Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.12s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 10, 2013
(RACT) requirements of the Clean Air Act (Act). … Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What is the background for this action?
78 FR 55234Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of California Air Plan Revisions, Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Feb 12, 2018
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective on March 14, 2018. … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
83 FR 5940Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 29, 2006
We are approving local rules that regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments and EPA Responses EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III.
71 FR 51120Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Feb 26, 2010
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve delegation requests that comply with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations … Thus, in reviewing delegation submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
75 FR 8807Environmental Protection AgencyOuter Continental Shelf Air Regulations Consistency Update for California
Federal Register · Rule · Jun 18, 2009
”), as mandated by section 328(a)(1) of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (“the Act”). … Public Comment EPA's proposed actions provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments on the proposed actions. III.
74 FR 28875Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Nov 27, 2009
EPA is not redesignating the area under section 107(d)(3)(E) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … attached those comments to its comments on EPA's proposed clean data determination.
74 FR 62243Environmental Protection AgencyI/M Program RequirementOn-Board Diagnostic Checks
Federal Register · Rule · Aug 6, 1996
Air Act. … Response to Comments Section 202(m)(3) of the Clean Air Act requires OBD testing as a component of all I/M programs.
61 FR 40940Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 29, 2010
This action is being taken under section 110 of the Clean Air Act. … or refer to the Clean Air Act, unless the context indicates otherwise.
75 FR 4698Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Notice · Aug 21, 2013
(B) Scope of Preemption and Criteria for a Waiver Under the Clean Air Act Section 209(a) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (“Act”), 42 U.S.C. 7543(a), provides: No state or any political subdivision … Air Act.
78 FR 51724Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Sep 4, 2024
On September 24, 2018, ADEQ submitted the “Arizona State Implementation Plan Revision under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2) for the 2015 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards.” … Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period that ended on January 4, 2023. During this period, the EPA received one anonymous comment.
89 FR 71830Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jan 15, 2021
Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no comments. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
86 FR 3816Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; ME; Regional Haze 5-Year Progress Report
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 20, 2017
Maine's SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 33471Environmental Protection AgencyNotice of Final Approval for an Alternative Means of Emission Limitation
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 19, 2021
Air Act (CAA) for an alternative means of emission limitation (AMEL) for the Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels. … Air Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations EPA Environmental Protection Agency HAP hazardous air pollutant(s) NESHAP national emission standards for hazardous air pollutants NSPS new source performance
86 FR 38076Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans: Oregon
Federal Register · Rule · May 16, 1996
The Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires the states to promulgate conformity rules to ensure that Federal actions conform to the appropriate State Implementation Plan (SIP). … The EPA has reviewed this request for revision of the federally- approved SIP for conformance with the provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments enacted on November 15, 1990.
61 FR 24709Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Ohio; Regional Haze Five-Year Progress Report State Implementation Plan
Federal Register · Rule · Dec 21, 2017
Ohio's SIP revision addresses requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) and EPA's rules that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress toward reasonable progress goals (RPGs) established … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations
82 FR 60543Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Dec 6, 2002
We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … Public Comments EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received no adverse comments. III.
67 FR 72573Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · Jun 3, 2003
These revisions are designed for the State Implementation Plan (SIP) to attain the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 33008Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Idaho; Interstate Transport Requirements for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS
Federal Register · Rule · Sep 24, 2018
The public comment period for the proposal ended August 17, 2018. II. Response to Comments We received two comments on the rulemaking. … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable federal regulations
83 FR 48240Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Connecticut; Regional Haze Five Year Progress Report
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 25, 2019
This revision addresses the provisions of the Clean Air Act and its implementing regulations that require states to submit periodic reports describing progress on reasonable progress goals established … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
84 FR 50363Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Rule · May 20, 2003
EPA is approving this revision to establish RACT requirements in the SIP in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA). … In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
68 FR 27471Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.