Documents

Oral argument — Baxter Vinson v. Alan Walls

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2014

They cannot fail to act in a situation where they know of a life-threatening medical condition. … Here we have an almost identical time period that elapsed.

Oral argument — Frankie Nelson v. County of Cook

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 26, 2025

The Equal Pay Act claim is not before us. That was dismissed earlier in the case and that is not before this court. Okay, here, help me out on this. … And, quite frankly, between 2002 and 2005, which is the alleged period of time, Henry White was paid less. He was paid less than the plaintiff.

Oral argument — United States v. Jorge Gomez-Gomez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2019

That's a comment. It's a representation. What the judge didn't do is determine what the facts were. … So the issue about San Francisco was fully aired at the hearing. The defense counsel was fully on notice about that.

Oral argument — United States v. Renee Pratt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2015

He did so over a period of three years in which he directly commented on the three cases in issue prior to and during their trials. … Fowler cited in his brief, in a string site, we pointed those out, in all of those, there was a balancing act that took place.

Oral argument — Pyramid Lake Paiute v. Board of Directors

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2009

The Settlement Act was in 1990. Yes. The complaint was filed. There were apparently settlement discussions or something about the Settlement Act. Right. … There's got to be a logical or some kind of analogous basis to do so. 1961 is as good as any as opposed to pulling something out of thin air.

Oral argument — Syntex USA v. Apotex

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 5, 2007

Period. I don't even know why they need the injunction. That is correct. As Ms. … Certainly it's not contemplated by the Hans Waxman Act, so I would say no. Well, why isn't it? Because the Hans Waxman Act does leave in place the prospect of injunction. Well, because...

Oral argument — Rose Johansen v. American General Life Ins. Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 7, 2014

Do you want to continue with your comments and look that up during? Well, yes. I want to. I really. … And the final comment If you have an answer to Judge Hawkins I do.

Oral argument — Parker v. Donovan

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 1, 2010

That it goes beyond just the jury or the fact finder calling into question the credibility based upon a prior act as opposed to talking about a characterization of someone in the present. … And I think that he's in a very good position to make a determination as to whether or not comments are inflammatory, or whether or not they rise to the level of plain air.

Oral argument — United States v. Smith

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2007

Smith, if you look at his history, his history showed periods of long employment, and during those periods of time, Mr. Smith was addicted. … Well, I think the answer from the government standpoint, and I think one that the court may have considered was is clean up your act, Mr.

Oral argument — People v. Murry

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 21, 2024

And here, the defendant cannot show he suffered prejudice under the first prong of the plein air doctrine. The evidence here was not closely balanced. … And if you cannot maintain decorum and not act out, because, again, that would be improper in front of a jury, then that is what the warning is for.

Oral argument — People v. Thompson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2018

Thompson knows he's asking his court for extraordinary relief under the Plain Air Doctrine. … They can also comment that his case is uncontradicted. Counsel, what about this propensity evidence? You know, I guess the state's attorney commenting on the defendant being a murderer.

Oral argument — Brian Towne v. Karen Donnelly

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 16, 2022

If it was within two years of the initial retaliatory act, then yes, he would be able to bring a federal First Amendment claim. … I could conceive of a scenario just like what you're describing, your honor, where a prosecution is brought based on some political endeavor and vendetta, but the evidence is completely clean.

Oral argument — United States v. Ramon Hueso

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2011

Now, the Alaska transactions only occurred over a January-February time period in 2008, and Mr. Hueso acted as a seller to TW. … So in one transaction, he was going to have his debt with her wiped clean. So his stake in that transaction was huge. Another factor in Rivera is trust.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Lozano , Sr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

But air traffic is the only way in or out. In this case, there were no working dogs. This is Barrow, right up on the slope? That's correct, Your Honor. … U.S., if the jury can reasonably conclude that the act occurred and the defendant was the actor, then the evidence is admissible.

Oral argument — People v. Vazquez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2016

I know, but again, that's now wiped clean. The conviction is vacated. The sentence is vacated. He goes back to court. He's not convicted. … After the comment that you read in the record or from the record, is there anything that says and about the relationship between the parties?

Oral argument — Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014

The question is the district court didn't decide that, whether he had this hypothetical comment afterwards of what he would do. Correct. … But there's a time period on that. Your Honor, as we understand that – When it first becomes removable.

Oral argument — Grand Trunk Corporation v. TSA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025

So the comment period will close, but there's no way of knowing when, if at all, the agency will act, right, after the comment period closes? Yeah, that's exactly right. … And they had to act really quickly, within an hour. There was no time for notice and comment, for cost-benefit analysis, or writing kind of a long write-up of the reasons.

Oral argument — Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2026

That's because the bulk solution itself is not clean. You can use whatever you want, high temperature, low temperature. … At some period, you freeze-dried it, and you get a powder. Later, you have the little powder in a vial. You add some kind of...

Oral argument — Programmers Guildv.Homeland Secruity

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2009

All these have addressed the Immigration and Nationality Act and have held that this type of injury is within the zone of interest of that Act. … DHS was given the authority to determine time periods that aliens would stay.

Oral argument — Raquel Camps v. Roberto Bravo, Appellant/Cross

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 14, 2025

You're not tolling all that period because there was no statute in place at the time. Well, there were limitations hadn't expired. Well, there was an alien Tort Claims Act. … They argued up until the time period, basically 2010. This was a whole new issue.