Documents

Oral argument — Mark Gyves v. City of Houston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2019

Why not just argue – I don't have any more comments about that, but it's unusual. Why not just focus on whether there's a constitutional violation? … And let me address just the comment from opposing counsel on the fact that the sanction appears as a lifetime ban.

Oral argument — Roland Alonso v. Westcoast Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018

Let me ask you about the Louisiana Prop Payment Act. … Are you saying that RCS had to have their people out there for this whole period without knowing when the delay was going to end?

Oral argument — State of New Hampshire v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

That needs to, and it can be for or it can be relating to, to the acts allegedly undertaken at behest of a federal officer, and that's not the case here. … I understood that Judge McCafferty was saying that there's a period during which you may move to see if you wish, but I did not have the sense that we were guaranteed a stay.

Oral argument — McGunigle v. City of Quincy

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2016

He gets a clean bill of health from him. In 2012, all of a sudden, Keenan doesn't need a medical professional. He can just, and he does, just terminate his handgun license. … The allegation is that even though it's five years, they were chipping away at him for over the five-year period of time. And this was finally the coup de grace.

Oral argument — Warbelow's Air v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

We're dealing with airport property, air reservation property, 43 U.S.C. … I believe that another part of the air navigation strip is also owned by the federal government.

Oral argument — County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

ever enters into a contract for a limited duration for a small amount, does that entitle federal jurisdiction, even though in the grand scheme of things it's very, very tiny and for a short, limited period … A very brief comment about the scope of review. As Judge Ikuda pointed out, the Yamaha case analyzed a different statute, 1292B, with very different policy concerns.

Oral argument — United States v. Ikeviaun Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024

And your honor, the plein air conceded by the government is the first two elements of plein air relief. That there was air and it was plein and Mr. … But I want to circle back just briefly to Judge Nemar's comment about the jury instructions and highlight one thing.

Oral argument — White Oak Realty, L.L.C. v. U.S. Army Corps

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2018

Simultaneously with the end of that period in 2008, the Corps of Engineers had been tasked with rebuilding the levees that had suffered damage during Katrina. It was an enormous project. … It was partially open fields, about 40 acres, partially wetlands, about 100 acres, and partially habitat type called bottomland hardwood dry, i.e. that these are uplands not within its Clean Water Act

Oral argument — Nidal Nasrallah v. U.S. Attorney General

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

I think you have to take her comments in context, Your Honor. This was the very first time... … Well, I think the standard of review for a particularly serious crime is one that is somewhat up in the air in the circuits at the moment. If I may address that.

Oral argument — Specialized Bicycle Components v. K.G. Motors, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2016

They had 43% compound growth over the period that we're looking at. … And we have the fact that NoTubes had 37, sometimes as much as 45 times greater sales in the same period.

Oral argument — Transwestern Pipeline Company v. 46.78 acres of permanent easem

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2012

Now, maybe you can respond, but he was there as a young man and only for a brief period and so on. … He didn't just pull it out of thin air. Our opening brief at page 42 talks about Mr.

Oral argument — Nilesh Patel v. James Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2020

This includes claims for confinement in unventilated and inadequately cooled spaces for an extended period of time. Here, Mr. … And I gathered the evidence is the air still wasn't getting back to him.

Oral argument — United States v. Daniela Gozes-Wagner

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 29, 2020

You cannot just isolate comments and that's what the court in Niva held. You can't just isolate one or two comments in Niva. It was a different context because there they are. … Council says plain air review on that. Do you acknowledge that that is plain air? Oh, that was absolutely preserved.

Oral argument — People v. Murdock

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2012

He hadn't sit in a room an interrogation room alone for four hours to contemplate his predicament he During that four-hour period detective machines. … on that Whether or not The testimony of course being that he explicitly made that promise Whether or not detective Mishinsky said something to him that he interpreted as that is You know is Up in the air

Oral argument — Lamberty v. Connecticut State Police Union

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2020

And the Civil Rights Attorneys Fees Act of 1976 promotes that. … Public acts are. Ms. Kendall cites COVID as the reason the state legislature in Connecticut hasn't acted.

Oral argument — Unsuck DC Metro v. WMATA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2021

, which involves subjecting those forms to, you know, a form of notice and comment. … What if the question is, on a scale of one to 10, how clean is the Metro? How does that provide any information whatsoever to decision makers?

Oral argument — A. J. T. v. Osseo Area Schools

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2025

Because the way they define deliberate indifference sounds a lot like someone acting in bad faith. Your Honor, can I just add one additional comment on your earlier question and then answer that one? … So if you're going to rule against us, at least wipe the slate clean and say, they want to say you have to follow Title VI because they don't make difference in terms of parties and you have to use intent

Oral argument — United States v. Susan Tomsha-Miguel

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2014

So this Court is looking at it from a plein air perspective. The most likely reason he didn't object in real time is because the comments, when read in context, are completely appropriate and proper. … under a plein air standard.

Oral argument — Bradley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2010

Approximately 50 independent contractors have performed these installations in Illinois during the class period. … I'm just pulling a number out of the air, Your Honor.

Oral argument — United States v. Heon Seok Lee

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2019

Counsel, before I let this go, I just wanted to make a comment about your combined response reply brief. You used almost that entire brief as a reply. … So the restrictions of Section 16.05 of the Recovery Act do not apply to Korean goods. Period. End of analysis. He fully complied with Section 16.05. There was no fraudulent scheme, no crime.