Documents

Amicus Curiae Brief — Brenner v. Manson

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1966

, 1 Stat. 109 ....... cece ee eee ee eee eeee 9, 1a Act of 1793, 1 Stat. 318 .........e eee cece eee eees la Act of 1836, 5 Stat. 117 ........ cee ee eee eee cree ees 2a Act of 1870, 16 Stat. 198 .. … of April 10, 1790 down to the present Act) is collected.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Lenair Moses, Petitioner v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 20, 2022

By contrast, the Sentencing Reform Act permits Commission commentary by implication only, and it is not subject to congressional review or notice and comment. See Stinson, 508 U.S. at 41. … Stinson, 508 U.S. at 47 (cleaned up).

Amicus Curiae Brief — King v. Burwell, 135 S. Ct. 475 (2014) (No. 14-114)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2014

Taylor, 487 U.S. 326 (1988)............. 20 Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S. Ct. … Chevron, 467 U.S. at 842-43; see Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPA, 134 S.

Amicus Curiae Brief — TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Food Brands Grp. LLC., 137 S. Ct. 614 (2016) (No. 16-341)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2016

. 395,29 Stat.695 ........ 7-9, 23 Judiciary Act of 1789 (1789 Act), ch. 20,1 Stat.73..... 7-9 Patent Cases Pilot Program Act, Pub. … Laco, Venue in Patent Infringement Actions: Johnson Gas Fouls the Air, 25 Loy. L.A. L.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Food Marketing Institute, Petitioner v. Argus Leader Media, dba Argus Leader

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 14, 2018

Circuit [in Public Citizen] refers two years later in what has become a widely-cited – if purely dicta – comment regarding reputational harm.” … Air France Cargo (Certificate 57-T0109) . . . .”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 293 (2017) (No. 16-402)

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2017

Miller, Se a cstiecnecemnnstnnccccesssssveneess 3 CONSTITUTION I, Cee QU BY oscesiccncn .ctrccnivssrercneensng passim STATUTES a AIRES Sen 2, 12, 13, 14 OTHER AUTHORITIES Bank of America, U.S. … /my-likes-and-comments#2 (last visited Aug. 7, 2017) (“The person who posts something has 5 control over the audience who can see it.”).

Amicus Curiae Brief — PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2001

In Louie, the plaintiffs sought access to the restroom at a dry cleaning establishment. … United Air Lines, 527 U.S. 471, 484-486 (1999); 42 U.S.C. § 12101(aX(1).

Amicus Curiae Brief — Adams Fruit Co. v. Barrett

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 (1983) . Silver v. New York Stock Exchange, 373 US. 341 a ee ee rea United States v. … Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85, 95 (1983), and Malone v. White Motor Corp., 435 U.S. 497, 504 (1978).

Amicus Curiae Brief — United States, Petitioner v. Jonathan Skrmetti, Attorney General and Reporter for Tennessee, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Oct 15, 2024

Mohammed, 441 U.S. 380, 388 (1979) 21 (judgment that “a natural mother, absent special circumstances, bears a closer relationship with her child than a father does” (cleaned up)); Kirchberg v. … In the second category of sex-discrimination cases the government invariably loses, it acts in furtherance of what may well be a legitimate objective.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Sanchez-Llamas v. Oregon

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

Whatever the practice of this Court in the period before Erie R.R. v. … E.g., North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act of 1993, § 102(c) (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 3312(c)); Uruguay Round Agree- ments Act of 1994, § 102(c) (codified at 19 U.S.C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — BP p.l.c., et al., Petitioners v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 23, 2020

(cleaned up) (citing Thermtron, 423 U.S. at 354 (Rehnquist, J., dissenting)). … But, as Justice Scalia commented, “it is hard to imagine new statutory language accomplishing the desired result any more clearly than § 1447(d) already does.” Osborn v. Haley, 549 U.S. at 268-69. C.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Domino's Pizza, Inc. v. McDonald

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

Several years later, however, in Air Courier, the Court clarified that, in fact, a showing of intent to benefit the plaintiff is required. … There, the court held that §1981’s language “protects the right to enter into and preserve a contractual relationship, period.” Id. at 303.

Amicus Curiae Brief — EPA v. Mink

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1973

A leading commentator on the Freedom of Information Act has stated: “Courts that usually constitute themselves working partners with legislative bodies to produce sensible and desirable legislation … Cir. 1963), cert. den. 375 U.S. 896 (1963), required the Air Force, despite a claim of privi- lege, to produce “factual findings” included in a particular Air Force report dealing with an airplane crash

Amicus Curiae Brief — Hohn v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1998

That, however, i i §2244(d)(1)(C) cannot sensibly bear. ms = _ Like §2244(d)(1)(C), §2255 (as amended by the Act establishes a fling period for federal prisoners, which runs ip some cases from the … Yet by allowing such a claim to be advanced im a successive motion, §2255 rejects any clean constitutional/nonconstitutional basis of dntinntion.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Donald J. Trump, Petitioner v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., in His Official Capacity as District Attorney of the County of New York, et al.

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Mar 4, 2020

Periodicals commented. 2. Lesotho’s Thomas Thabane, prime minister since June 2017, was indicted on February 20, 2020. … Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 689 (1997) commented but neither rejected nor accepted the remark. 15 III.

Amicus Curiae Brief — American Railway & Airway Supervisors Ass'n v. Soo Line Railroad

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1990

Labor relations in the rail and air transportation industries are governed by the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. 151 et seg. (RLA or Act). … United Air Lines, 755 F.2d 94 (7th Cir. 1985); IAM v. Reeve Aleutian Airways, 469 F.2d 990 (9th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 411 U.S. 982 (1973). 17 the RLA.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Tennessee v. Herrington

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1987

The District Court’s determination that 2 As the State of Tennessee noted in its Petition, Senator McClure commented on the addition of 42 U.S.C. § 10161 (h) to the Act, directly, as follows: “Full … The Court found that there was neither statutory language nor specific legislative intent to define the term “stationary source” as used in the Clear Air Act Amendments of 1977, 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et

Amicus Curiae Brief — Students for Fair Admissions, Inc., Petitioner v. President and Fellows of Harvard College

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · May 3, 2022

Co., 427 U.S. 273 (1976) (holding race-based discrimination in employment violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964); Strauder v. … UNC Pet’rs App. 54 (cleaned up). But minimizing the presence of Asians and Asian Americans does not further this interest.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Pueblo of Santa Ana

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 1985

The analogy to § 12 of the Nonintercourse Act drawn by Francis Wilson, who drafted the language, does not Suggest a waiver of restraints on alienation for post-enactment periods. … Had Congress understood § 17 to have that effect, it surely would have commented upon its relationship to the later statutes.

Amicus Curiae Brief — Our Lady of Guadalupe School, Petitioner v. Agnes Morrissey-Berru

Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Feb 7, 2020

that a chacham – a wise man – is “appointed by the community to carry out specific functions such as judge, preacher, teacher, [and] religious authority on what is forbidden and permitted, unclean and clean … In 2004, the Fourth Circuit ruled that claims made by a kashruth supervisor against a Jewish nursing home under the Fair Labor Standards Act were barred by the ministerial exception in the federal law.