Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.14s
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Act (“CAA”) and Clean Water Act. … See also CAA § 302(h), reprinted in A Legislative History of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, 93d Cong., 2d Sess. (Comm. Print 1974).
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
States as recognized by the Clean Air Act (CAA). … Only after the close of the comment period did EPA express its disagreement with ADEC’s BACT determination ordering ADEC to require the use of SCR on the new generator.
540 U.S. 461Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
Only after the close of the comment period did EPA express its disagreement with ADEC’s BACT determination. 4 EPA ordered ADEC to require the use of SCR on the new generator. … According to Wiens and Hefner, “The Environmental Protection Agency’s . . . oversight role [under the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act] has been clashing
540 U.S. 461Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
Scoping Document and Proposed Statewide Policy on Clean Water Act 316(b) Regulations (Sept. 25, 2006), available at http://www. … Code, § 38500, et seq.) and the state’s efforts to ccuiphy with ambient air quality standards for criteria pollutants as mandated by the federal Clean Air Act and the California Clean Air Act.°® Faced
Amicus Curiae Brief — Kentucky, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026
In this case, the Final Rule lost sight of the Clean Air Act. … EPA has taken the Clean Air Act to a place where failure is the inevitable result.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Washington v. General Motors Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1971
History of the Air Quality Act of 1967, 1967 U.S. … II, Project Clean Air (1970) (here- after Project Clean Air). 21Epstein, Potential Carcinogenicity, Mutagenicity, and Terato- genicity Due to Community Air Pollutants, Project Clean Air, Appendix M
404 U.S. 811Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
This Court’s interpretation of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in these cases could signifi- cantly affect most, if not all, of the 38 U.S. nuclear power plants that do not currently use … In addition to possible adverse effects on the land and air surrounding plants, retrofitting could adversely affect the very water resources protected by the Clean Water Act.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Massachusetts v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Cir. 1981)... . 22, 25 Vv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (cont'd) Page Statutes Clean Air Act, sections 108 and 109, 42 U.S.C. 7408-7409 .. 3 Clean Air Act, section 202(a)(1), 42 U.S.C. § 7521(a)(1) (2000 … ) ...............4... passim Clean Air Act, section 302, 42 U.S.C. 7602 .............. 3 Clean Air Act, section 302(g), 42 U.S.C. 7602 ............ 3 Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Title V, PCRs
549 U.S. 497Amicus Curiae Brief — Hallstrom v. Tillamook County
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1989
The citizen suit provision in the Clean Air Act Amend- ments recognized the need for citizen participation in the enforcement of the Clean Air Act both to help achieve the Act’s goals and to augment … This version of the notice provision was enacted into law as part of the Clean Air Act Amendments. C.
489 U.S. 1077Amicus Curiae Brief — Natural Resources Defense Council, Petitioner v. Mexichem Fluor, Inc., et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2018
Times, Dec. 9, 2013, 3 In order to carry out U.S. obligations under the Montreal Protocol, Congress adopted Title VI of the Clean Air Act in 1990. … OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990, at 1428 (1993).
Amicus Curiae Brief — West Virginia, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 25, 2022
Air Act, and the major questions doctrine. … shifting, in prior Clean Air Act regulation. 3 Professor Revesz has also documented Congress’s concerns for climate change in enacting the Clean Air Act in 1970.4 1.
Amicus Curiae Brief — General Motors Corp. v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990
Air Act. … It must be emphasized that SIPs implementing the Clean Air Act are not static.
496 U.S. 530Amicus Curiae Brief — Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998
Ed. 987 Ubi uthatehidebetsbubes40aeescccenceuece Page iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES - Continued Page STATUTES Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, 42 U.S.C. … It could, and did, insert explicit permission for suits for some past violations in the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990.
523 U.S. 83Amicus Curiae Brief — Appalachian Power Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1974
Hereinafter the “Clean Air Act of 1970” will be referred to as merely the “Clean Air Act”. 5. 40 C.F.R. $60.43 (1973). 6. … the time schedules contemplated by Section 110 or 111 of the Clean Air Act.'
416 U.S. 969Amicus Curiae Brief — Oklahoma, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024
Air Act. … administration of the Clean Air Act.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jul 26, 2018
Times, Dec. 9, 2013, 3 In order to carry out U.S. obligations under the Montreal Protocol, Congress adopted Title VI of the Clean Air Act in 1990. … OF THE CLEAN AIR ACT AMENDMENTS OF 1990, at 1428 (1993).
Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Under the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), the member agencies of STAPPA and ALAPCO have the task of developing and implementing air pollution control strategies that will protect public health and the environment … As a result, challenges to EPA regulations adopted under the Clean Air Act have been resolved expeditiously and with finality.
549 U.S. 561Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 23, 2026
In this case, the Final Rule lost sight of the Clean Air Act. … EPA has taken the Clean Air Act to a place where failure is the inevitable result.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2009
This Court’s interpretation of Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) in these cases could signifi- cantly affect most, if not all, of the 38 U.S. nuclear power plants that do not currently use … In addition to possible adverse effects on the land and air surrounding plants, retrofitting could adversely affect the very water resources protected by the Clean Water Act.
556 U.S. 208Amicus Curiae Brief — Department of Education, et al., Petitioners v. Myra Brown, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 3, 2023
Block, 755 F.2d 1098 (4th Cir. 1985) ...................................................8 Clean Air Council v. Pruitt, 862 F.3d 1 (D.C. … Because of this, any alterations to the current rules must again comply with the APA’s notice-and-comment process. Clean Air Council v. Pruitt, 862 F.3d 1, 9 (D.C. Cir. 2017).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.