Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

1.35s

  • Oral argument — United States v. Sterling Centrecorp Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 25, 2019

    It's not related to this particular decision to hook some homes up to a pipeline to provide clean public water. … So the mine was allowed to continue operating for some period of time after the order was issued, not until it's specifically applied to it is it canceled.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — United States v. Lance Stoddard

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009

    He didn't admit that I knew within this period of time that the guns were in there. … There were some matcher striker plates and then went on to say that the hazmat people had to come in to clean the mess up.

    18 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Lloyd

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012

    And finally, in his brief, as he cites the legislative history, this was a clean-up amendment. The legislature revamped the sexual assault statutes back in 1983, and this was a clean-up amendment. … And it was within a short period of time of having revamped the statutes, they did this to clean it up. And it may have been because they included a section about...

    49 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Lanahan Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Buenger

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2010

    Properly so, because the procedures of the Mechanics Lien Act was not followed. … My client, when he saw it, cleaned it up. Appropriately cleaned it up. It's not something that he caused. He's not somebody here that's trying to take advantage of someone.

    38 min of audio
  • Oral argument — etal USA v. Dukaetalpart1

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 24, 2011

    In plain air review on a variance, you have to show... Is it a variance? It's not, Your Honor. Why isn't it a variance? … A very different plain error standard applies to prosecutorial comments, and there's good reason for that.

    73 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jane Doe v. Compania Panamena de Aviacion

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 17, 2022

    Period. Period. Um, to kind of get back into that issue, there are two courts, um, cited in the brief one from the northern district of California and one out of, uh, Illinois. … And here, if an American procedural device like will 15 C can be used to extend that limitations period, um, it would have the limitations period.

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — O'Rourke v. Lake

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 27, 2014

    Requeno, he should have known that the foreseeable act was not that he was going to hurt or steal from Mrs. O'Rourke during that one-and-a-half-day period. Because he was going to be there. … And for whatever, he didn't just pick that house out of thin air.

    43 min of audio
  • Oral argument — People v. Thompson

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 7, 2018

    Thompson knows he's asking his court for extraordinary relief under the Plain Air Doctrine. … They can also comment that his case is uncontradicted. Counsel, what about this propensity evidence? You know, I guess the state's attorney commenting on the defendant being a murderer.

    58 min of audio
  • Oral argument — In re Wedgewood Properties - Jeff Moyer v. Connie Rogers

    Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2025

    in bad faith but you're all you're not acting in good faith but you're also not acting in good faith if you subjectively have knowledge of facts that would cause a reasonable person to say boy I think … periodic and and the cases seem to say that on the non-periodic garnishment it's all about actual notice basically whereas under the the separate I guess it's statute dealing with periodic notice it says

    60 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Planned Parenthood Great North v. Commissioner of the Indiana St

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025

    Well, if a person who receives that information acts on it, correct? That's what you want to punish. … A bit ago, you were about ready to make a comment on that. At the very beginning, if I recall correctly.

    36 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Hogan v. County of Lewis, New

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 26, 2019

    Denny heard himself referred to as a fresh air child. They called the police on his sister in the lake because she was … the report was polluting the lake. … were, that that particular act was clearly racial animus?

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Ninth Inning Inc. v. National Football League, Inc

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2026

    And so I think he acted well within his discretion in excluding Dr. Rasher, and I'm happy to talk about Dr. … I would say that's an abuse of discretion, and I would say he acted well within the abuse of discretion.

    39 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Evangeline Red v. Kraft Foods Inc.

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2017

    Safety Clean Systems? Yes. In that case, which I was a part of, we affirmed the district court's 50% negative multiplier to account for a limited success. … So whether you call it under a catalyst theory or he awarded them under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act or you awarded it under the private attorney general statute, he noted that they were a minor victor

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Edward M. Seamans v. Temple University

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 24, 2013

    Act, or the FCRA. … Furthermore, there are industry standards that corroborate that furniture may be fully aware of the importance of a clean date of first delinquency.

    33 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Reed v. Penasquitos Casablan

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 4, 2009

    But if you have a contractor who comes out every week to clean the pool, isn't he going to be subject to the Fair Housing Act if he's discriminating by throwing all the kids out of the pool when he gets … there to clean it?

    44 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Licon v. Marshall

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2008

    But having the jury hear about someone committing these acts over such a period is going to just turn a jury against a defendant, no matter what the facts of this case are. … There was great relevance because the, without the comment that appellant made, his actions were rather innocuous. So the comment using the F word was the most important evidence as to that count.

    31 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Aries Marine v. United Fire & Safety

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2025

    Although, the RAM-18 did act as crew quarters as well because it was an unmanned production platform. … If they kept, and it's true, they kept some equipment on the lift boat, and it was transferred over to the platform for work of the fluid clean people, not United Fire.

    40 min of audio
  • Oral argument — David Annor v. Merrick Garland

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 23, 2024

    IJ's must apply the law of the circuit that corresponds to the location of the immigration court where venue lay under the regulations now we would agree with the government if this court was writing a clean … 1956 a1b that's on pages 379 and 80 of the joint appendix though transactional money laundering under section 1957 a wasn't even alleged as an object of the conspiracy so what so the board indisputably aired

    32 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Jacqueline Agee v. Paige Hickenbottom

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 28, 2026

    In this case, we have concrete facts that the officers were acting in a way that suggested that they were acting not based on legitimate law enforcement reasons, but based on personal animus and class … My use of the word class in my opening argument had to do with the fact that the officers' derogatory comments were based on the plaintiffs' class, meaning their status, their position in society, their

    20 min of audio
  • Oral argument — Harry Barko v. Halliburton Company

    Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 6, 2020

    The dissent cleans it up a little bit. And then the other circuits are consistent with that. It's a pretty straightforward view in all the circuits. … This court presumes that Congress acts with knowledge of the legal landscape in which it's legislating.

    32 min of audio

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.