Documents

Oral argument — Adams v. Anheuser Busch Companies

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 1, 2013

Spitz, floor comments. Good afternoon. Okay, now we get to the arisicates. That's right. That's right, Your Honor. Yeah, I was bucking with excitement. I can tell by the look on your face. … Or did that just come out of the air somewhere? Well, I think there's two things. One is I do think some of it came out of air.

Oral argument — Northland Management & Construction, LLC v. City of Parkville

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 13, 2026

Melton was just a comment? And then you can proceed to tell me why you think Melton was or wasn't. … My client did a sunshine request and for a period of 10 years, no residential builder was ever required to obtain a 520 grading permit.

Oral argument — Nystrom v. Trex Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 3, 2006

I'd also like to comment on, this is not a precedent problem. This court is not going to be overwhelmed with cases like this. … If this court had given us an opportunity, there was a year and a half period when our initial decision came out, to the time when Phillips was decided.

Oral argument — United States v. Muller Vedrine

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 26, 2022

These are – we're talking about weeks in between these time periods. How – what is a reasonable time period? … And so in cases where the government perhaps acts unreasonably, of course, this court might find that there's a constitutional violation.

Oral argument — Stackhouse v. Royce Realty

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 1, 2012

She knows they have a policy to clean up debris and so on. The tree gets cleaned up. I'm sure she noticed. You notice your surroundings when you're out walking your dog. … And isn't it a little bit remote with the two-year period there? Well, there is a remote two-year period, but we're talking about at the beginning when this in 2006 when this conversation took place.

Oral argument — Lopez-Hernandez v. Terumo Puerto Rico LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2022

But when I look at the opinion granting summary judgment, there is no Local Rule 56 analysis, except for a footnote that says, accordance to Local Rule 56, the court only credits acts properly supported … And some of the comments were allegedly mentioned with Abigail Rodriguez there. She is the human resources professional, and Abigail Rodriguez also says that he didn't say those comments.

Oral argument — In the Matter of the Application of the County Treasurer and Peoria County Trustee for Tax Deeds v. Fleming

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2009

Go on and clean. Go on and play. Go on and clean your tanks. Go on and remove things. Go on and do some work. … The clerk will notice that we cited a case and it's also cited in the comments in 22-45.

Oral argument — Leon Brown, IV v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 3, 2022

the victim, that didn't make it into the Air Force memorandum. … Everyone agrees under Doneto that their All Wrets Act does apply to military courts to the extent that they have jurisdiction. We agree with them on that. Okay.

Oral argument — AEGIS Electric & Gas v. ECI Management LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 2, 2020

Their sole count is violation of the Georgia security deposit act, period. And that's that. The other reason why there's coverage under the statute itself is attorney's fees. … In this instance, when she moved out, they kept $60 of that money and were applying it for a cleaning.

Oral argument — Donald Wortman v. Amy Yang

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 21, 2017

And travel agents act exact as agents. … And as a matter of public policy under the Sherman Act, we are only going to allow direct purchasers to sue for damages. The indirects still have a Sherman Act claim for deductible damage.

Oral argument — Electric Power Supply v. FERC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 19, 2023

The notion of harmless air is agreement there's air, but that it's not going to ultimately change anything. … What's our take on harmless air? In other words, let's assume it was air to unilaterally act in this way, that this is closer to confessing air than it is supplemental authority, right?

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment, is basically what you're saying. I mean, I think that's right.

Oral argument — OPM v. Moulton

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 8, 2025

OPM's internal instructions, which OPM chose not to submit into the record, even after being ordered to do so by the acting clerk of the board. You say those are in the record? Oh, sorry. … We haven't changed our position, so we don't need notice and comment is basically what you're saying. I think that's right.

Oral argument — Air Transp. Assn of America v. WA Dept of Labor & Industries

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 17, 2020

This court's case in Korean Air, Judge Gould's opinion in Korean Air was about general state unfair competition law. … It didn't provide an alternative means for a carrier to argue that there was a violation of the Airline Deregulation Act or the Companion Act.

Oral argument — San Luis Obispo Coastkeeper v. County of San Luis Obispo

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 12, 2025

It was also a case involving the federal government and section 7 of the act which allows for consultation. … on this ongoing case and we're not going to comment on these work plans but the thing that's being overlooked is they added however we will comment when you provide your habitat conservation plan the

Oral argument — Sharif Mobley v. CIA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2015

However, the only comments that I can make on that are really basic. … time period was not set forth in days.

Oral argument — People v. Nowlan-McCue

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016

And that's why those comments were not erroneous. … And so those are my comments with respect to the second issue.

Oral argument — Prov Govt Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2009

First of all, because, as I say, the case is not about the government's acts. It's about the acts of the mining company. Secondly, these are the acts of President Marcos. … Do you wish to comment on that? Well, in Patterson, among other things, you did have state law claims alleged under Hawaii law. It's actually the same. I understand that.

Oral argument — Bates v. UPS

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 15, 2005

The district court ruled that UPS cannot do so and that its attempt to do so and its current policy in which it does so violates the Americans with Disabilities Act. … Does it mean, for example, that they – is it sufficient that they have a driver's license, that they're employed by UPS, basically, period, and everything else goes into defense?

Oral argument — O'Kane v. City of Chicago

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 19, 2018

So you're disputing that they just picked that out of thin air. They undoubtedly, without question, picked that out of thin air. … The man couldn't be more compliant over a 24-month period of time. When I would file his own job, he came in and testified on the world truthfully.