Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.19s
Oral argument — David Burke v. County of Alameda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2009
That's between 91 and 182 different touches in a one-year period. Counsel, the point is not, in my opinion, whether the allocations are true. … Oh, the comment about Mother didn't ask for her child back. Mother doesn't have an obligation to know her constitutional rights.
33 min of audioOral argument — Paul Snitko v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 7, 2023
Open-air pharmaceutical exchange. I'm talking about the extensive illegal conduct that had been going on for a period of years. … So basically the agency was acting knowing that it had these supplemental instructions. It was not telling the officer who was issuing the warrant about what was the motivation, right?
42 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2017
The arbitrator, I wanted to point out, in his decision, he specifically credits the testimony of the deputy chief who's acting as the acting chief, Huffman, that keeping her on administrative duties would … For that period of time, she was restricted to administrative duties.
32 min of audioOral argument — Tice v. Dougherty
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 21, 2021
Those instances included comments on Facebook, which essentially called the sheriff's office staff fees for stealing campaign signs and comments made during a manhunt. … Although, ironically, nothing was apparently said to plaintiff during the 18 month period.
28 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Wesley Coonce, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 15, 2019
I'm asking you to comment outside of your argument. Right. I haven't studied your brief on this point, but if that's where you stopped, it's poorly argued. … Just a couple of other things I wanted to clean up. Mr. Valente said, well, you can't have both a cognitive disorder from brain damage and intellectual disability. And that's just not true.
56 min of audioOral argument — City of Decatur v. Ballinger
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 20, 2013
Rosewell that at least for the Revenue Act's indemnity fund for bona fide purchasers in good faith of properties at tax sales, the contract purchaser is considered an owner under that act. … Just a couple of comments I wanted to make. Justice Turner, you had mentioned something about any cases directly on point, and I don't believe there are any directly on point.
38 min of audioOral argument — Latrina Cothron v. White Castle System, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 14, 2021
Feldmeier also says that Illinois law on accrual is when there is a single overt act that the claim accrues and the limitations period begins to run on the date the defendant invaded the plaintiff's interest … But once that privacy right is invaded, as Rosenbach says, the privacy right vanishes into thin air.
32 min of audioOral argument — ProMOS Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2020
One, patentee sets forth a definition or acts as his own lexicographer. Two, that there is a disclaimer. And they've conceded that there is no disclaimer. … He did on recross and redirect, he tried to clean up that testimony. But if you actually look at the entirety of that testimony, it will show that Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — NAAAOM v. Charter Communications, Inc.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 9, 2018
You heard what I commented on before. … Yes, of course, any media company can choose the views that it wants to air, but that's not what this case is about.
34 min of audioOral argument — Maclean, III v. US DOF
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 13, 2007
But one thing, there are some comments in one of those articles where Mr. McClain makes allegations that he was, you know, forced out of the Navy because of his sexual preference. … So it was a period of he received two after three years and the rest after nine to ten years.
39 min of audioOral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020
I was actually looking to see if there might be an innocent explanation that is that maybe during some period during this five year period that the board didn't have a working majority, didn't have a quorum … This is maintaining chassis, changing tires, replacing belts, welding, cleaning the machinery, et cetera.
43 min of audioOral argument — In re: Rafael Tirado, Esq.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020
So why don't we begin with your opening statement, and then I'll have some comments after that. Okay. Thank you, Your Honor. … So I'm interested in understanding in this period of time from 2012 until the order to show cause issue.
43 min of audioOral argument — Gvmtof VIv.Lewis
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 26, 2010
The period of possession? The period of possession. … That period of time makes this different from Gray and Puello case.
27 min of audioOral argument — 20-2900_Kars4Kids v. America Can Cars For Kids
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021
But your comments to Judge Fuentes was you want treble. … And the other is on the Lanham Act.
91 min of audioOral argument — United States v. David Gibson
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 26, 2026
Or, and there were some comments, too, before Mr. Gibson decided to enter a guilty plea. … To clean up the record, there is no evidence that Gibson smoked or admitted to smoking methamphetamine the morning of. That is repeated throughout the record of this case.
33 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mario Giannini
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 21, 2024
Your Honor, those comments, these aren't comments just on the evidence itself. … So I think to assert that the handling by Judge Connelly somehow cleaned everything up, I think diminishes the importance of the right to cross-examination.
16 min of audioOral argument — Bark v. Lisa Northrop
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 2, 2015
But in their comments, they just listed everything that they'd like and say and or, and or, and or. … And I just cannot believe if this is BART's argument, and I'm not sure that it is, that absolutely nothing can be done that even for the shortest period of time causes some decline.
43 min of audioOral argument — Smith v. Workers' Compensation Commission
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 20, 2011
I mean, if he's trying to fabricate something, he cleans up his history by that point. But, no, he goes in and tells the honest-to-God truth as he understands it. … We'll stand at recess for a short period.
18 min of audioOral argument — Jones v. Sir Wash-A-Lot
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2010
Womack's comments that this case is exactly like Anderson v. Zemir because it is vastly different, and the facts that I've just pointed out are sufficient to distinguish this case from Zemir. … There's nothing else that shows any type of injury sufficient to cause that injury between the time period that we're talking about. All that's covered with his testimony. Thank you.
24 min of audioOral argument — STALLWORTH v. SHINSEKI
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 2, 2013
But to the extent that they did, it was not, it was not air. This court has said over and over again that it's a substance of a regulation, a substance of a requirement. Mr. … Is it your comment that in the paragraph we've been discussing in Andino, there is italics, but not of the word certifies? The italicized portion is review of all the evidence.
25 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.