Documents

Oral argument — Susan Dorety v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 15, 2023

Why is that the wrongful act? … The five to six day statistic, that refers either to the median incubation period or the average incubation period. And Dr.

Oral argument — In re: GREENFIELD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2022

ex-husband and one is my daughter who had a substantial amount of money into my property that they should have been awarded and for the Wormlingers to receive a full amount that they pulled out of the air … Hallin go ahead please thank you may it please the court again to follow up to miss Greenfield's comments to the court it is her burden as the appellant to for the due to the lack of her recent argument

Oral argument — Tyjuan Anderson v. City of Rockford, Illinois

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2019

Granted, it was a short period of time which was pointed out by the trial court. … Just point that out to clean up the record on that. With respect to Palmer, there's a lot of talk about what he knew.

Oral argument — Mark Gyves v. City of Houston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2019

Why not just argue – I don't have any more comments about that, but it's unusual. Why not just focus on whether there's a constitutional violation? … And let me address just the comment from opposing counsel on the fact that the sanction appears as a lifetime ban.

Oral argument — United States v. Shahid Muslim

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 20, 2019

And when we're on the fourth prong of plain air review, a strong and compelling showing of violent conduct overcomes any claim of plain air. That's the thing. … You've heard some of the comments from the Court. Do you have anything to add? I do, a couple of things.

Oral argument — State of New Hampshire v. 3M Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2023

That needs to, and it can be for or it can be relating to, to the acts allegedly undertaken at behest of a federal officer, and that's not the case here. … I understood that Judge McCafferty was saying that there's a period during which you may move to see if you wish, but I did not have the sense that we were guaranteed a stay.

Oral argument — Warbelow's Air v. CIR

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 14, 2003

We're dealing with airport property, air reservation property, 43 U.S.C. … I believe that another part of the air navigation strip is also owned by the federal government.

Oral argument — Farmers Tx Cty Mtl v. 1st Choice

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2025

Is it correct that your client did not amend for a period of six months after saying it would amend? That's correct, Your Honor. … And the other case I would cite the court to on this initial argument that the district court hasn't actually aired is the Disney case, which actually was cited by Farmers.

Oral argument — County of San Mateo v. Chevron Corp.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2020

ever enters into a contract for a limited duration for a small amount, does that entitle federal jurisdiction, even though in the grand scheme of things it's very, very tiny and for a short, limited period … A very brief comment about the scope of review. As Judge Ikuda pointed out, the Yamaha case analyzed a different statute, 1292B, with very different policy concerns.

Oral argument — United States v. Ikeviaun Johnson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2024

And your honor, the plein air conceded by the government is the first two elements of plein air relief. That there was air and it was plein and Mr. … But I want to circle back just briefly to Judge Nemar's comment about the jury instructions and highlight one thing.

Oral argument — Natalie Qandah v. Johor Corporation

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 12, 2019

There's case law under the Global Tech case, the Sixth Circuit case that we've cited, that it can be air for a district court judge not to resolve facts. And this is an important distinction. … Your Honor, thank you for the opportunity to refute some of the comments. And I know my time is limited here, so I'm going to try to go through as quickly as possible.

Oral argument — Hutson v. Village of Ridge Farm

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2015

Well, that's covered by the Tort Immunity Act. There is no justifiable reason for recognizing the public duty rule anymore. So I appreciate your comment. I don't think it applies here. … Under the Tort Immunity Act, this doesn't fit in any particular section of the Tort Immunity Act, barring it.

Oral argument — Kenneth Marsh v. County of San Diego

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 4, 2010

The comment was made by David Chadwick. And it says three to four story, third to four story fall. … In that six-month period, this little boy suffered multiple injuries, including two fractured hands, that were never treated. Nobody ever took him to the hospital.

Oral argument — Nidal Nasrallah v. U.S. Attorney General

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2018

I think you have to take her comments in context, Your Honor. This was the very first time... … Well, I think the standard of review for a particularly serious crime is one that is somewhat up in the air in the circuits at the moment. If I may address that.

Oral argument — Trustees of the Southern Calif v. Rick Middleton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2010

I don't really see you in clean hands here, and latches is, you know, kind of relates to the same thing. I mean, we only have latches if you know of your rights and rest on them. … During that entire 14-year period, they were doing exactly what they were supposed to be doing.

Oral argument — Old Ben Coal Company v. OWCP

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2023

State law largely provides that corporations' existence can continue to wind up debts for a five-year period. … The judge below confused the preamble with the regulations, which themselves were subject to notice and comment rulemaking.

Oral argument — Nilesh Patel v. James Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2020

This includes claims for confinement in unventilated and inadequately cooled spaces for an extended period of time. Here, Mr. … And I gathered the evidence is the air still wasn't getting back to him.

Oral argument — Smith v. Olvera

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2026

But first, I want to begin by making a comment. … This is a short time period. We're talking about less than a minute or something when he was all by himself with Mr. Smith.

Oral argument — People v. Murdock

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2012

He hadn't sit in a room an interrogation room alone for four hours to contemplate his predicament he During that four-hour period detective machines. … on that Whether or not The testimony of course being that he explicitly made that promise Whether or not detective Mishinsky said something to him that he interpreted as that is You know is Up in the air

Oral argument — Sullivan v. etectRx, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2023

So, Your Honor, I think this period refers to the period of time in which E-Tech RX was going to be exploring all options. … That's the ambit of the Wage Act.