Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

discretionary federal agency action subject to ESA Section 7 “consultation,” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a\(2), the nexus between federal agency actions and private land use is exceedingly broad, and includes Clean … ) (“Any effective program for the conservation of endangered species demands that there be mer ge abe ne gene agen te mee ae habitat which i itical to th ival_ of 3 ag” (emphasis added). 14 any air

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bentkey Services, LLC, dba The Daily Wire, Applicant v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Scott Bedke, in His Official Capacity as Speaker of the Idaho House of Representatives, et al. et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Republican National Committee, Applicant v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Word of God Fellowship, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BST Holdings, LLC, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Job Creators Network, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Estados Unidos Mexicanos

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 3, 2024

McBride, 564 U.S. 685, 706-07 (2011) (Roberts, C.J., dissenting) (cleaned up). … (citations omitted) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Board of Education v. National Gay Task Force

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1984

The Baggett Court's comments are equally applicabl. here. … Furthermore, the Oklahoma law was “written upon a clean slate,” and it “appear[s] as a clean slate now,” id. at 160, without any limiting or clarifying construction.

Amicus Curiae Brief — West Lynn Creamery, Inc. v. Healy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1994

It is important to maintain a stable local milk supply in periods of excess milk supply in order to ensure adequate supplies during periods of shortages. ARGUMENT I. … See e.g., J.A. 59 (Comments of Mr.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tommy Sharp, Interim Warden, Petitioner v. Patrick Dwayne Murphy

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 26, 2018

This brief focuses on three critical periods in the Nation’s history – reservation creation, allotment, and statehood – and demonstrates how, for each period, treaty and statutory text defeat Petitioner … Nor would affirmance supplant State regulatory authority under the Clean Air Act or the Safe Drinking Water Act. OIPA Br. 27-28, 30-31; EFO Br. 2.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2000

Petitioners’ common law theory of liability would severely impair a safety program that the federal government developed with unprecedented thoroughness over a period of 30 years. … The agency has been “extremely concerned * * * about deaths caused by air bags,” 61 Fed.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Medical Marijuana, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Douglas J. Horn

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 4, 2024

Id. at 9a−10a (quoting Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary 302 (1971) (cleaned 9 up)). … Stone Tracy Co., 220 U.S. 107, 171 (1911) (cleaned up)). Judges generally agree.

Amicus Curiae Brief — TikTok Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 27, 2024

Int’l Union, Loc. 1000, 567 U.S. 298, 308–09 (2012) (cleaned up). As this Court has recognized, preserving this marketplace of ideas requires carefully cabining the government’s authority. … The Act, supra, § 2(g)(3)(B)(ii).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Continentalenental Carbon Co. v. Action Marine Marine, Inc. (No. 07-257)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2007

The pervasive confusion in the lower courts has not gone unnoticed by commentators. … ~ See Andrew Moskowitz, Comment. Meaning Is In The Eve of The Beholder: BMW v.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al., Applicants v. Illinois, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 21, 2025

of the United States, or the President is unable, with the other forces at his command, to execute the laws of the Union in any part thereof, it shall be lawful for the President to call forth, for a period … may be, except those applicable only to members of the Regular Army or Regular Air Force, as the case may be.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — Markwayne Mullin, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security, et al., Petitioners v. Dahlia Doe, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 13, 2026

Syrians trickle home from sanctuary at Russian air base, Reuters (Mar. 14, 2025), 58 Khalil Ashawi & Mahmoud Hasano, https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/syrians-tricklehome-sanctuary-russian-air-base … The events in Suwayda in July 2025 illustrate how even a single act of violence can lead to widespread armed conflict in today’s Syria.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Goldstein v. California

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

Although certain limited federal legislation became effective on February 15, 1972, there are liter- ally thousands of tapes and records which were pro- duced in the period of time prior to the enactment … The provisions of this Act shall not apply to any fees due ASCAP. Acts 1971, 62nd Leg., p. 2730, ch. 890, eff. Aug. 30, 1971.

Amicus Curiae Brief — McDade v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1995

GAO, Separate Army and Air Force and Air Force Airborne SINCGARS Programs May Be Uneco- nomical, GAO/NSIAD-85—50, January 31, 1985 .... … Throughout this developmental period, the Defense Ap- propriations Subcommittees maintained a continuing high level of bipartisan Congressional oversight over the SINCGARS program, because of its significance