Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
1.30s
Oral argument — Jenny Flores v. William Barr
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 30, 2020
I only have a few comments in response to my opponent's comments. The first is that in terms of modifying the settlement, we do not believe that the district court's order does anything of the kind. … It's based upon the Trafficking Victims Protection Act, which vests children with a right to 240 removal proceedings, which are obviously being circumvented by way of these Title 42 expulsions.
48 min of audioOral argument — ProMOS Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2020
One, patentee sets forth a definition or acts as his own lexicographer. Two, that there is a disclaimer. And they've conceded that there is no disclaimer. … He did on recross and redirect, he tried to clean up that testimony. But if you actually look at the entirety of that testimony, it will show that Mr.
44 min of audioOral argument — People v. Verner
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2026
Under the Speedy Trial Act, the court can grant the state additional time beyond the 120-day speedy trial period to get results from DNA testing, but only if the state shows that it exercised due diligence … His conclusion that he made the statement when also he's saying that they're just there to clean up this fitness issue again, Mr.
33 min of audioOral argument — M. M. v. County of San Mateo
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 8, 2021
The state law claims were dismissed along with all the others, because if there's no force, there's no Bain Act violation and there's no battery. That's what the judge said. … And she, you know, to go to the other issues that were raised in the course of counsel's presentation, to move to beyond the takedown to the period on the floor.
33 min of audioOral argument — Gardner v. Martino
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2008
And that proposed amended complaint alleges the acts that you've just described? Yes, Your Honor. … And it sounds from counsel's comments this morning that they agree that that claim is no longer valid. Post-judgment.
55 min of audioOral argument — Int'l Bro of Teamsters v. Allegiant Air, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 2, 2015
Air, which was cited in the briefs 24F, 3rd, 1431, there the D.C. … And an additional consideration would be the SEC 10-K filings from Allegiant Air.
41 min of audioOral argument — Janet Brown v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 16, 2024
The air traffic control expert said that was a typical scenario. … She found that there was, that he acted reasonably, there's no nickel, no breach, and no causation.
51 min of audioOral argument — People v. Nowlan-McCue
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2016
And that's why those comments were not erroneous. … And so those are my comments with respect to the second issue.
32 min of audioOral argument — People v. Drake
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2025
At most, the defendant fired a gun in the air, not at anyone, but up in the air. That's the most that could be said about this. … Courts have routinely admitted evidence of acts of violence that are seven years old or older.
31 min of audioOral argument — California Chamber of Commerce v. Rob Bonta
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 12, 2022
applicable here where the district court judge stated at the hearing quote i don't want to go off on a review of scientific evidence here i don't know that there's a point in drawing my attention to specific acts … fryer case that case has been filed already your honor and so it was filed before the injunction was filed in the period when the injunction was stayed by the merit by the motions panels emergency stay
53 min of audioOral argument — MercerOutdoorAdvertising, LLCv. CityofHermitage,et.al
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 17, 2015
So they would be short in period of time for a specific event, as opposed to I think the cases where they were struck down, it was more general. So these are limited, and they're just signs, banners. … Could you comment on the district court's dismissal of the state claims that were dismissed with prejudice? That was wrong, wasn't it? I agree.
39 min of audioOral argument — IberiaBank v. Darryl Broussard
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 4, 2018
Broussard had acted without authorization. And lastly, the attorney's fees. … They never talked about the actual facts of this merger, where the IT director from Tesh said again and again, clean up your disk. I've cleaned up my disk.
41 min of audioOral argument — Village of Mundelin v. Garcia
Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 10, 2013
But because when Bush arrived at the park, he didn't see the defendant, we know that this 5-15 minute period that he spent looking around for him was a period of time during which the defendant was already … There's no accident, but the police officer, acting on a hunch, follows the vehicle for a reasonable period of time, sees no other evidence of impairment, no other traffic violations.
35 min of audioOral argument — Native Ecosystems Council v. Leanne Marten
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2017
That's a requirement under the Endangered Species Act. … That is sort of classic definition of arbitrary, when it's just a number that's sort of pulled out of thin air with no scientific basis.
28 min of audioOral argument — Brodowy v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 9, 2007
Because the GS system was still in effect for all the air traffic controllers. That's how they were paid. … I mean, in other words, if I come in and I say, I am entitled to be paid under the Magistrates' Special Benefits Act, because in a loose sense, I'm a magistrate, even though I'm a court of appeals judge
44 min of audioOral argument — Curtis Keller v. Kevin Genovese
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 8, 2023
So, you know, his key point, which strikes me as a good one, is fine, in the abstract, invited air, plain air, judicial stuff, those things are regularly enforced. … The period of time lapsed between the two. Is that what you're saying? It's not clear, Your Honor.
29 min of audioOral argument — People v. Hoskins
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 4, 2025
This court had said that there's no definition of an odor-proof container within the Cannabis Regulation Act. … I think a fair amount of reliance is placed on that comment, your honor. Okay. And you said common sense, right? Yes, your honor. Okay.
44 min of audioOral argument — Sierra Club v. FERC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 18, 2017
That defeats the whole purpose of the Sunshine Act. … And it looked at air emissions, including the higher incidence of asthma on African American communities, and said that there would be no significant effects and no violations of any of the relevant air
81 min of audioOral argument — STERN v. SEQUAL TECH
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 6, 2012
What we are pointing out is that making and selling an invention or a product is an act of infringement. You don't have to actually use it. … The counterclaim deals with just a discrete period of time. It does, and we disagreed with whether the patent had been properly reinstated.
35 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Mark Avery
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 15, 2025
If the court found that plain air review was the standard, we think it's de novo, however. … The knowledge instruction, essentially, the original instruction was, according to the record, an act is done knowingly if the defendant is aware of the act and does not act or fail to act through ignorance
30 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.