Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.13s
Oral argument — Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 28, 2014
So they want to just clean it up, get this valuable condo and foreclose. … Let me just briefly address some of the comments of my brother.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jervis Davis
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 22, 2013
Her response about restitution was specifically tied to the court's comment during the sentencing that because there's no identifiable victim, restitution is waived. … Period. Can't all this be avoided by being specific? That would have been very nice had that happened. In fact, there was no agreement for that. There was no agreement.
32 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Yu Park
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 19, 2021
It really is not intended to replace a period of incarceration in the same way that the mandatory state supervision term at Cervantes did. And I mean, I think the courts now... … As Judge Hurdle has noted, this panel is not writing on a clean slate with respect to this issue.
24 min of audioOral argument — AIDS Healthcare Foundation v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 6, 2017
It's the activities of our client that will give rise to an inducement claim that they are seeking a declaratory judgment action to clear the air of that uncertainty of the inducement claim. … That's a comment that could apply to the Declaratory Judgment Act as a whole, and the Declaratory Judgment Act does not violate Article III. That's quite true, Your Honor.
29 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Jordan Rogers
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2017
And we know that because the government concedes that the definition of reckless can be found at 2A1.4 comment note 1 as, quote, and this is part of the definition, a situation in which the defendant was … But I think it's a different thing altogether when you have a helicopter that's flying thousands of feet in the air.
20 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2018
There's a specific provision that says if you are an officer, and you are a subcontractor, and you're in the construction industry, you're not an employee, period. … The job involved cleaning it off, pressure washing it, and then rolling on with a paint roller a sealer. That was part of what the jury considered.
27 min of audioOral argument — Jody Carr v. Stelzer
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 9, 2018
Stelzer first threatened him for contacting the ACLU, and then carried out their threat by acting with warden blades to twice house a next-win inmate who had previously broken his spine in a vicious attack … Again, I know that's disputed in the affidavits, but this needs to be cleaned up here. What it needs to be cleaned up is a jury trial. What did these guys say?
29 min of audioOral argument — Niki DaSilva v. State of Indiana
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2021
Always good to have clean glasses. Thank you, Your Honor. I don't think you'll have any disagreement from the judges of this panel. And they're not clean yet. All right, now Ms. Kauffman-Joseph. … And I'd also point out that the Indiana Tort Claims Act similarly is usually a suit against the state, although the party is named.
28 min of audioOral argument — Planned Parenthood Great North v. Commissioner of the Indiana St
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 9, 2025
Well, if a person who receives that information acts on it, correct? That's what you want to punish. … A bit ago, you were about ready to make a comment on that. At the very beginning, if I recall correctly.
36 min of audioOral argument — Turtle Island Restoration v. Dept of Commerce
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2005
There's a pre-regulatory process of notice and comment, et cetera, correct? Yes. So backing up from the 30 days, there's always going to be some period. … And if you look at all of those cases with respect to the Federal Aviation Administration, you will see that this court in particular does a lot of air court cases.
40 min of audioOral argument — People v. Alexander
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2024
Yes, the defense that no act of sexual penetration occurred. … The state and the court both read his comments that way. The defense didn't clarify it.
26 min of audioOral argument — Stolte v. Mission Care Services, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2010
I can't give you the exact time frame, but I know it was an extended period of time. I believe it was about seven minutes from when the wife told him that he needed the oxygen. … Stolte indicated that he wanted to sit up, that that generally means that he's not getting enough air. She did not say that he was not getting any air. She says he's not getting enough.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Ceja-Lopez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2004
I believe, because there were no objections to it, it has to be a plain air standard. … He committed a substantial step, and that's the Leo Smaldonado decision of this Court, that the act of crossing the borders is a substantial step toward the completion of the offense.
14 min of audioOral argument — John Carruth v. Robert Bentley
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 19, 2019
But isn't the law clear that even if they acted improperly, that doesn't denude their act as being an act that fell within their discretionary duty? … That comment is no different from a multitude of other comments that any appointing authority, whether it's the governor or the president, is going to make with a person that they're considering appointing
35 min of audioOral argument — Whalen v. Michael Stores Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2017
If it is implied that they would act reasonably, where have you pled anything that says that they did not act reasonably? … She didn't bring the claim in this interim period where there wasn't a canceled card. I'm not asking the question of whether she brought the claim.
36 min of audioOral argument — Foremost in Packaging v. Cold Chain
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 6, 2007
Friedman asked how it would be that if the top, I should say the bottom surface of the extending insulating block doesn't reach down inside the cavity, that the top, with the insulating block, would act … Schwartz's comments that in the actual GT container the extending block from the cover does not touch the cooling cavity. That's a hotly, hotly contested factual dispute.
35 min of audioOral argument — People v. Sinclair
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2016
So the time period we're talking about here is very limited. This isn't a situation where someone is pulled over and they're no longer driving. … That was air in this case under these particular very unique set of facts.
24 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Gutierrez-Cisneros
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 9, 2006
But also the government has not raised in its brief that this is plein air. So they've waived I think any plein air standard on that. I see I only have six seconds left. I will rise. … You can use specific specific acts of misconduct when they're relevant to show motive. Are we talking about 608B or are we talking about 404B? Pardon me, 404B. Yes, sir. I was talking about 608B.
20 min of audioOral argument — AEGIS Electric & Gas v. ECI Management LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2020
Their sole count is violation of the Georgia security deposit act, period. And that's that. The other reason why there's coverage under the statute itself is attorney's fees. … In this instance, when she moved out, they kept $60 of that money and were applying it for a cleaning.
30 min of audioOral argument — Mark Mayhew v. Town of Smyrna TN
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 25, 2017
Well, he had three and a half years of college experience and a long period of time of service in the United States. Close, but no cigar. … So is he acting as an employee when he sends the email to town officials, or is he acting as a private citizen when he sends an email to town officials?
44 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.