Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.21s
Oral argument — AEGIS Electric & Gas v. ECI Management LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2020
Their sole count is violation of the Georgia security deposit act, period. And that's that. The other reason why there's coverage under the statute itself is attorney's fees. … In this instance, when she moved out, they kept $60 of that money and were applying it for a cleaning.
30 min of audioOral argument — Mark Mayhew v. Town of Smyrna TN
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017
Well, he had three and a half years of college experience and a long period of time of service in the United States. Close, but no cigar. … So is he acting as an employee when he sends the email to town officials, or is he acting as a private citizen when he sends an email to town officials?
44 min of audioOral argument — Busher v. Barry Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2021
Your Honor, if that had been the first motion for summary judgment and we were on a clean slate, I think that argument – that might be a colorable argument. … When we got to our motion for summary judgment, we very clearly said that any share transactions that they're trying to act on post-2008 are not derivative claims. They're direct claims.
38 min of audioOral argument — MUSTANG v. CHEVRON
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 18, 2005
Hutchins in the Eleventh Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the First Circuit has commented on it. Baraka out of the Seventh Circuit has alluded to it indirectly. … The legislative history of the cases all talk about that being the most egregious violation of the Act.
33 min of audioOral argument — Baber Habib v. Loretta E. Lynch
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 11, 2015
But it seems to me, and I hadn't thought about this in quite this way before, but it seems to me you're asking us to credit conduct, kind of inequitable terms, for the fact that you remember the old clean … And in terms of this matter, then, the question presented is really about whether or not the Board acted within its discretion.
20 min of audioOral argument — Michael Assenberg v. Whitman County
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 29, 2018
Because my understanding is that he suffers from them periodically. I'm going to do this this way because the clock is ticking. Right. … In California, there's a Brown Act. And the Brown Act says there's going to be an opportunity for people to address that type of a body.
29 min of audioOral argument — Evangeline Red v. Kraft Foods Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 15, 2017
Safety Clean Systems? Yes. In that case, which I was a part of, we affirmed the district court's 50% negative multiplier to account for a limited success. … So whether you call it under a catalyst theory or he awarded them under the Consumer Legal Remedies Act or you awarded it under the private attorney general statute, he noted that they were a minor victor
31 min of audioOral argument — Paolini v. Albertsons, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 22, 2005
You're arguing that they really shouldn't have been acting here. Your Honor, I don't believe the Court needs to get to whether or not they should have been acting. … We gave him the period to exercise anything that had been vested, but not the ones that weren't vested. What was the normal vesting period? What was the normal vesting period?
59 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Fernandez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 5, 2008
And, of course, it's in that time period, when they don't do that, that all the interceptions that relate to my client are made. So as to my client, it's an absolutely critical period of time. … And that, Your Honor, is, for all practical purposes, since I'm hitting some up at this point, so much for my brief comment. Counsel, you have about a minute and 40 seconds. Do you want to reserve?
22 min of audioOral argument — Immersion Corporation v. HTC Corporation
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2016
And what HTC is suggesting is that the Congress in Section 120, sub salientio, overturned a century of settled Patent Act practice without any comment or without anyone noticing. … the 52 Act and after the 52 Act, sprang from the Supreme Court's decision in Godfrey v.
47 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Lance Stoddard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 3, 2009
He didn't admit that I knew within this period of time that the guns were in there. … There were some matcher striker plates and then went on to say that the hazmat people had to come in to clean the mess up.
18 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2010
And as a result, in a very simply short period of time... … Any comment? I tried to comment on that in the brief. I acknowledge it is a little bit confusing.
32 min of audioOral argument — Albert Malvino v. Paul Delluniversita
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 30, 2016
Which courts have said it does not survive since the Supreme Court decision in Pacific Air? There's only one northern district of Illinois case since the Pacific Air decision, Your Honor. … The statute borrowed heavily from the Clayton Act, Section 4 of the Clayton Act, which was trouble damages, and the Supreme Court already held in two decisions.
36 min of audioOral argument — Jamie Nevills v. Mart Independent School Di
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 29, 2014
So the comment about looking retarded had solely to do with the clothing that the students were wearing had nothing to do with any alleged disability. … As a matter of fact, when he was asked how he got the spray in his eyes while the students were cleaning their desks, A.N. told Mr.
42 min of audioOral argument — Ronald Engstrand v. Carolyn Colvin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 28, 2015
The vocational expert testified at hearing and case law seems to indicate clearly that anybody who has to take a break for any extended period of time and elevate their feet is not employable. … He did help with some shopping, laundry, and cleaning, but he also reported needing to rest on a daily basis, nap, put his feet up.
15 min of audioOral argument — Felix Prescott v. American Automobile Ass'n
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2017
It's not an accurate credit reporting act. It is a fair credit reporting act. Accuracy is one of the four values that this act is trying to protect. … to a clean slate, what if that had happened?
29 min of audioOral argument — In re Wedgewood Properties - Jeff Moyer v. Connie Rogers
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 22, 2025
in bad faith but you're all you're not acting in good faith but you're also not acting in good faith if you subjectively have knowledge of facts that would cause a reasonable person to say boy I think … periodic and and the cases seem to say that on the non-periodic garnishment it's all about actual notice basically whereas under the the separate I guess it's statute dealing with periodic notice it says
60 min of audioOral argument — ACLU of Nevada v. Fremont Street Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 1, 2006
From your comments, it sounds like that's the basis for why we think the appeal lies properly. … Clean it up. Go back on remit. You know, sort this out. We tried to.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Sullivan
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2008
We need to look at the financials for the gap period. And Mr. Mousseau then faxes Mr. … Well, Your Honor, I believe, and I'll just finish on this comment, that, again, the government has to act appropriately in presenting its evidence, and they have to meet the elements of the crimes.
40 min of audioOral argument — Shields v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 8, 2016
And then it goes on to say there are four types of evidence right here in comment B. Can I just ask? Yeah. … And so the government wanted a clean slate here. So when it finally reached a settlement with the Covell plaintiffs, it wrote broad releases, and those releases clearly encompassed the claims Ms.
31 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.