Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.54s
Oral argument — Michael Muir v. DHS
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 14, 2025
The other thing I would say, this court has held that the 60-day time period is not jurisdictional in the Bonacci case. … But then you would have to go do a whole new case or you have to go try to travel again, try to go by air.
66 min of audioOral argument — Hani Nuure v. Robert Wilkinson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2021
If the act doesn't have a tendency to promote, sustain, and maintain the organization, then it doesn't fall under material support. … But the standard, we believe, is set out in ACM, which we believe is entitled to deference under Chevron Step 2, which is actually whether the act, if the act has a logical and reasonably foreseeable tendency
35 min of audioOral argument — Eid v. Alaska Airlines, Inc
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2008
An act is something that can jeopardize the good order or discipline of the aircraft. Going back to Article 8. … The courts have read into it the reasonableness standard because 44-902B says permissive refusal subject to regulations of the undersecretary, an air carrier, interstate air carrier, or foreign air carrier
55 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Kaleb Basey
Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 5, 2019
But the point is, from Teckle, is that merely commenting on the merits is not the same as a ruling on the merits. … Well, it's a long period. Though I would say that it's only 20... The first one, the length of the delay, that's just up to... in the air. So we're really looking at second consideration, right?
32 min of audioOral argument — Reyna v. City of Portland
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 5, 2007
That would be really nice and clean. All right. … And it was in that time period in November when Officer Stradley made the phone call to her.
41 min of audioOral argument — Tammy Skidmore v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 27, 2021
The whole impetus for the act was that rail transportation was getting squeezed and disadvantaged by newer modes of transportation or by highways, by trucking, by air, by shipping. … Your Honor, I would just suggest that that should have been a comment on the plaintiff, not on the district court.
66 min of audioOral argument — National Distribution Services v. DOT
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 20, 2016
The other piece, just a comment on that, is that under the statute and regulation, the out-of-service order has to be narrow, tailored to abate the hazard itself. … It was the unauthorized repair work that was being done before that tank had been cleaned and purged of flammable vapor.
36 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Roberto Rebolledo-Delgadillo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 6, 2016
Reading this thing, he was an accessory, period. Yes, Your Honor. And he was, and the jury was instructed on that theory of the case, and it was argued to the jury. … And, Your Honor, the government did try to clean that up through that course of questioning.
26 min of audioOral argument — BRC Rubber & Plastics, Incorpo v. Continental Carbon Company
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2018
So after the remand, why not just ask for leave to amend to clean up the complaint? … And if the court has no further questions for me, I will conclude my comments. Thank you, Counsel. Thank you. Mr. Gade? Thank you, Your Honor.
31 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Haggerty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 16, 2024
You would agree, believe it or not, that such an authority, and I think it's an authority, is the Motion Picture Association, which had input during the notice and comment period, disagrees with you and … That was their statement during the notice and comment period. If anybody has insight and expertise into this area, it would be the Motion Picture Association of America.
37 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 9, 2013
Land Company that I will comment on some of the judge's findings in regards to John Keck. … He transferred it into his corporation, Guaranteed Air Freight. We refer to it as GAF.
49 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Brock Purviance
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 27, 2010
Well, I'm basing my comments on the record. I have the same problem. I'm basing my comments on the record. … I just want to make a couple of comments in response.
23 min of audioOral argument — Lanahan Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Buenger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2010
Properly so, because the procedures of the Mechanics Lien Act was not followed. … My client, when he saw it, cleaned it up. Appropriately cleaned it up. It's not something that he caused. He's not somebody here that's trying to take advantage of someone.
38 min of audioOral argument — Grand Trunk Corporation v. STB
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 16, 2025
The customer says, you know, I'm in need of chlorine and we need this chlorine in order to provide clean water to the County of Los Angeles. … and after the staggers act.
45 min of audioOral argument — Jones v. Blanas
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2004
jail for the entire period. … Well, he complained about the conditions in which he was kept, that he didn't get enough clean clothes, that the temperature was very cold.
29 min of audioOral argument — Allstate Insurance Co. v. Alexander Yin
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 12, 2015
As I was indicating, we are not writing on a clean slate here. … If Richard had wanted to bring a case within the statutory period, arguing that his mother's Allstate agent acted negligently and not adding him to the policy, that would have been a different case, and
27 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Raul Flores-Hernandez
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2025
But there are lots of other defendants who were caught on those boats under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, the MDLEA. … He could have somebody who does the dishes, does the cooking, cleans the house. And that's normally not going to be enough.
55 min of audioOral argument — Weststar Revivor v. Navy
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 12, 2007
And the last page was denominated an air start demolition, and the table of contents of it was called. … What about in note 7 also, this comment just before the nominal slab size is 15 by 12 and a half feet, it says remove the concrete slab to extent of existing slab edges.
21 min of audioOral argument — Hispanic Housing v. Jones
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 12, 2013
Wasn't there like a 12-month probationary period? There was a 12-month probationary period written in on the form contract. So the form contract, number one, was there initially. … The 1.1 probationary period was written in on the top, but that 12-month probationary period is not defined. It doesn't say that it has any particular relevance to the enforceability of the contract.
27 min of audioOral argument — People v. Lloyd
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 14, 2012
And finally, in his brief, as he cites the legislative history, this was a clean-up amendment. The legislature revamped the sexual assault statutes back in 1983, and this was a clean-up amendment. … And it was within a short period of time of having revamped the statutes, they did this to clean it up. And it may have been because they included a section about...
49 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.