and now, there has been a four-year delay. And so that delay is real. It's not hypothetical. … Wolfstein, which the district court determined was culpable and, in fact, acted in bad faith for evading service.

Oral argument — Muriel Seto v. Laura Thielen

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 13, 2013

You know, one of the things that the court asked you for was clarification about the Coastal Zone Management Act and the Historic Preservation Act and your claim under the Clean Water Act and so on, and … So any comments that the attorney general made, who I've accused of covering up fines of $10,000 a day after the Supreme Court, he's the principal attorney over there, after they ordered him to follow

Oral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any, as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.

Oral argument — Hans Schink v. Commissioner of Social Security

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 30, 2019

But again, there has to be evidence presented that substantiates a 12-month period. But can you pick and choose which pieces you want to rely on? … Well, you know, you make the comment about the sporadic nature of the treatment as a reason why not to attach weight to it.

Oral argument — United States v. Mabelle Dann

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2011

I think that unless the court actually goes after an asset which is provided for under the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act, that a restitution order beyond the scope of that act, and it reaches an asset … There's a course of conduct that began with the visa petition in Peru and ends with that comment. And again, there are two narratives, and the jury accepted one of them. That's the problem.