Documents

Oral argument — Ervine Davenport v. Duncan MacLaren

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 7, 2019

Two more jurors heard comments made by another juror to the effect that the shackling, that the defendant was restrained throughout the trial. … Yes, I believe there was testimony about that, and there was also some comment made, oh, didn't you see he was handcuffed or something like that.

Oral argument — Oregon Restaurant and Lodging v. Thomas Perez

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 10, 2015

But it went through notice and comment, correct? It went through notice and comment. So that would have been the time to say, look, the regs say what they say. … They would have taken notice and commented at the Labor Department.

Oral argument — Jessica Kampschroer v. Anoka County

Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 12, 2019

Celebrities in this period of time had plenty of information or suspicion that this was going on. Absolutely not, Your Honor. … What about was there evidence that she knew about a television show through her station and had presented some information on the air about something like this data access? Yes.

Oral argument — Shawn Riley v. Jolinda Waterman

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 18, 2024

Acting on her own, or was she acting in effect as McCardle's agent at that point? … Max or Air Bubble sold shoes.

Oral argument — Richard Stanford v. Home Depot U.S.A, Inc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 5, 2009

You have Article 3 standing, if you can show that the plaintiff lost time and income as a result of the fraudulent act. … I won't have that clear, clean, common, class-wide injury that I want.

Oral argument — ILWU v. NLRB

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2020

I was actually looking to see if there might be an innocent explanation that is that maybe during some period during this five year period that the board didn't have a working majority, didn't have a quorum … This is maintaining chassis, changing tires, replacing belts, welding, cleaning the machinery, et cetera.

Oral argument — In re: Rafael Tirado, Esq.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 16, 2020

So why don't we begin with your opening statement, and then I'll have some comments after that. Okay. Thank you, Your Honor. … So I'm interested in understanding in this period of time from 2012 until the order to show cause issue.

Oral argument — Bridge Aina Le'a, LLC v. State of Hawaii Land Use Comm.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Oct 21, 2019

Right, but I grant you there was nothing that required them, but by the same token can't be assumed to act arbitrarily. … They could have moved the air rights there and made it a substantial rate of return.

Oral argument — Forest Kirst v. Ottosen Propeller etc.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Aug 9, 2019

That's the comments by the FAA inspectors that that's what they found. … And as you can imagine, they don't have the capacity to keep records beyond the FAA required period.

Oral argument — Air Force v. Lockheed Martin

Oral argument · Oral argument · Apr 8, 2010

However, in this case, all we knew was that for some of the period of the F-22 contract, the costs would go up. We had no idea of any offsets from other contracts. … The Air Force then saying, we're going to reprice the contract.

Oral argument — United States v. Wi

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2018

Twenty-two of the— Predicate acts or overt acts? Overt acts, Your Honor. Overt acts are not necessary in a RICO conspiracy. … Your Honor, if you look at the affidavit by former counsel, and if you look at the comments made, if we look at the comments made by Judge Sheldon in the Niagara County court, it's clear that something

Oral argument — Florida East Coast Railway LLC v. Federal Railroad Administration (Consolidated with 24-11300, Texas & Northern Railroad Company v. Federal Railroad Administration, 24-11366, Association of American Railroads v. Federal Railroad Administration, 24-11367, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association v. Federal Railroad Administration, 24-11428, Indiana Rail Road Company v. Federal Administration, 24-11444, Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Federal Railroad Administration, 24-11445, Nebraska Central Railroad Company v. Federal Railroad Administration, and 24-12003, BNSF Railway Company v. Federal Railroad Administration)

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jun 3, 2025

I know they are currently looking at that issue, but to my knowledge, they have not actually acted on that. … I don't think they're outside that period, but I don't have the specifics.

Oral argument — John Sabo v. Megan Erickson

Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 8, 2022

It didn't include a period of incarceration. I mean, he violated, so then he was put in jail on a whole, but it didn't include a period of incarceration. … And it does not matter that other acts are also proximate causes of the ultimate violation or that some of those acts were taken by an actor who is absolutely immune, such as in this case, the sentencing

Oral argument — ProMOS Technologies, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 10, 2020

One, patentee sets forth a definition or acts as his own lexicographer. Two, that there is a disclaimer. And they've conceded that there is no disclaimer. … He did on recross and redirect, he tried to clean up that testimony. But if you actually look at the entirety of that testimony, it will show that Mr.

Oral argument — Alberto Mendoza-Ortega v. Matthew Whitaker

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 17, 2019

My name is Jonathan Robbins, and I'm here on behalf of the Acting Attorney General. Good morning to everyone. … A few things to clean up. One, on Bartolome, it is 904 F3rd at 813. It says 10% in the, in the terror context.

Oral argument — 20-2900_Kars4Kids v. America Can Cars For Kids

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 8, 2021

But your comments to Judge Fuentes was you want treble. … And the other is on the Lanham Act.

Oral argument — Garcia-Aranda v. Garland

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 20, 2022

government forces would be the person subjecting her to harm, she failed to demonstrate the harm she fears is committed by an entity the government is unable or unwilling to control, and therefore her cat clean … So it really it's this isn't someone who just happened to be there for a short period of time incurred uncontested testimony is one of the things that she talked about.

Oral argument — United States v. Cabello

Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 5, 2022

It is inconsequential, as courts applying both the common law and Section 2 have held, that Rosemond's acts did not advance each element of the offense. … or abetting he he assisted he knew what he was doing he may have had he may not have been a professional dope dealer or an experienced one but he knew what he was up to and as you point out with the comments

Oral argument — Peter Maldini v. Accenture LLP

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 3, 2023

It's a clean legal issue. And the whole point of 23 Act is to get the thing that I thought was a clean legal issue. … And the class period is from 2014 to 2018. But I thought you would argue that would be a reason for him to do it in this – The way he did it, Judge Graham.

Oral argument — People v. Bowman

Oral argument · Oral argument · May 8, 2012

You know, one of the things that you've responded to in your reply brief is the plain air issues that the state raised. … That's not a reckless act. That's a knowing act. But they rejected the idea that he was out there to kill her. He wasn't because attempt murder is specific.