Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.32s
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 18, 2015
Act for the State of Missouri. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
80 FR 56422Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jan 11, 2017
This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 10, 2017. … Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) (70 FR 25162, May 12, 2005), the Cross State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) (76 FR 48208, August 8, 2011), and Maryland's Healthy Air Act (HAA).
82 FR 3233Environmental Protection AgencyTrade Regulation Rule on Care Labeling of Textile Wearing Apparel and Certain Piece Goods
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 23, 2020
comments: The Air Resources Board (451-70), Department of Toxic Substances Control (451-96). … Air Act as a hazardous air pollutant and a leading source of soil and drinking water contamination. 35 Two California government agencies 36 and a second environmental advocacy organization
85 FR 44485Federal Trade CommissionFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 31, 2015
The portions of the SIP revisions that EPA is approving are consistent with the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: July 22, 2015.
80 FR 45635Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Dec 30, 2011
• Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. C. Where can I get a copy of this document? … The authority for this proposed action is Clean Air Act Section 301(a).
76 FR 82234Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 7, 2007
SUMMARY: Section 172(c)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires areas that are not attaining a National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) to reduce emissions from existing sources by adopting, at … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
72 FR 31492Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida; Miscellaneous Changes
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Aug 12, 2015
EPA has preliminarily determined that Florida's May 1, 2015, SIP revision is approvable because it is consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act). … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time. Dated: July 30, 2015.
80 FR 48280Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 26, 2019
Missouri's submission indicated that the revisions made to 10 CSR 10-6.065 “include any revisions necessary to retain 112(l) approval under the Clean Air Act.” The John S. … Per MoDNR's request, we are approving these revisions under the authority of Clean Air Act (CAA) 112(l). VI. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
84 FR 30068Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 9, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of VOCs in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 4947Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 6, 1998
EPA is proposing approval of these revisions for the attainment of the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone under title I of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
63 FR 6143Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Nov 1, 1996
The intended effect of proposing approval of these rules is to regulate emissions of NOX in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
61 FR 56491Environmental Protection AgencyApproval of Revisions to the Tennessee State Implementation Plan Regarding Visibility
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 2, 1997
The intended effect of these revisions is to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the purpose of assuring visibility protection in mandatory Class I Federal areas. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
62 FR 35756Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 1, 2006
Air Act. … Air Act.
71 FR 5205Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Implementation Plan for Texas: Transportation Control Measures Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Jul 16, 2001
The EPA is proposing to approve this SIP revision under sections 110(k) and 182 of the Clean Air Act (the Act). … The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
66 FR 36963Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Illinois; NOX Budget Trading Program
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Mar 1, 2010
These sources are now subject to provisions in a newer set of approved Illinois rules that address EPA's Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR). … EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
75 FR 9146Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Jun 14, 2000
We are proposing to approve this SIP revision under sections 110(k) and 176 of the Clean Air Act. Additional information is available at the address indicated below. … EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
65 FR 37323Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of State Implementation Plans: Oregon RACT Rule
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · May 10, 2000
The SIP revision was submitted by the State to satisfy certain Federal Clean Air Act requirements for a SIP. … The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this time.
65 FR 30045Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 27, 1995
Air Act (CAA). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
60 FR 10533Environmental Protection AgencyApproval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; NSR Revisions
Federal Register · Proposed Rule · Feb 14, 1996
This revision establishes and requires the implementation of the Clean Air Act Amendments (CAAA) of 1990 with regard to New Source Review (NSR) in areas that have not attained the National Ambient Air … DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 15, 1996. ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Susan Studlien, Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
61 FR 5724Environmental Protection AgencyFederal Register · Proposed Rule · Sep 20, 2000
Air Act (CAA). … The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
65 FR 56856Environmental Protection Agency
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.