Documents

Petition — Breitner v. Harris

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

U.S. … Continental Casualty Co., 508 F.2d 1298, 1302 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 914 (1975); Wright, Law of Federal Courts, § 58 at 267-71, 3rd ed. 1976; 1A Moore’s Federal Practice {| 10.307[2] at

Petition — Provenzano v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1980

Howell, 514 F.2d 710, 714 (Sth Cir.), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 914, 987 (1975); United States v. Baca, 494 F.2d 424, 428-29 (10th Cir. 1974); Ellis v. … Cir. 1974), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 (1976). Particularly in point is United States v.

Petition — Schott v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1977

Mississippi, 379 U.S. 443 (1965) 2... 17 Henry v. United States, 361 U.S. 98 (1959) 00. 22, 25 Herring v. … United States, 326 U.S. 607, 614 (1946).

Petition — Jay Norris, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Guide Against Deceptive Advertising of Guarantees, 16 CFR. 2197, All State Industries of North Carolina, Inc., 15 F.T.C. 465, 484-89 (1969), aff'd, 423 F.2d 423 (4th Cir ), cert: denied. 400 US. 828 … F.2d 423 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 828 (1970), Mutual Construction Co, Inc, et al. 87 F.T.C. 621 (1976).

Petition — Wireman v. Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

App. 588, 264 N.E.2d 423 CROTOP cs ch soveovese People v. District Court In and County of Larimer 103 Cal. Rptr 645, 27 Ca. 3d 193, 527 P.2d 50 SeeNS et cree te Tee People Ex rel Leonard v. … Janis 384 U.S. 1, 3, 16 L.Ed.2d U.S. 687, 75 L.Ed. 624 S.ct. (1932) , (1966).

Petition — Slidell Ford Tractor, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Pm RR ERS ee nr U.S. v. Arnold Schwinn & Co., 87 S.Ct. 1856, 388 U.S. 365, 186 L.Ed.2d 1249 (1967) Rem. II wns ca cdinnecéesatbadesatadbeteue U.S. v. … Box 13644 New Orleans, La. 70185 504/482-7861 JEANNE M. ROQUES ROBERT B. CHOPIN 711 Old Spanish Trail P. O.

Petition — Luis Garcia v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

GEORGIA, 429 U.S. 14, 58 “CE. … La Pointe (1981), 88 Ill. 2d 482; People v. Adkins (1968), 41 I. 2d 297.)

Petition — General Insurance Co. of America v. Oklahoma City Housing Authority

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Rowlev, 188 U.S. 620 (1903) ‘ wee A-7 (APPENDIX) and Brown v. Four-in-One Coal Co., 286 F. 512 (6th Cir. 1923), cert. denied, 262 U.S. 749 (1923). See also Metcalf v. … HAWKS CLERK, U.S.

Petition — ELLEDGE v. FLORIDA (No. 83-5463)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

Arkansas, 435 U.S. 475, 490-91 (1978). … Ohio, 438 U.S.586, 601 (1978), quoting Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280, 305 (1976).

Petition — Olmstead v. North Dakota

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 63 S.Ct. 1178, 87 L.Ed. 1028 (1943) ...... 10 Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 32 L.Ed. … Mississippi, 403 U.S. 212, 91 S.Ct. 1778, 29 L.Ed.2d 423 (1971)], and that this means that courts should avoid even an appearance of bias [Peters v.

Petition — Joseph Robert Spaziano v. Florida

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1982

, 397 U.S. 358 (1970). … United States, 412 U.S. 205(1973), and Beck v. Alabama, 447 U.S. (1980)." Id.

Petition — Briley v. Director of the Department of Corrections

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1983

Ohio, 403 U.S. 947 (1971); Harris v. Texas, 403 U.S. 947 (1971). … Illinois, 391 U.S. 510, 516 n.9 (1967); Boulden v. Holman, 394 U.S. 478, 482 (1969) (emphasis supplied).

Petition — Gordon v. Gordon

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Gibbons, Okl., 442 P.2d 482 (1968). A-8 [APPENDIX] fendant submits that the maternal preference for custody of young children denied him, as Danny’s father, equal protection of the laws. … Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 93 S.Ct. 1764, 36 L.Ed.2d 583 (1973) and Reed v. Reed, 404 U.S. 71, 92 S.Ct. 251, 30 L.Ed.2d 225 (1971).

Petition — Familia de Boom v. Arosa Mercantil, S. A.

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1981

Texaco, Inc., 521 F.2d 448 (2d Cir. 1975) cert. den., 423 U.S. 1052 (1976) ......... 10 Florida, State of v. Treasure Salvors, 621 F.2d 1340 oe fae PP Seere Teer er TT Eee 28,29 Fraley v. … See Judge Oakes’ dissent in Fitzgerald v Texaco, Inc., 521 F.2d 448, 455-50 n. 1 (2d Cir. 1975), cert. den. 423 U.S. 1052 (1976), terming a much less egregious limit on jurisdic- tion discovery a “Catch

Petition — LIPPER v. UNITED STATES (Nos. 78-638, 78-591, 769)

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

U.S., 390 U.S. 123, 88 S.Ct, 1620; and California v. Green, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930 (1970). … Crockett, 506 F.2d 759, 762 (5th Cir.), cert denied, 423 U.S. 824, 96 S.Ct. 37, 46 L.Ed.2d 40 (1975), nor so technical or ambiguous as to require a specific definition, A-32 see Evans v.

Petition — Dove v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

Swenson 397 U.S. 436 «2... cece eee eens 27 2. Chimel v. California 345 U.S. 752 ....0eeeeeeeee 43 NDMP w& 16. 17. Dunn v. United States 284 U.S. 390.......... 19 Di Re v. … S. 423 F. 2d 506 (9th Cir. 1970).

Petition — Lischko v. Galli

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1976

Warden, 87 Nev. 39, 482 P.2d 325 (1971). … United States, 9 Cir., 1972, 457 F.2d 1208, 1209, cert. denied, 409 U.S. 889; see Brubaker v. Dick- son, 9 Cir., 1962, 310 F.2d 30, 37, cert. denied, 1963, 372 U.S. 978.

Petition — Montemayor de la Paz v. United States

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1984

United States, 432 U.S. 137, 97 S.Ct. 2207 (1977). … United States, 482 U.S. 137, 97 S.Ct. 2207, 58 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977). 5 The defendant requested that the instruction be given to the jury. —~23— Even the trial court was confused regarding the con-

Petition — Walker v. Ohio

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

Texas, 381 U.S. 735 (1965); Sheppard v. Maxwell, 384 U.S. 333 (1966) and Irwin v. … Appling, a giant of a man weighing 260 pounds (T-482), was called but refused to be sworn or to testify (T-51).

Petition — Myers v. Illinois

Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1978

Chadwick, .... 0 U.S. 00 , 97 8. Ct. … Davis (9th Cir, 1973), 482 F.2d 893, 905, it is sufficient that the defendants relied upon the closed suitcases for privacy. The majority's reliance upon the decision in United States v.