Documents

Oral argument — Charles M. Ivey, III v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2016

And Massey defined 1-25 of the Act, which was the transfer definition at that time. … As a matter of fact, Judge Osteen made the comment.

Oral argument — Hill v. OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

The cough and trouble sleeping, and that these were his symptoms over a very long period of time. … Basically, that his air sacs were severely compromised. A number of them had been blocked and were no longer functioning.

Oral argument — Salem v. Terhune

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2003

So wake up at 4 a.m. and drive all the way to the Air Force Base. No problem, right? Well, the fact is, and he did do that. … Hicks refused to release plaintiff as she was out that act, but referred to it as an act of Congress.

Oral argument — Westcott v. US Dept of Interior

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

And in doing so, it sought substantial public comment and input. … And plainly something happened because the numbers weren't pulled out of thin air.

Oral argument — etc.) ORY v. McDONALD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2005

Diamond, the new sound recording, is a separate copyrightable work, and accordingly there's a separate act of infringement. … Another reason, a new derivative work is created under the Copyright Act and under Mirage.

Oral argument — United States v. Thanh

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 12, 2004

So it's real plain air. … At trial transcript 15169, the prosecutor herself asked, and you thought at a later period of time when it was the home invasion, it must have been about the particular black BMW.

Oral argument — Bridges v. DVA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 5, 2007

They would have seen a clean bill of health. They would have asked for all his childhood medical records. … He might have had a personality disorder or condition in 1950, but over a period of more than 45 years, he developed depression.

Oral argument — United States v. Chikosi Legins

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2021

He was forced to perform oral sex on the defendant for a period of time, after which they then moved to a different section of the room, after which he was forcefully anally raped for five minutes, according … to the victim, after which they cleaned up, after which Mr.

Oral argument — IN RE RENEWABLE ENERGY GROUP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2022

Based on defendant's class period statements, investors believed that defendants had properly done so during the class period. … For that reason, the company, in sum, at least acted recklessly for the entire class period, if not having actual knowledge from June 2020 or September 2020.

Oral argument — United States v. Bordonici

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

The case law is a little bit in conflict with saying that, well, he's going to be deported for acts prior to 1993. … But if you look at what happened in that period of time, the immigration wasn't involved.

Oral argument — DCH Regional Medical Center v. Alex Michael Azar, II, in his official capacity as Secretary of Health and Human Services

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2018

There was a notice and comment period. We submitted a comment, and it was effectively ignored. So it's a federal rule? Yes. And that is the rule that we're challenging. … It was a form to accept notice and comment by March 3rd. Right. Right.

Oral argument — United States v. David Long

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2021

Now, there have been 3,247 grants of sentence reductions or compassionate release applications since the First Step Act. In addition, due to COVID-19, 20 inmates at the Springfield facility where Mr. … The clean record, disciplinary record, the pursuit of rehabilitative programs and education, the ties to a law-abiding family in the community and a support network.

Oral argument — United States v. Peter Burno

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 7, 2022

It's on plein air review. We don't think that there was any plein air. … And kind of a final point, logically, any- Well, first, in a conspiracy, you don't have to commit the acts or the objects. So it's just an agreement to commit those acts.

Oral argument — D'Alessandro v. City of New Yo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 26, 2017

There's a version of the indictment, of the first one, not the superseding ones, perfect, clean, you know. … There was also argument that the defendant, the criminal defendant, had consented to different periods.

Oral argument — Nelson v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2018

I want to make a couple comments about the factual discussions the Court just had with my colleague. … Milbacher didn't do anything because he was acting in good faith. And I'm going to get back to that in a second.

Oral argument — Aaron Voltz v. Erie County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2015

And what you call the discriminatory act here is discussing this with the board? … As I recall the record, there was, in effect, a sit-down saying, okay, you're cleared, but you better keep your nose clean, henceforth. Who was in that meeting and committee?

Oral argument — Royal Continental Box v. Workers' Compensation Comm'n

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2012

The issues kind of factually and legally tie into each other, so I think that I'll probably end up addressing a lot of those in my opening comments. … It is agreed that he was injured when he stepped back into a bucket of chemical cleaning solution and sustained a burn.

Oral argument — United States v. Louis Holger Eklund

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2023

It seems to me that appellate counsel, trial counsel, you have to always act in the client's best interest, right? Would you agree with that? Of course. I didn't mean to suggest otherwise. Okay. … Becker, in that period for the first competency hearing, or no, I guess the second one at that point, said tenuously competent.

Oral argument — City of Chicago v. Federal National Mortgage Assoc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2017

Well, they were entitled, but whether they were an owner for purposes of the Demolition Act is an open question that's at issue in this appeal. … During that period, Fannie Mae did not answer the complaint.

Oral argument — Sullivan v. etectRx, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023

So, Your Honor, I think this period refers to the period of time in which E-Tech RX was going to be exploring all options. … That's the ambit of the Wage Act.