Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.17s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 21, 2000
The Connecticut DEP submitted the Plan to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not begin a second comment period. DATES: EPA must receive comments in writing by May 22, 2000. ADDRESSES: You should address your written comments to: Mr.
65 FR 21383Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 24, 2012
This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: April 4, 2012. A.
77 FR 24440Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 1, 2012
We are proposing to approve two local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
77 FR 12526Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans For Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Florida
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 15, 2000
The Plan was submitted by the Florida DEP to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by December 15, 2000.
65 FR 68959Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Alabama
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 10, 2000
The Plan was submitted by the ADEM to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by May 10, 2000.
65 FR 18956Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Georgia
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 19, 1998
The Plan was submitted by the Georgia DNR to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by June 18, 1998.
63 FR 27542Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Florida
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 4, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the Florida DEP to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by July 6, 1999.
64 FR 29976Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants: Tennessee
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 30, 1999
The Plan was submitted by the Tennessee DEC to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments must be received in writing by November 1, 1999. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be addressed to Steven M.
64 FR 52738Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 7, 2013
We are proposing to approve four local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
78 FR 921Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approvals; TN; Prong 4-2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 2, 2017
Air Act (CAA or Act) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), and 2012 annual Fine Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) National … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 8 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
82 FR 12328Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Missouri
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 18, 2014
These revisions do not have an adverse affect on air quality. EPA's approval of these SIP revisions is being done in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
79 FR 15092Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Revisions; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 22, 2022
The EPA previously proposed to fully approve these SIP revisions on the grounds that they satisfied the relevant requirements under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … “State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,” 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2.
87 FR 51300Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 4, 2004
PM-10 Air Quality Planning in the SJV Area In 1990, Congress amended the Clean Air Act to address, among other things, continued nonattainment of the PM-10 NAAQS. 2 Pub. … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
69 FR 5412Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 21, 2004
We are proposing to approve rule rescissions and negative declarations to update the California SIP under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 56381Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 14, 2005
EPA is also proposing to approve Indiana's maintenance plan SIP revisions for Greene and Jackson Counties (such approval being one of the Clean Air Act criteria for redesignation to attainment status). … The Adequacy comment periods for these MVEBs ended on September, 1 2005. No requests for these submittals or adverse comments on these submittals were received during the Adequacy comment periods.
70 FR 69130Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans; Alaska
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 5, 1995
The SIP revision was submitted by the state to satisfy certain federal Clean Air Act requirements for a basic motor vehicle inspection and maintenance (I/M) program in the Municipality of Anchorage and … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this notice. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by May 5, 1995.
60 FR 17289Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 30, 2007
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before October 1, 2007. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
72 FR 50084Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 10, 2012
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing approval of revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP) under the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … EPA does not intend to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action must do so at this time.
77 FR 73391Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; ID; State Board Composition
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 17, 2023
Clean Air Act. … Air Act.
88 FR 10256Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 12, 2010
EPA is proposing to approve these two actions pursuant to section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 13, 2010. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 48894Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.