Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.56s
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida: Tampa Bay Area Maintenance Plan Update
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 29, 2004
This SIP revision satisfies the requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990 for the second 10-year update for the Tampa Bay area (Hillsborough and Pinellas Counties) 1-hour ozone maintenance … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
69 FR 16191Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New York
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 27, 1998
pollution pursuant to section 110(k)(6) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. … EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
63 FR 65567Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 8, 2016
by the comment period deadline identified. … orders, as required by the Clean Air Act, Section 128(a)(1).”
81 FR 78529Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Section 112(l) Program of Delegation; Minnesota
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2002
SUMMARY: In this document the EPA is proposing to approve a request from Minnesota for a partial delegation of the Federal air toxics program pursuant to section 112(l) of the Clean Air Act (Act). … EPA does not plan to institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
67 FR 48098Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Ventura County Air Pollution Control District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Apr 19, 2001
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
66 FR 20122Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Oct 19, 2000
EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time. … ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to David Conroy, Unit Manager, Air Quality Planning , Office of Ecosystem Protection (mail code CAQ), U.S.
65 FR 62657Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 26, 2013
EPA is proposing to approve a comprehensive emissions inventory that meets the Clean Air Act (CAA) requirement. … “General Preamble for the Interpretation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990”; (57 FR 13498, 13564, April 16, 1992).
78 FR 45135Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 9, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of NOx in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 4946Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 25, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 38682Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 15, 2019
Regional Haze Plans and Their Relationship With CAIR and CSAPR Section 169A(b)(2)(A) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) requires states to submit regional haze plans that contain such measures as may … Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2),” Memorandum from Stephen D.
84 FR 4407Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 29, 1999
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [NH-038-7165b; A-1-FRL-6445-3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; New Hampshire; Stage II Comparability and Clean Fuel Fleets … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
64 FR 52486Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 20, 2000
EPA is approving the revisions to Regulation No. 3 regarding criteria pollutants as part of Colorado's state implementation plan (SIP) under section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
65 FR 79790Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2004
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 43956Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 15, 2026
Regulatory Context The Clean Air Act (CAA or “Act”) requires the EPA to establish primary and secondary NAAQS for certain pervasive pollutants that “may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public … Air Act programs in Indian country.
91 FR 1732Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 7, 1995
These revisions respond to the requirements of section 182(b)(2) of the Federal Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA), for States to adopt RACT rules by November 15, 1992, for major VOC sources which … DATES: Comments on this proposed rule must be received in writing by April 6, 1995. ADDRESSES: Comments should be mailed to Guy R. Donaldson, Acting Chief, Air Planning Section (6T-AP), U.S.
60 FR 12519Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 6, 2026
EPA, Subject: “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2).” … Our proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period during which we received four comments.
91 FR 50742Environmental Protection AgencyRevisions to the California State Implementation Plan, South Coast Air Quality Management District
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 22, 2004
We are proposing to approve local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned.
69 FR 13272Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 27, 1995
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
60 FR 49814Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 11, 1998
Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
63 FR 11862Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · May 19, 2014
Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone and the 2010 Nitrogen Dioxide national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). … EPA elects to issue such guidance in order to assist states, as appropriate. 12 “Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP) Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and
79 FR 28659Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.