Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Petitioners Brief — Petrelli v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1942
S., 24 F. (2nd) 399; Van Gorder v. U. S., 21 F. (2nd) 939; Isbell v. U. S., 227 F. 788. III. The proof does not follow the allegations. There is a variance between allegation and proof. … United States, 24 F. (2nd) (C. C. A. 8) 399, 1. e. 404.
317 U.S. 657Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Zachary S. Keeter, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · May 31, 2022
Wainwright 477 US 399, 91 LEd 2d 335, 106 SCT 2595 12 Hampton v. Mow Sun Wong 426 US 88, 48 LEd 2d 1495, 96 SCT 1895..10 Jenkins v. … At a hearing‘on October 24, 2019, the court revoked Keeter's bond and allowed the substitution of counsel.
Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis — Charles Chitat Ng, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis · Oct 24, 2022
Green ------------------------------------------------------------- 13 399 U.S. 149 (1970) Crawford v. Washington------------------------------------------------- 12, 13 541 U.S. 36 (2004) Deck v. … The jury returned guilty verdicts on February 24, 1999. 36 CT 12225-36 The penalty phase began on March 8, 1999; the jury returned a sentence of death on April 30, 1999. 40 CT 13235.
Reply Brief — Bath Mills, Inc. v. Odom
Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · 1948
C. 399; 191 S. … C. 160, 24S. E. (2d) 177, based on the decision of the Court in Sample v. Gulf Refining Co., 183 S. C. 399, 191 S.
335 U.S. 818Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Arensdorf v. Paulson (No. 09-169)
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2009
Septimus, 399 F. 3d at 611. C. … Septimus, 399 F. 3d at 611.
Amicus Brief — Scott v. Kentucky Parole Bd.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Brief · 1976
Eldridge, No. 74-204, decided February 24, 1976, slip op. 10. … United States Board of Parole, 399 F.2d 297 (C.A. 10).
429 U.S. 60Amicus Curiae Brief — Robert A. Rucho, et al., Appellants v. Common Cause, et al.
Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 8, 2019
Id. at 24 (alteration in original). … McConnell, The Redistricting Cases: Original Mistakes and Current Consequences, 24 Harv. J.L. & Pub.
Petitioners Brief — FCC v. Midwest Video Corp.
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Brief · 1979
i i aa a ac le 24 B. … FCC, 399 F.2d 65 (8th Cir. 1968) (406 U.S. at 659 n.17); 49 and Black Hills Video Corp. expressly rejected First Amendment challenges to those rules. 399 F.2d at 69.° For First Amendment purposes,
440 U.S. 689Opposition Brief — In Re Stanford
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2002
Tangel, Elbert Sanders, George Boller, at TE Ill, 399; TE VII, 942, 947; TE X, 1397). … Tangel, TE III, 399-401).
537 U.S. 968Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 12, 2025
Wilkie, 589 U.S. 399 (2020) i, ii, iv, vi, 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, 16, 23, 24, 26, 32, 34, 35, 37, …………………………………………………………..41 Bailey v. … (Id. at 13:19-24). If Dr.
Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Malinski v. New York
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1945
Y. 399, 400). … Section 399 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the State of New York.
324 U.S. 401IN THE MUSCOGEE (CREEK) NATION SUPREME COURT
Tribal code · Tribal code
Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953). … Martin, 375 U.S. 399 (1964); Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953).
Opposition — Cain v. Mazurkiewicz
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1979
- IN ORDER TO ROB HIM, IN THE COURSE OF THE ROBBERY AND IN THE PRESENCE OF PETITIONER, GLENN EDWARDS WAS FATALLY SHOT BY CAL- VIN WILLIAMS, ONE OF THE CONSPIRATORS, SOME TIME AFTER MIDNIGHT ON May 24 … FUNCTION, THE MATIHEWS HOLDING OFFENDS THE MOST BASIC PRINCIPLES OF FEDERALISM AS CLASSICALLY EXPRESSED BY Mr, Justice HoLmes IN Ms- SOURL, Kansas, AND Texas Raiway Co, v, Nay, 194 U.S, 267, 270, 24
440 U.S. 971Record and brief — Taylor v. Virginia
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1982
The officers asked the three men why they were parked @ 24 < there, but the men gave answers which the officers testified were unsatisfac- tory and evasive. … of crime was concealed in the auto. 399 U.S. 42, 46.
456 U.S. 906Supreme Court brief · Petition for a Writ of Certiorari · 1974
Local Union No, 399, 330 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. Ill. 1971). … Local Union No. 399, 330 F. Supp. 303 (S.D. Ill. 1971). 4.
415 U.S. 916Jurisdictional Statement — Eugene Holden v. Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Los Angeles
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1969
Property Search Warrants, 367 U.S:717, _ ‘81 S.Ct. 1708, 6 L.Bd.24 1127, .......... 4,5 Metzger v. Pearcy, 393 F.2d 202 ieee y seks ee 5,14 Mills v. … _ Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 86 S.Ct. 5 18, 5 L.Ed.2d 447. 4.
394 U.S. 102Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alfred Montgomery,III, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Feb 8, 2021
Ct. 399 (2018) ....................................................... passim United States v. … Ct. 399, 407 (2018) (summarizing the Iowa statute at issue in Mathis).
M & N Distributors; Dismissal of Proceeding
Federal Register · Notice · May 19, 2010
at 316; GXs 23 & 24. 2 Mr. … On May 24, 2003, Respondent reported to DEA that three days earlier, he had lost a case (144 bottles) of sixty-count Max Brand Two Way, a combination ephedrine product. GX 24.
75 FR 28063Justice DepartmentDrug Enforcement AdministrationPetition for Writ of Certiorari — Levin v. Parrillo
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1988
(Er 24 Vv. … Commission, 791 F.2d 1111, 1115 (3d Cir. 1986) 2.628 6 @2e 828 68° 82 8 2 6 24. 8.¢ 23 Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399 eoeoeveeeeee ee eee erereeeeee eee eeee 15 Paul _v.
488 U.S. 893motion to affirm — American Party of Idaho v. Evans
Supreme Court brief · motion to affirm · 1977
WILLIAMS, Idaho. 24, Cte ; ae ©, ie wy ON ; Seki, PETE CENARRUSA, ; r ! *. … Rev. 852 (1976) and 24 Kansas L. Rev. 345 (Part I) and 537 (Part II) (1976).
430 U.S. 912
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.