Documents

Oral argument — Rexing Quality Eggs v. Rembrandt Enterprises, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 3, 2019

I go out and buy a fancy vacuum cleaner, and it costs me some money to buy that because you're going to clean my house, and so I give the vacuum cleaner to you to use for cleaning my house. … But they were without the use of it during a period after the contract was over. It was only a one-year contract to begin with, right?

Oral argument — Anand Alexander v. Ralph Diaz

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 19, 2023

Could you address the same question that Judge Koh asked, which is a wonderful question, which is how long does somebody have to keep his nose clean before a court can conclude as a matter of law, on a … And the simple fact that an inmate committed a violent act in the past, especially a distant violent act, is not enough to give notice of a specific threat.

Oral argument — MGM Well Services v. Mega Lift

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2008

that thing which acts as a seal. … He clearly demonstrated that air and liquid could flow through the accused device. And yes, it was upside down.

Oral argument — Herbert E. Liverman v. City of Petersburg

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 27, 2016

The air of the court was then to say, but they're protected by qualified immunity or municipal liability. … And there is language from NTEU that says where you act pursuant to a ban that chills speech before it occurs.

Oral argument — ESSEX ELECTRO ENGINEERS v. United States

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 8, 2011

I'm saying I think that the standard for this case and all cases, protests, is whether they acted rationally, whether they abused discretion, whether they acted illegally. … Paragraph 3.418, air transportability. You have lifting tie-down ring test and an air transportability test that ties in with all of those. Isn't this whole argument somewhat circular, though?

Oral argument — People v. Peters

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 13, 2024

And as it relates to the final argument, one act, one crime, there was three offenses he was convicted of. You believe it only applies to the one? Yes, Your Honor. … That is as clean cut of invited error doctrine as you can have. Regardless of whether he was misadmonished before, the state did its duty. It attempted to cure this error.

Oral argument — People v. Merritt

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2017

I think still taking the court's comments in total show that the court was focused on deterrence and may have tried. . . In the motion to reconsider, it was trying to clean up a mistake. … is a threat, you know, and that the finding that it's likely to recur shows that the people do have to be protected from this person who has done this incredible amount of crimes within a very short period

Oral argument — United States v. Lewis (Graham)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 1, 2022

Having you having you bring a 2255 after the fact and then all of these issues can be properly aired under those circumstances. … Here, in that two-month period, the exact opposite happened.

Oral argument — D'Angelo v. Crofts

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 11, 2008

There's one other side comment in there, but that letter on its face says, from Richard Crofts to Mr. Gibson, we do not count any time you're a student for the 12-month waiting period. … I looked hard, and I can't find a clean statement of unconstitutionality or constitutionality. He moves straight to qualified immunity. Well, he does.

Oral argument — Sellman v. Aviation Training Consulting

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 23, 2024

Cox did not undertake his own examination of the facts and determined to act on non-renewal of the contract? … And that bias, with the comments, with the discipline. Who disciplined Sofgy?

Oral argument — United States v. Harold Dorman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2017

He cleaned it. He and his girlfriend were the ones that cleaned it when it was cleaned. There's no testimony that others were in and out of there. … You're acting like he was there guarding it all by the thing, and there isn't evidence that he was in that room day and night listening for anybody to come near his PCP.

Oral argument — Huber v. American Accounting Association

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 17, 2014

Our rule draws a very clean line. You have to file a certification, and that answers all of these questions. … It's sort of a grace period. It's a savings clause.

Oral argument — ASARCO v. Celanese Chemical Co.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 8, 2014

Could you address the statute limitation, the three-year statute, the three-year limitation period? … The three parties promised, and this was an enforceable promise by the district court, to clean up the site.

Oral argument — Norman v. Ingle

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

Give me one minute to clean up. Okay, Mr. Ford. Good morning. Morning. My name is Frank Ford. I'm representing Deputy Sutton. May it please the Court. … The court does not analyze the fact that—in fact, the court comments that Norman disputes that he assaulted Engle, even though that's clearly on the video.

Oral argument — Melissa Thomas v. Pawn America MN, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 14, 2023

Actually, they only had transactions with two of the defendants, but over a long period of time. … Well, first, I don't think the court pulled that test out of thin air. It's a test from Erdman. It's a test from other cases.

Oral argument — AVENTIS PHARMA v. HOSPIRA

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2012

If we assume that the references meet the but-for test, what's your reaction or what comments do you have with respect to intent? … So now moving on to – I want to address the inequitable comments, because there's some questions from – Well, can I ask about inequitable conduct then?

Oral argument — People v. Popoca-Garcia

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 20, 2021

So, would you comment on how when there is forfeiture, based upon the failure to object to preserve the air to allow what you claim to be inadmissible evidence that is prejudicial. … I cited about five or six cases where the court reverse based on plain air and outside a few because I haven't my notes.

Oral argument — Buchanan v. Allied Energy, LLC

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 10, 2015

There was, indeed there was not, Your Honor And this was over a period of time? … court correctly excluded the testimony of Bruce Stewart as hearsay And based on it not being usable as impeachment testimony for a prior inconsistent statement All right As worth noting Even if this were aired

Oral argument — Vanessa Robertson v. Wisconsin Department of Health

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 8, 2019

So these are all done in the context of also the daily slights, the comments of I'm going to do things the right way. … Robertson was the unofficial acting director. So yes, she would attend the meetings and talk, but then once Ms.

Oral argument — Joseph Construction Company v. The Board of Trustees of Governors State University

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 24, 2012

In this regard, as you know, or I think you know, you're writing on a rather clean slate. … The other thing, the final thing I guess I would say, although I know I've got a rebuttal period, is that I would ask this panel not to remand the case, not to remand this case just to allow the filing