Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.97s
Notice of Approval for Other Use of Phosphogypsum
Federal Register · Notice · Dec 23, 2024
The Agency's review found that Mosaic's request is complete per the requirements of EPA's National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants under the Clean Air Act, and that the potential radiological … The EPA's regulations under the Clean Air Act at 40 CFR part 61, subpart R (hereafter “Subpart R”) require that phosphogypsum must be disposed of in engineered piles, called stacks, to limit public exposure
89 FR 104535Environmental Protection AgencyTreatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 22, 2007
AQS Air Quality System. BACM Best Available Control Measures. CAA Clean Air Act. CAAA Clean Air Act Amendments. EPA Environmental Protection Agency. FEM Federal Equivalent Methods. … Comments and Responses Comment: Several commenters indicated that EPA should limit the time period associated with clean-up activities due to a natural disaster.
72 FR 13560Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 1, 1995
This revision was submitted to comply with the RACT ``Catch-up'' provisions of the Clean Air Act (the Act). There are two intended effects of this action. … Background The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 were enacted on November 15, 1990. Public Law 101-549, 104 Stat. 2399, codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401- 7671q.
60 FR 6022Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 12, 2002
Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received a comment from the SCAQMD correcting the adoption date for Rule 109. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 6410Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Regional Haze
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 22, 2012
The NPS commented that Clean Air Markets data indicates that MK1 is not meeting the 0.15 lb/MMBtu target. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
77 FR 50602Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 17, 2018
The public comment period for this proposed rulemaking ended on October 29, 2018. The EPA received one comment from an anonymous commenter. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 64470Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa County Area
Federal Register · Rule · Mar 31, 2014
We are approving local statutes that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on April 30, 2014. … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted.
79 FR 17878Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Mar 24, 2020
These revisions concern the District's New Source Review (NSR) permitting program for new and modified sources of air pollution under section 110(a)(2)(C) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. We received two comments during this public comment period.
85 FR 16555Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Feb 24, 2023
Public comments were previously requested via the Federal Register on August 26, 2022, during a 60-day comment period (87 FR 52552). … Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (section 114(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7414(a)(1)). Estimated number of respondents: 117 (total).
88 FR 11915Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 9, 2022
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. … We received three comments during this period, and each one was supportive of this proposed action. III.
87 FR 27526Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York: Clean Air Interstate Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 1, 2007
It does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
72 FR 55723Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 30, 2001
This action is being taken in accordance with the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 1, 2001. … Opening of the Public Comment Period The EPA is opening a comment period for 30 days to take comment on the Commonwealth's July 19, 2001 RACM submittal discussed above.
66 FR 45797Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 13, 2024
reading” of the Clean Air Act. … As the comment referenced, RACM/RACT is required under Clean Air Act section 172(c)(1) for nonattainment areas.
89 FR 74836Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · May 4, 2001
Therefore, NESHAP standards were promulgated for this source category, as required under section 112 of the Clean Air Act. … In the absence of such information enforcement personnel would be unable to determine whether the standards are being met on a continuous basis, as required by the Clean Air Act.
66 FR 22548Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Aug 15, 2002
Air Act by increasing its throughput or hours of operation. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
67 FR 53312Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Apr 2, 2013
This action is in accordance with section 110 of the federal Clean Air Act (the Act, CAA). DATES: This rule will be effective on May 2, 2013. … action during its comment period.
78 FR 19599Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 4, 1999
Background On March 3, 1978, EPA promulgated a list of ozone nonattainment areas under the provisions of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1977 (1977 Act or pre-amended Act), that included the South … All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this rule.
64 FR 23774Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 29, 2026
Public Comment The public comment period for the proposed rulemaking opened on July 16, 2025, 6 the date of its publication in the Federal Register , and closed on August 15, 2025. … During this period, the EPA received two comment submissions, including one comment submission from an anonymous private citizen 7 and one comment letter from San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution
91 FR 3836Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; California; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Jul 2, 2019
We are approving local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We are also approving revisions to a definitions rule. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period that closed on January 28, 2019. During this period, we received eight comments.
84 FR 31682Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plan for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Florida
Federal Register · Rule · Apr 14, 2003
Background On December 1, 2000, pursuant to sections 111 and 129 of the Clean Air Act (Act), EPA promulgated new source performance standards (NSPS) applicable to new CISWIs and EG applicable to existing … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 17883Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.