Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.66s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 3, 1999
South Dakota submitted this plan to meet section 111(d) of the Clean Air Act (Act) and EPA's Emission Guidelines for existing MSW landfills at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cc. … We will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. We will not institute a second comment period on this action.
64 FR 29822Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 18, 2014
These revisions do not have an adverse affect on air quality. EPA's approval of these SIP revisions is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
79 FR 15092Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 24, 2012
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: April 4, 2012. A.
77 FR 24440Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 19, 2013
Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
78 FR 23524Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 14, 2013
Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
78 FR 28173Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 7, 2008
Air Act (CAA) for the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) moderate 1997 8-hour ozone nonattainment area. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
73 FR 58515Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 25, 2015
This rule is being proposed for rescision because the Federal Clean Air Mercury Rule, which is the basis for this rule and associated plan, has been vacated and removed from the Code of Federal Regulations … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
80 FR 57767Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 1, 2011
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
76 FR 67396Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 25, 2009
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before April 24, 2009. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
74 FR 12776Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 27, 2009
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 30, 2009. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
74 FR 8888Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 10, 2007
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 10, 2007. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
72 FR 51574Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; North Carolina; Prong 4–2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 PM2.5
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 8, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) visibility transport (prong 4) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), and 2012 … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 8 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
81 FR 20600Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Georgia; Prong 4– 2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 PM2.5
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 11, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) visibility transport (prong 4) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), and 2012 … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 9 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
81 FR 44831Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 7, 1997
This action is being taken under Section 110 of the Clean Air Act. a. Oregon I/M and Clean Air Act Requirements Background. … Washington I/M and Clean Air Act Requirements Background Section 182(a)(2)(B) of the Clean Air Act requires any O3 nonattainment area which has been classified as ``marginal'' or worse (pursuant to section
62 FR 10501Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 21, 2004
We are proposing to approve rule rescissions and negative declarations to update the California SIP under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 56381Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Indiana; Second Maintenance Plan for 2008 Ozone NAAQS
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 21, 2025
EPA is proposing to approve this maintenance plan because it provides for the maintenance of the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the area for 10 additional years as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA). … of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
90 FR 52582Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 4, 2005
EPA is proposing these actions as a strengthening of the SIP in accordance with the requirements of sections 110 and 116 of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act). … Clean Air Act.
70 FR 23075Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 24, 2015
Air Act (CAA) for the 2006 fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
80 FR 51156Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 19, 2011
The petition also states that existing domestic laws which grant authority to require greenhouse gas emissions reductions (e.g., Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Endangered Species Act, Energy Policy and … Specific regulations to limit greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act were only proposed in 2010.
76 FR 78601Interior DepartmentFish and Wildlife ServiceFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 14, 2005
We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
70 FR 60036Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.