Documents

Oral argument — Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2014

The question is the district court didn't decide that, whether he had this hypothetical comment afterwards of what he would do. Correct. … But there's a time period on that. Your Honor, as we understand that – When it first becomes removable.

Oral argument — Emerald Performance Materials v. The Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 24, 2021

Tapp did, where he went inside and took surface samples and air samples and reviewed documentation from a plant. He stalked the plant from 50 yards away. … The statute of limitations in the Occupational Diseases Act is three years from the date of disablement.

Oral argument — United States v. Neal Harris

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 22, 2025

services one set up the video equipment so that he could stream his services throughout the pandemic like many churches did and another one testified that he was responsible for the maintenance and for cleaning … them they needed to do these things that the court relied upon and applying the sophisticated means enhancement so it's our position that even certainly under de novo standard but even under a clear air

Oral argument — United States v. Seeley

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 12, 2021

You know, I'm going to interrupt for a minute here, because if these are not cited in your brief, this counselor hasn't had a chance to respond and comment on them. … And because, again, there's no plein air here, I think also because there's no harm to Mr.

Oral argument — Carole Rucker v. Mary Lattimore

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 10, 2010

comments. … So, trial judge makes those comments and says, okay, well, bring him on to testify if you want, and he naturally gets an attorney and doesn't testify, but why not air this at a hearing?

Oral argument — Goodrich Corporation v. USDOD

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2009

Furthermore, the administrative record is open to comment by the parties, by parties not just including Goodrich, by other parties as well. … EPA would then say, well, you haven't cleaned up the site yet.

Oral argument — Victoria Thomas v. National Education Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2014

The judge makes a comment, actually, in the course of it, saying, I said you could come back, and I guess that's what we're doing now. You know, he says that at page 13. Yes. … I mean, there are these big delays, and there's this long period of time.

Oral argument — Gundy v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 2, 2018

This is not a question of how much air particle at what cost can be taken from the environment. … Do periodic show-ups. And there's no dispute, I think, that the state registries at the time SORNA was passed were not equipped to do all of that.

Oral argument — People v. Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 13, 2023

Darnick have during this three-day period to obtain drugs? You mentioned you think the wife might've delivered. … Especially, and I will tell you that, especially given the court's comments weren't indicated that, you know, had it been a bench trial, it likely would have been a different result. I felt that Mr.

Oral argument — Bradley v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 1, 2010

Approximately 50 independent contractors have performed these installations in Illinois during the class period. … I'm just pulling a number out of the air, Your Honor.

Oral argument — Tino Pese v. D. Runnels

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 4, 2013

It's just not a clean analysis. But I have to take it for what it is. I agree. I agree. … I want to comment about the pattern of — of — of preemptory challenges here. You take your prospective jurors as you find them.

Oral argument — National Labor Relations Board v. Airgas USA, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

But there's no way to back engineer the data on the record in the air gas case to show what criteria Scott McFarland used in those several years before 2018. … That's a straightforward act of retaliation that violated the National Labor Relations Act.

Oral argument — United States v. Robert Lozano , Sr.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2010

But air traffic is the only way in or out. In this case, there were no working dogs. This is Barrow, right up on the slope? That's correct, Your Honor. … U.S., if the jury can reasonably conclude that the act occurred and the defendant was the actor, then the evidence is admissible.

Oral argument — Benjamin H. Realty Corp. v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2017

In a situation where you have the issue really isn't supervisor or not riding on a clean slate. It's whether he continued as a supervisor after Mr. Weiss was hired. … He was a supervisor for 12 years and the question is whether it continued through that 4-month period.

Oral argument — Estate of George Worrell Jr v. Thang Inc

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2026

And that would be at a minimum based on the 76 to 79 period, even if we don't agree with you about things recorded after 79. … Just your comment makes me wonder, who drafted the 76 agreement? I don't know, Your Honor. The record isn't clear on that. Was it your side or was it Worrell who drafted it?

Oral argument — Melo v. City of Somerville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 7, 2020

So that's the date of the discriminatory act? That is, the date of termination is the date of at least one discriminatory act, the last discriminatory act. … And, yes, I say that the act, you know, the final act, there may be other acts that he could have filed for. But the final act is the city has terminated him. The city terminates him.

Oral argument — United States v. Davis

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2008

Well, as I understand it, the basis for the probable cause for the warrant was the anonymous tip, I guess two anonymous tips, to the Narcotics Task Force over a period of several months. … I was reacting only to her initial comments about the curtilage question. Okay. We're back to curtilage. I'm sorry.

Oral argument — United States v. Paul Williams

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 8, 2014

So your argument is, is the part of the acts, that there were no acts that occurred within the statute of limitations period? Is that your point? Well, I'll say this. I don't know. … If it's forfeiture and air, we review it. If it's waived and air, we don't review it. Because it's an affirmative defense, I believe it may be forfeited. And I'm looking ---- It may be waived.

Oral argument — People v. Terrell

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 17, 2025

Here, the search warrant searched for evidence of the offense of aggravated battery with a firearm in a limited time period. The cell phone records held by T-Mobile. … The officers acted in good faith and objectively reasonable reliance on the search warrant issued by the neutral and detached magistrate.

Oral argument — Teresa Barry v. James O'Grady

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 30, 2017

Frank's comments were graphic, were explicit as to some of this sexual activity that the In the course of this laughter, Judge O'Grady made the comment, she must be good at what she does. … And that's where Your Honors have to address, as the court did, that this is a constellation of ongoing acts. The comments about women's attire.