Documents

Oral argument — Smith v. Workers' Compensation Commission

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2011

I mean, if he's trying to fabricate something, he cleans up his history by that point. But, no, he goes in and tells the honest-to-God truth as he understands it. … We'll stand at recess for a short period.

Oral argument — Jones v. Sir Wash-A-Lot

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2010

Womack's comments that this case is exactly like Anderson v. Zemir because it is vastly different, and the facts that I've just pointed out are sufficient to distinguish this case from Zemir. … There's nothing else that shows any type of injury sufficient to cause that injury between the time period that we're talking about. All that's covered with his testimony. Thank you.

Oral argument — STALLWORTH v. SHINSEKI

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013

But to the extent that they did, it was not, it was not air. This court has said over and over again that it's a substance of a regulation, a substance of a requirement. Mr. … Is it your comment that in the paragraph we've been discussing in Andino, there is italics, but not of the word certifies? The italicized portion is review of all the evidence.

Oral argument — Anne Guthrie v. Coal Bed Services Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 6, 2025

Toxie was the acting supervisor that day. He pulls up in a company truck and says, hey, you're going to wash my truck next. … Williams' response to the plaintiffs' complaints of discrimination, when they called their acting supervisor, James Toxey, racist.

Oral argument — United States v. Hale

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 3, 2003

He gave a false name of Jude Johnson so that when the police ran him, it came back clean. … I think the officer is acting in good faith at that point based upon representations of what appears to be an honest citizen.

Oral argument — Mark W. Tetzlaff v. Educational Credit Management

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 22, 2015

Good faith only requires that a debtor perform certain acts, as case law has sufficiently defined as a matter of law. … You'd rather just start cleaning than make money.

Oral argument — Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Hamer

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 13, 2013

taxable period covered by the act shall invalidate any amnesty granted under this act. … It had no idea in the October to mid-November 2003 amnesty reporting period, and it would have been just picking a number out of the air and saying, okay, there's our estimate, you know, we'll pay it in

Oral argument — Paul Parker v. BNSF Railway Company

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 19, 2025

It's under the Whistleblower Protection Act. It's under the Office of Special Counsel. … In this case, under the FRSA, one of the protected activities is refusing to or refusing to not do like a safety act, and here he refused to stop conducting the air brake test.

Oral argument — Ashima James v. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 31, 2014

Then what happened is she actually went back to work for a period of time, was having difficulties, and went out again. … And your very first comment to Counsel for Liberty, I think, is probably the most salient comment that I could make right now, and that is it doesn't matter because if this is a comorbid situation, which

Oral argument — Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. Hoeper

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2013

The listener is TSA or a reasonable air safety official. … And it's not whether TSA would have acted differently.

Oral argument — United States v. Raul Flores-Hernandez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 15, 2025

But there are lots of other defendants who were caught on those boats under the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act, the MDLEA. … He could have somebody who does the dishes, does the cooking, cleans the house. And that's normally not going to be enough.

Oral argument — Care One at Madison Avenue v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 13, 2016

And so you do have comments about that seem like motivation-type comments. But isn't the motivation here clear? I don't really understand that argument. … Safe harbor seems dysfunctional, potentially, if we were looking at this on a clean slate, which I know we're not. Right.

Oral argument — Coons v. Secretary of Treasury

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 6, 2003

I believe it's in the fact that he, his doctor ordered him off of work for the period June until August, and he could not work during that period of time. … Off of that job for a temporary period, but that's not evidence that he could not work, period. He couldn't do that job for a limited period of time. Right.

Oral argument — Pina v. MSPB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2008

Typically, our cases, you know, intolerable working condition cases show a pattern of improper conduct by the agency over a period of time. … But the charges were inappropriate conduct in how he acted on March 22nd, and the charge was threatening- That wasn't my question.

Oral argument — Cohn v. Costco

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2003

And there's ample evidence in the record of all his efforts to do that, you know, accepting jobs that are essentially demotions, that are cuts in pay, cleaning up boxes. … We agree with Judge Burson's earlier comments about if there's any evidence that supports the verdict, it should be approved.

Oral argument — Durell Sims v. Secretary, Florida Department

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021

If you look at the rule that the prison had in place, it said prisoners can either be clean-shaven or wear a half-inch beard, and the rule permitted no exceptions. And so I think what Mr. … I'd like to start on preservation and our friends argue that there were attendant factual disputes that could have been aired at trial. But that's just not true under this court's be rich.

Oral argument — People v. Jones

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 7, 2023

So the court should reject the state's expansive view here and find that the exchange here, which was no objection, did not amount to waiver such that clean error should be available. … case, if you treat these two situations the same, then there's a real possibility that, that the doctrine of affirmative acquiescence applied when counsel says no objection, that could swallow the plain air

Oral argument — United States v. Jose Juarez-Santamaria

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 31, 2013

you sell these drugs and the defendant says no I didn't and then later the defendant asked for a new plea hearing and in his letter to the court he explained I didn't sell the drugs myself but I did acts … and followed along because counsel indicates that he had a seventh grade education but what he told the court was that he had an education equal to ten years in the United States and that he also did air

Oral argument — United States v. Richard Graham

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2020

Graham that you were acting in good faith, when the district court said you can't even ask Walker if he was acting in good faith. You can't say, Mr. Walker, did you tell Mr. … But those don't appear out of thin air, do they? I'm sorry, Your Honor? A lien doesn't appear out of thin air. Doesn't something have to precede it?

Oral argument — People v. McNulty

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 30, 2025

About three weeks later, the testimony was a little bit vague on the exact time period, she calls the law enforcement officer and says, I am now ready to make a statement. … Well, it does, Your Honor, because the whole point is you can't use specific act. I mean, specific act impeachment is prohibited in Illinois. That's the law.