Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 11, 2015
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by July 13, 2015. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
80 FR 33223Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 15, 2024
The SIP revision contains a non-interference demonstration under the Clean Air Act (CAA), which concludes that converting the oxygenated gasoline program from a control measure to a contingency measure … Air Act Amendments of 1990.”
89 FR 82953Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 24, 2015
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What is the background of these SIP submissions? A. What state SIP submissions does this rulemaking address? … Michigan's plan for EGUs relied on the Clean Air Interstate Rule that has been recently superseded by the Cross State Air Pollution Rule to which Michigan EGU sources are also subject.
80 FR 36306Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 4, 1997
Act (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
62 FR 41905Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 21, 2001
We are approving the recision of local rules that no longer regulate permitting procedures and various emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
66 FR 27920Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 6, 2002
Statutory Provisions and Legal Authority Statutory authority for today's final rule is found in the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. , in particular, section 202 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 7521. … This rule is being promulgated under the administrative and procedural provisions of Clean Air Act section 307(d), 42 U.S.C. 7607(d).
67 FR 72818Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 2, 2001
The Clean Air Act (Act or CAA) requires the EPA to establish National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for certain air pollutants that cause or contribute to air pollution and are reasonably anticipated … Air Act.
66 FR 34864Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 11, 2018
The EPA is proposing this action pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Comments: Written comments must be received on or before November 13, 2018. … Air Act.
83 FR 51403Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 26, 2000
Both submittals request revisions to the enhanced Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) program, in accordance with the requirements of Section 110 of the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA) and section … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
65 FR 4210Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 20, 2015
The EPA is proposing to approve these revisions pursuant to sections 110 and 128 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments should be received on or before November 18, 2015. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
80 FR 63483Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California; California Mobile Source Regulations
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 27, 2018
The EPA is proposing to approve the SIP revision because the regulations meet the applicable requirements of the Clean Air Act. … Background Under the Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”), the EPA establishes national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) to protect public health and welfare.
83 FR 8403Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 22, 2004
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 3055Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 2, 2012
This revision was submitted to address the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and our rules that require States to prevent any future and remedy any existing man-made impairment of visibility … (a) The requirements of section 169A of the Clean Air Act are not met because the plan does not include approvable measures for meeting the requirements of 40 CFR 51.308(d)(3) and 51.308(e) for protection
77 FR 12770Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 7, 2010
The comment period for these proposed ADs is now typically 45 days, which is consistent with the comment period for domestic transport ADs. … for safety in air commerce.
75 FR 38947Transportation DepartmentFederal Aviation AdministrationFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 8, 2015
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
80 FR 76258Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 26, 2018
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 25, 2019. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
83 FR 66184Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 5, 2011
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or standards) and the 1997 fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) NAAQS. … All terms used in this part but not defined herein shall have the meaning given them in the Clean Air Act and in parts 51 and 60 of this chapter.
76 FR 491Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 5, 2000
The EPA is approving these revisions to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act. … The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
65 FR 53680Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 22, 2021
Sections 111 and 112 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) allow EPA to delegate authority to states for New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPs … Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations
86 FR 21254Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 20, 1997
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by April 21, 1997.
62 FR 13357Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.