Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

Filters2007

10,000+ results

0.41s

  • Petition — Wise v. California

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

    Wainwright (5th Cir. 1968) 399 F.2d 62; Wong Sun v. United States (1963) 371 U.S. 471; Badillo v. … Bower, supra, 24 Cal.3d 638; People v. Menifee (1979) 100 Cal.App. 3d 235-) 12.

    449 U.S. 844
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sayda Powery Orellana and Manuel Porras Salas, Petitioners v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 12, 2021

    Rosa, 399 F.3d at 291, distinction or line to be drawn. 4. … App’x 395, 399 (9th Cir. 2019) (finding waiver based on Cain).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Phillips Pipe Line Co. v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1942

    United States, 24 Fed. Se a eas og Acie Sag aaah fen apes 24 Hale v. State Board of Assessment and Review, 302 MRT oo nee ee eh 10, 20 Helvering v. … His testimony was in terms of what the phrase means ‘‘to me’’ (R. 398-399, 413-414, 431).

    316 U.S. 679
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benasa Realty Co. v. Mooney

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1993

    Co., 815 F.2d 254, 266 (3rd Cir. 1987) 23, 24 Mesarosh v. United States, ome Gels By BS CEPSOF «6 « te te te te 12 Offensend v. … Atlantic Refining Co., 322 Pa. 399, 185 A. 745 (1936) ... 39 Pavorsky, 148 A.2d at 103 ...... 39 Restatement (Second) of Torts SSJamials © © © 8 6 & © ee eel et lll hl SE Roe v.

    507 U.S. 915
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of Health and Human Services, et al., Petitioners v. Braidwood Management, Inc., et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 25, 2025

    No. 24-316 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States __________ ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR., SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL., Petitioners, v. … Res. 399 (June 2020). 14 care coverage has even helped cancer survivors obtain necessary care.37 II.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — MSN Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 8, 2025

    Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399 (2012) .................... 16 Chiron Corp. v. Genentech, Inc., 363 F.3d 1247 (Fed. … Novo Nordisk A/S, 566 U.S. 399, 405-07 (2012).

  • Asylum Law and Female Genital Mutilation: Recent Developments

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 15, 2008

    Gonzales, 445 F.3d 741, 745 (4th Cir. 2006). 16 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N. … . § 208.13(b)(1). 37 In re A-T-, 24 I. & N.

    RS22810Congressional Research Service
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Ernesto Salgado Martinez, Petitioner v. David Shinn, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections, Rehabilitation and Reentry, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 28, 2022

    Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 978 (9th Cir. 2005) (same). … Jackson, 513 F.3d at 1076; Hayes, 399 F.3d at 978.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Sarah R. Lee, Petitioner v. Ohio Education Association, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Sep 28, 2020

    Judgment entered February 24, 2020. … Gabica that categorically rejects this idea.24 In Clement 20. Pinsky v.

  • FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

    Federal Register · Uncategorized Document · Oct 11, 1994

    RP94-401-000, RP94-399-000, 001 and 002, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America CAG-9. Docket No. RP85-202-014, Trunkline Gas Company CAG-10. Docket Nos. … Omitted CAG-24. Omitted CAG-25. Docket No. GP90-7-000, Barbara T. Fasken CAG-26. Docket Nos. CP94-114-001 and CP94-694-001, Distrigas of Massachusetts CAG-27. Omitted CAG-28.

  • Opposition — Gibson v. Davis

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979

    reinstated because the notice of proposed removal had been insufficiently specific and had not included one of the reasons cited in the final Bureau decision ordering that petitioner be discharged (App. 18-24 … Testan; 424 U.S. 392, 399 (1976); United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584 (1941).

    441 U.S. 905
  • Opposition — Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div. v. Craft

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978

    City of Eureka, 399 F. Supp. 64, 67-68 (D.Kan. 1975); Limuvel v. Southern Union Gas Co., 378 F. Supp. 964, 966-67 (W.D.Tex. 1974); Bronson v. … City of Chattanooga, 192 Tenn. 267, 241 S.W.24 291 (1951), and Jones v.

    436 U.S. 1
  • Opposition Brief — Naim v. Naim

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1955

    (See Opinion below, Statement as to Jurisdiction, Page 24.) ca 4 trary or without a reasonable relation to the purpose of the statute. … Meyer y, Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399. The appellee’s reasoning pre- supposes the validity of the purpose of the statute. Oyama v. California, 332 U. S. 633, 646.

    350 U.S. 891
  • Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Pfeifer v. Bell & Howell Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1974

    (m September 24. 19TS. Pfeifer filed a notice of appeal of the District Judge's Getober 29, 1973 order [sice!] with the Tta Cireuit Court of Appeals (page following 399, Petition).

    416 U.S. 973
  • Opposition Brief for the United States — Webster v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief for the United States · 1971

    most of these cars, inserting prices in the applications and bills of sale based on the retail value, although the actual ‘prices were often several thousand dollars below re- tail (Tr. 220-255, 399 … This is the limit established by Rule 24(b),, F.R.Crim.P., and the exercise of the court’s ° discretion in refusing to grant additional peremptory challenges was proper. United States v.

    404 U.S. 853
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Benzo Elias Rudnikas, Petitioner v. Florida, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 9, 2026

    Nov. 24, 2025) (“In our adversarial system of adjudication, we follow the principle of party presentation.” United States v. Sineneng-Smith, 590 U.S. 371, 375, 140 S.Ct. 1575, 206 L.Ed.2d 866 (2020). … United States, 554 U.S. 237, 243, 128 S.Ct. 2559, 171 L.Ed.2d 399 (2008)). To put it plainly, courts “call balls and strikes”; they don't get a turn at bat. Lomax v. Ortiz-Marquez, 590 U.

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — In re Bisbee

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1998

    Alabama, 399 U.S. 1 (1970) .... 14, 17, 23, 25 Coopers and Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 463 (1978) ..... 24 Corfield v. Coryell, 4 Wash., C.C. 371 (1823).......... 15 Faretta v. … App. 24-25a, infra. The decision below conflicts with the foregoing pre- cedents.

    523 U.S. 1121
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Lander v. Alabama

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1990

    App. 521, 323 So.2d 406, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 399, 323 So.2d 411 (1975); German wv. State, 429 $0.2d 1138 (Ala.Cr. App. 1983). … App. 521, 323 So0.2d 406, cert. denied, 295 Ala. 399, 323 So.2d 411 (1975); German , State, 429 So.2d 1138 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983).

    494 U.S. 1030
  • The Work Opportunity Tax Credit (WOTC)

    Congressional research report · CRS Report · Feb 4, 2013

    For eligible hires (except eligible veterans entitled to compensation for a serviceconnected disability and summer youth) who remain employed from 120 hours to 399 hours, the subsidy rate is 25%. … The 25% subsidy rate for WOTC group members employed from 120 to 399 hours was applied to long-term family assistance recipients, and the WtW credit’s 35% rate for those employed at least 400 hours during

    RL30089Congressional Research Service
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — MRI Associates of Tampa, Inc., Petitioner v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Mar 7, 2022

    Green, 399 U.S. 149 (1970) ....................22 Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla. 1978) ..................27 Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) ..............24 Chamberlain v. … Green, 399 U.S. 149, 187, n. 20 (1970) (Justice Harlan, concurring) (due process does not permit a conviction based on no evidence); Gregory v.

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.