Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.28s
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2004
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 13272Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 27, 1995
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
60 FR 49814Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 11, 1998
Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
63 FR 11862Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; Illinois; Sulfur Dioxide
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 12, 2019
Air Act (CAA) for the 2010 sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). … Calpine argued that it cannot combust all of its distillate oil without violating its Clean Air Act Permit Program (CAAPP) permit that was reissued on October 16, 2014 (ID NO. 097200ABB, Application No
84 FR 27212Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Disapprovals; MS; Prong 4– 2008 Ozone, 2010 NO2, SO2, and 2012 PM2.5
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2016
Air Act (CAA or Act) infrastructure SIP requirements for the 2008 8-hour Ozone, 2010 1-hour Nitrogen Dioxide (NO 2 ), 2010 1-hour Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ), and 2012 annual Fine Particulate Matter … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 8 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
81 FR 15205Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 16, 1998
Air Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
63 FR 49517Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 15, 2007
We are proposing to approve these local rules under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by December 17, 2007. … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
72 FR 64179Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Washington
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 5, 1995
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements for the Puget Sound Carbon Monoxide Nonattainment Area. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. [[Page 22336]] DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by June 5, 1995.
60 FR 22335Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; SC: Multiple Revisions to Air Pollution Control Standards
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 16, 2017
These actions are being proposed pursuant to the Clean Air Act. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before September 15, 2017. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: August 4, 2017. V.
82 FR 38874Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 16, 2010
EPA has determined that these changes to the Texas SIP comply with the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act or CAA) and EPA regulations, are consistent with EPA policies, and will improve air quality. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 69909Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; VT; Infrastructure State Implementation Plan Requirements
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 30, 2017
With respect to Elements (C) and (J), EPA interprets the Clean Air Act to require each state to make an infrastructure SIP submission for a new or revised NAAQS that demonstrates that the air agency has … Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
82 FR 15671Environmental Protection AgencyAir Plan Approval; SC; NOX SIP Call and Removal of CAIR
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 5, 2020
Background Under Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I), which EPA has traditionally termed the good neighbor provision, states are required to address the interstate transport of air pollution … EPA also preliminarily concludes that South Carolina's monitoring regulations will not interfere with continued attainment of the NAAQS, RFP or any other applicable requirement of the Clean Air Act.
85 FR 26635Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 16, 1998
EPA will consider all public comments submitted during the public comment period. … Authority: This action is issued under the authority of section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 7412. Dated: December 8, 1998. David P.
63 FR 69251Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 15, 2010
The EPA proposes to approve these revisions pursuant to section 110 and part C of the Federal Clean Air Act (Act or CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 56027Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 30, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of NOx in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 19004Environmental Protection AgencyHigh-Temperature Forced-Air Treatments for Citrus
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 30, 1997
Clean Air Act requires that any substance identified as ozone depleting, including methyl bromide, be withdrawn from production, importation, and use in the United States by the year 2000.) … Moreover, unless special-use exemptions are attached to the Clean Air Act or another fumigation compound is approved to replace methyl bromide, the fumigating companies will soon no longer be able to fumigate
62 FR 67761Agriculture DepartmentAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; Consumer Products Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 13, 2009
Act. … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
74 FR 40804Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Ohio; General Provisions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2010
Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period; therefore, any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 25797Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Michigan
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 19, 1998
contaminant or water vapor, pursuant to section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. … USEPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
63 FR 27541Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 17, 2011
Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. … Air Act.” 74 FR 66496 (December 15, 2009). 4 “Interpretation of Regulations that Determine Pollutants Covered by Clean Air Act Permitting Programs.” 75 FR 17004 (April 2, 2010). 5
76 FR 35380Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.