Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.12s
Supreme Court brief · Appendices · 2005
U.S. Office Prods. … Mancari, 417 U.S. 535, 550-551.
Respondents Brief — Carson v. American Brands, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1981
American Brands, Inc., supra. 606 F.2d at 423. … Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., supra, 437 U.S. at 482 n.9. The District Court’s order did not impair petitioners’ ability to prove facts at trial which may have entitled them to injunctive relief.
450 U.S. 79Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Nov 25, 2024
Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (1989) .................... 3 Hudson v. Michigan, 335 U.S. 586 (2006) ............... 26 Jimerson v. Lewis, 94 F.4th 423 (5th Cir. 2024) ..... 22 Johnson v. … Madrid, 592 U.S. 306, 314 (2021). This rule made it possible for officers HALE, supra note 12, at 482 (bold added). L.B.
Jurisdictional Statement — Waller v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1980
Alderson, 324 U.S. 182, 185; Raley v. State of Ohio, 360 U.S. 423; Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange County, Florida, 368 U.S. 278. … Ohio, 482 U.S. 161 (1977), is misplaced.
446 U.S. 901Opposition Brief — Robert Ward Frazier, Petitioner v. California
Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Jan 15, 2025
McCoy, 584 U.S. at 423. … McCoy, 584 U.S. at 422-423. 12 Nor does the decision below conflict with Brown.
Opposition — Mollura v. Miller
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1980
Ag Pro, Inc., 425 U.S 273, 279-81 (1976). … Alexander Manufacturing Co., 423 F.2d 91, 92 (Sth Cir. 1970) require explicit Graham findings— this too is clearly wrong.
446 U.S. 918Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews
Federal Register · Notice · Jul 1, 2025
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), the U.S. … The U.S.
90 FR 28722Commerce DepartmentInternational Trade AdministrationRecord and brief — Frances E. Porcher, Etc. v. Mary E. Brown, Etc.
Supreme Court brief · Record and brief · 1983
Dept. of Employment Security, 423 U.S. … Collins, 482 U.S. 46, 54-55 (1977).
459 U.S. 1150Petition — Rhode Island v. Innis
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980
Toll Road Comm'n, 379 U.S. 487 (1965) 7 Lynumn Vv. Illinois, 372 U.S. 528 (1963) 9 Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 (1964) 7,9 Michigan v. Mosley, 423 U.S. 96 (1975) 8 Michigan v. … Mosley, 423 U.S. 96, 102 (1975).
446 U.S. 291Petition for Writ of Certiorari — William Dean Chapman, Petitioner v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Jun 15, 2018
United States, 423 F. 2d 526, 529 (4th Cir. 1970). & Order, pp.4-5). … United States, 423 F. 2d. 526, 529 (4th Cir. 1970)).
Opposition — Schott v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Commissioner, 511 F. 2d 618 (C.A. 5) (en banc), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 912; Levy v. United States, 535 F. 2d 47 (Ct. Cl.); Hakim v. … Commissioner, 511 F. 2d 618, 620 (C.A. 5) (en banc), certiorari denied, 423 U.S. 912. It is therefore respectfully submitted that the petition for a writ of certiorari should be denied. Wave H.
435 U.S. 915Petition for Writ of Certiorari — SSA Gulf, Inc. v. Magee
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 2005
Williams, 482 U.S. 386 (1987) ..~... 10 Chandris, Inc. v. Latsis, 515 U.S. 347 Bree 17 Circle Redmont, Inc. v. Mercer Transp. Co., 78 F. Supp. 2d 1316 (M.D. … Jenkins, 515 U.S. 70, 85 (1995) (quoting United - States v. Carver, 260 U.S. 482, 490 (1923)).
544 U.S. 904Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Shieh v. Kakita
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1996
Florida 482 U.S. 423 (1987) ........cccccccccccceces 36 Mitchum v. Foster 407 U.S. 225, 239, 92 S. Ct. 2151-2160 Gee 6 66 eSe send ebaescevecessoosé *eeee TrrvrTrririTir?;:: cit, Molloy v. … U.S. Constitution, Art. I, §10, Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423 (1987). D.
517 U.S. 1186Petition — Vincent v. Santiago
Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978
United States, 344 U.S. 414, 423 (1953). … James, 510 F.2d 546, 551 (5th Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 855 (1976) ; M.
436 U.S. 913Opposition — Chambers v. United States
Supreme Court brief · Opposition · 1978
Baumgarten, 517 F. 2d 1020, cert. denied, 423 U.S. 878 cirsccccccccsceseees 12 United States v. … Baumgarten, 517 F. 2d 1020, 1027-1030 (8th Cir.), cert, denied, 423 U.S. 878 (1975). 5.
439 U.S. 981Jurisdictional Statement — Dahlberg Electronics, Inc. v. Kievlan
Supreme Court brief · Jurisdictional Statement · 1978
Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 43 L.Ed. 2d 482, 95 S.Ct. 1200, rehearing denied 421 U.S. ‘971, 44 L.Ed.2d 463, 95 §.Ct. 1969 | Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. … Pursue, Ltd., 420 U.S. 592, 43 L.Ed.2d 482, 95 S.Ct. 1200, rehearing denied 421 U.S. 971, 44 L.Ed.2d 463, 95 S.Ct. 1969.
439 U.S. 978Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Alaniz v. McCotter
Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1986
U.S., 358 U.S. 307 (1959). … Id. 393 U.S. at 419.
479 U.S. 818Brief for the Respondent in Opposition — Commissioner v. Guardian Agency, Inc.
Supreme Court brief · Brief for the Respondent in Opposition · 1969
Harmel; 287 U.S. 103,.110; Lyeth v. Hoey, 305 U.S. 188, 194; Morgan v. … Commis- sioner, 302 U.S. 573, 578-579. The crucial question under Section 482 has nothing whatever to do with state law. .
396 U.S. 956UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
Court rules · Court rule
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF VERMONT ___________________________________________ In re: MODIFICATION OF THE LOCAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE IN THE U.S. … If, prior to the closing of a case, an individual debtor who has failed to timely file Official Form 423 a Certificate of Course Completion seeks to file Official Form 423 a Certificate of Course Completion
Petitioners Reply Brief — HARTZELL PROPELLER, INC. v. GAYNELL REYNO (Nos. 80-883, 80-848)
Supreme Court brief · Petitioners Reply Brief · 1981
Texaco, Inc., 521 F. 2d 448 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. denied, 423 U. S. 1052 (1976) .........seeeeee 2, 4, 5,6 Fitzgerald v. Texaco, Inc., 423 U. S. 1052 (1976) .......... 6 Fosen v. … See 28 U.S. C. § 1404(a) (1976).
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.