Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.75s
Opposition — United States Steel Corporation v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
I) POOREID orca 5, 9, 10 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970. Pub. L. No. 91-604. 84 Stat. 1676.0... 2 Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. Pub. L. … STATEMENT In the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 (Pub. L.
444 U.S. 1035Appendix — Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1975
Air Act (Act). … Air Act (Act).
421 U.S. 60Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
Air Act. … Reich in 1981 was the top civil servant for stationary source enforcement under the Clean Air Act.
549 U.S. 561Amicus Curiae Brief — Train v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1975
Air Quality Act of 1967, Pub. L. 90-145, 42 U.S.C. S185%, Clean Air Act Amendments of 1966, Pub. LL. 89-675, 42 UOS.C. $ 1897; Clean Air of 1963, Pub. … Nov. 11. 1974): see also, Comment, Variance Proecdures Under the Clean Air Act: The Necd for Fleribility, 15 Wa. & M. L. Rev. 324 (1973).
421 U.S. 60Appendix — Environmental Protection Agency v. Brown
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1977
Under the Clean Air Act the standards must be met by 1977 at the latest. … with the ob- jectives of the Clean Air Act.
431 U.S. 99Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1976
as part of the Clean Air Act of 1963." … While these comments Hearings on Implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 before the Subcomm. on Air and Water Pollution of the Senate Comm. on Public Works, 92d Cong. 2d Sess. 275 (1972
Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Defense v. Duke Energy Corporation
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007
The Clean Air Act’s Deliberate Scheme. … language of the Clean Air Act.”
549 U.S. 561Joint Appendix — Chevron USA Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Joint Appendix · 1984
and Section 129 of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977. … Clean Air Act.
467 U.S. 837Appendix — Dow Chemical Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1981
(k) and (m) of the Clean Air Act. 2. … by adding Section 123 of the Clean Air Act.
452 U.S. 939Opposition Brief — Ohio, et al., Petitioners v. Environmental Protection Agency, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Dec 10, 2024
Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006) ............................. 5 Laws Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. … Compare Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-604, § 12(a), 84 Stat. 1676, 1707-08 (§ 307(c)), with Clean Air Act Amendments of 1977, Pub. L. No. 95-95, § 305, 91 Stat. 685, 772-76.
Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska Dept. of Environmental Conservation v. EPA
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004
NEDA/CARP was formed in 1979, shortly after enactment of the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments that codified PSD permitting requirements, to address Clean Air Act regulations and Environmental Protection … These member companies operate hundreds of manufacturing facilities covered by Clean Air Act permits and other requirements.
540 U.S. 461Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Supreme Court brief · Response to application from Power Company Respondents · Aug 19, 2024
Pallone noting “[t]hese ‘existing authorities’ include [Clean Air Act] Section 111”). … It provided an extended 75-day comment period as well as a supplemental comment period. 88 Fed.
Appendix — West Virginia ex rel. Air Pollution Control Commission v. Gorsuch
Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1982
Section 110(a) (2) (A) of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations require that a compliance schedule provide for attainment of the secondary standard within a reasonable period of time. … Section 110(a) (2) (A) of the Clean Air Act and EPA regulations require that a compliance schedule pro- vide for attainment of a secondary NAAQS within a reason- able period of time.
456 U.S. 972Petition — Big Rivers Electric Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976
Whether the Clean Air Act authorizes the Admin- istrator of the U. … STATUTORY PROVISIONS INVOLVED The Clean Air Act amendments of 1970, 42 U.S.C. §1857a-j (the “Clean Air Act’’).
425 U.S. 934Supreme Court brief · Emergency Application · Aug 20, 2024
Clean Air Act Section 112’s Statutory Framework........................................ 5 B. Michigan v. … Clean Air Act Section 112’s Statutory Framework 1.
Petitioners Brief — Mont. Power Co. v. U.S.E.P.A.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1977
The Clean Air Act. For the most part, the relevant provisions of the Clean Air Act were enacted by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1970 (84 Stat. 1676), as summarized below. … by the Clean Air Act.
430 U.S. 953Amicus Curiae Brief — Environmental Protection Agency v. Coalition for Clean Air
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1993
COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, et al. … (COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR, et al.
507 U.S. 950Respondents Brief — Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 2001
Establishing and Revising the NAAQS The Clean Air Act requires the Administrator of EPA to establish and periodically revise NAAQS for a limited subset of air pollutants. … The Clean Air Act also contains “The Clean Air Act's program addressing toxic air pollutants, for example, covers approximately 180 different pollutants.
531 U.S. 457Record and brief — Am. Chemistry Council v. Envtl. Prot. Agency
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 2013
See also sections 161, 162, and 167 of the Clean Air Act. … The Clean Air Act clearly calls for a detailed and extensive air quality impact assessment.
571 U.S. 951
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.