Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tennessee, By and Through the Tennessee General Assembly, et al., Petitioners v. Department of State, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 15, 2020

to Congress at 20 (January 31, 1993). 13 In SWANCC the Court rejected the Army Corp of Engineers’ use of their migratory bird rule to broaden its regulatory authority over isolated waters under the Clean … Water Act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Martin v. Howard University (No. 08-204)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2008

While amicus briefs were due September 16, 2008, counsel for Amici became ill and temporarily unable to complete the Brief in time to circulate it to the various Amici for comment and revisions. … In fact, Harrison’s letters expressly identified numerous women that he had targeted, over a period of years, to be his “wife.”

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, Petitioner v. David O'Connell

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 6, 2026

The period was characterized by sustained targeting of 6 Catholic institutions and traditions. … App. 242a (cleaned up). But that’s wrong. The USCCB is the episcopal conference of the Catholic Church in the United States. Pet. App. 197a.

Amicus Curiae Brief — CTS Corp. v. Dynamics Corp. of America

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

Lockheed Air Terminal Inc., 411 U.S. 624, 643 (1973) (Rehnquist, J., dissenting). … Rec. 24664 (1967)(Comments of sponsor, Senator Williams); S. Rep. No. 550, 90th Cong., Ist Sess. (1967)(Senate Report).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Al Odah v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

The Judicial Branch Has A Duty To Act As A Check On The Executive Branch, Even In Wartime. … RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF FOREIGN RELATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES § 206 comment b (1987).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Thompson v. Western States Medical Center

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2002

ASS’N 379 ..... 14 Memorandum for Ass’t Sec’y of the Army, Navy & Air Force from Ass’t Sec’y of Defense re: Tri-Service Pharmacy Policy Guidance (Jul. 26, 1995), available at http://www.tricare. … He commented that at the time of the tragedy, Secretary of Agriculture Henry Wallace “made excellent recommenda- tions as to the minimum requirements of legislation which should be enacted to prevent

Amicus Curiae Brief — Montanile v. Bd. of Trs. of the Nat'l Elevator Indus. Health Benefit Plan, 135 S. Ct. 1700 (2015) (No. 14-723)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2015

Neither Pe- titioner nor its amici dispute that for the period of time that Mr. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 91 (1983); Hamilton v. Air Jam., Ltd., 945 F.2d 74, 78 (3d Cir. 1991).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kristina Box, et al., Petitioners v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Jan 27, 2020

I went to work, and my mom needed to know my last period date, so she had my sister call and find out. They wouldn’t give it to her. … The other impact was just the thought of this abortion where it felt like a vacuum cleaner just cleaning you out.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Nike, Inc. v. Kasky

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2003

Moreover, music videos are aired on television not as advertisements but as the main attraction, the airing of which, consequently, is supported by commercial advertisements. … automobiles Americans are putting other Americans out of work, and that buying his company’s cars is a patriotic act.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Job Creators Network, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BST Holdings, LLC, et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Associated Builders and Contractors, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Word of God Fellowship, Inc., et al., Applicants v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. Pfizer, Inc.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Vornado Air Cir. Sys., 535 U.S. 826 (2002), vacating and remanding 13 Fed. Appx. 961 (2001); Festo Corp. v. … ; they could clear the air by suing for a judgment that would settle the conflict of interests.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Kahoot! AS, Petitioner v. Interstellar Inc., et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 16, 2026

Dec. 9, 2025) (cleaned up); In re Sandisk Techs., Inc., No. 2025-152, 2025 WL 3526507, at *1 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 9, 2025). This has created a circuit split with the D.C. … Cir. 1998) (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States v. Texas, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (No. 15-674)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

Air Regulatory Grp. v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. 2427, 2445 (2014). … ’ notice-and-comment safeguards.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Alaska, et al., Petitioners v. Alaska State Employees Association/American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 52, AFL-CIO

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Sep 29, 2023

Id. at 2486 (cleaned up). … An authorization will expire at the start of the first full pay period each fiscal year unless it was 5 2012 Mich. Pub. Act 349. 9 authorized or reauthorized during the previous fiscal year.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Weyerhaeuser Co. v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv., 139 S. Ct. 45 (2018) (No. 17-71)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2018

discretionary federal agency action subject to ESA Section 7 “consultation,” 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a\(2), the nexus between federal agency actions and private land use is exceedingly broad, and includes Clean … ) (“Any effective program for the conservation of endangered species demands that there be mer ge abe ne gene agen te mee ae habitat which i itical to th ival_ of 3 ag” (emphasis added). 14 any air

Amicus Curiae Brief — San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. Rodriguez

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

A State may take the step that California appears to be taking, of cleaning up the manner in which it distributes its revenues once they have been collected, but, unless it also cleans up the way in … One final comment. We have found in following these suits that many of them are outrageously expensive.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Bentkey Services, LLC, dba The Daily Wire, Applicant v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 28, 2021

MCP, *12 (Sutton, J., dissenting from denial of initial hearing en banc), citing Youngstown, 343 U.S. at 582 (cleaned up). Judicial review guards against decisions like Korematsu v. … Jacobson reasoned there was a “paramount necessity” for the community to act in “self-defense” to protect against the epidemic. 197 U.S. at 27.