Documents

Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.

10,000+ results

0.25s

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — National Archives and Records Admin. v. Favish

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    See Swidler & Berlin \ United States, 524 U.S. 399, 403 (1998). … Br. at 24-26. Congress has not created an exemption for relatives of the subject of government information, nor should this Court.

    541 U.S. 157
  • Appendix — Fostvedt v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Appendix · 1993

    United States, 929 F.24 1085, 1088 (Sth Cir. 1991). … Testan, 424 U.S. at 399; Ascot, 887 F.2d at 1027.

    507 U.S. 988
  • Opposition Brief — ZF Automotive US, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Luxshare, Ltd.

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · Oct 14, 2021

    Trunk, 573 U.S. 954 (2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 U.S. 392 (1970) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13, 14 Porter v. … No. 1-5 at 8 (¶ 24), No. 1-6 (¶ 9), No. 1-7 at 6 (¶ 17), 8 (¶ 20).

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — James Coddington, Petitioner v. Jim Farris, Warden

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Apr 2, 2021

    California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 (1967)—in which a conviction must be set aside unless the constitutional error “was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”—when considering claims of trial error in the context … Brown, 399 F.3d 972, 984 (9th Cir. 2005). 12 types of constitutional errors can subsequently be found harmless under Brecht. B.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Gilmore v. Gonzales (No. 06-211)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2006

    Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 462 (1966)........... 13 Gilmore v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 1125 (9th Cir. 2006) passim Gordon v. FBI, 390 F. Supp. 2d 897, 900 (N.D. Cal. 2004) 3 Hamdi v. … Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, 402 (1966) (concerning assessment of fees against a defendant) ("So here this 14 B.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2004

    Press 1995), by a nationally recognized land economist at Dartmouth. 24 Callies, The Taking Issue Revisited, 37 Land Use Law & Zoning Digest 6, 7 (July 1985). … Rev. 399, 463 [1988].) In a nutshell, overzealous rent control defeats its ostensible purpose.

    543 U.S. 874
  • Opposition Brief — City of Pocatello, Idaho v. Idaho (No. 08-135)

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 2008

    Utah, 510 U.S. 399 (1994) ..........-....006- 14 Howell v. Mississippi, 543 U.S. 440 (2005) ............ 14 Minnesota v. … Utah, 510 U.S. 399, 411-412 (1994); Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Kneip, 430 U.S. 584, 588 n.4 (1977).

  • Opposition Brief — Gas Spring Co. v. National Labor Relations Board

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1991

    R. 24(c). 9 2. a. A strike is an unfair labor practice strike “if an {employer’s}] unfair labor practices had anything to do with causing it.” NLRB v. … Crystal Springs Shirt Corp., 637 F.2d 399, 404 (Sth Cir. 1981). Accord Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. NLRB, 560 F.2d 403, 412 (9th Cir. 1977); NLRB v.

    498 U.S. 1084
  • Petition — Steelcase, Inc. v. Delwood Furniture Co.

    Supreme Court brief · Petition · 1979

    Balax, Inc., 421 F.2d 809, 812 (7th Cir. 1970) cert. den. 399 U.S. 911 PR ea ces Cuter Lie Lns cece ut woke, Pereckas 06 Carter Products vy. … JURISDICTION Appellant seeks review of the Fifth Circuit Opinion dated August 8, 1978, for which a Petition for Rehearing was denied and entered on October 24, 1978.

    440 U.S. 960
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Jenkins v. Indiana

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1994

    California, 399 U.S. 149, 90 S.Ct. 1930, 26 L.Ed.2d 489, (1970) ... 30 Maryland v. … The Trial Court 24 ruled such evidence inadmissable. (R. 7898).

    513 U.S. 812
  • Reply Brief — Steve Chabot, et al., Applicants v. Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Reply Brief · May 21, 2019

    Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) ......................................................................................................................8 New York v. … As the Applicants’ stay motion observes (at 24), no plan to date has been upheld under the district court’s test.

  • Brief for Fred a Seaton Secretary of the Interior in Opposition — McKenna v. Seaton

    Supreme Court brief · Brief for Fred a Seaton Secretary of the Interior in Opposition · 1958

    Petitioner Me- Kenna on January 24, 1955, tiled a protest against DeArmas’ application which Was rejected hy both the Bure aa of Land Management and by the Solicitor, act- ing for the Seéretary; the … App. 24) and ignered by petitioner.

    358 U.S. 835
  • Respondents Brief — New Prime Inc., Petitioner v. Dominic Oliveira

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · Jul 18, 2018

    Highway Dist., 151 Ark. 47, 235 S.W. 399, 401 (1921) (“The attorney for the district also filed his claim for services under his contract of employment with the commissioners, and the commissioners themselves … Supreme Court Renders Interesting Decision, The Grangeville Globe (Idaho), Oct. 24, 1912, at 5 (“contract of employment” of attorney to settle estate).

  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Josephine Tripodi, et al., Petitioners v. North Coventry Township, Pennsylvania

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · Dec 21, 2021

    P. 24 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 OTHER AUTHORITIES § 2956 Persons Bound by an Injunction or Restraining Order, 11A Fed. Prac. & Proc. … P. 24, delineating third party’s right to intervene), but courts have not addressed the intervening party’s obligations and liabilities once intervention is granted.

  • Opposition Brief — Risbeck v. Bond

    Supreme Court brief · Opposition Brief · 1995

    Pennsylvania, 382 U.S. 399, A oe ’ . . 2d 447, Sa, ee ae 2 eek 6k ds 24-25 Hynes v. Mayor of Oradell, 425 U.S. 61 0, 48 L.Ed. 243, ee Ee. ee ORE 17-18 N.A.A.C.P. v. Button, 371 U.S. … Giaccio oe lvania 382 U.S. 399, 402- , 450, 86 S.Ct. 518. G.

    514 U.S. 1110
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Louisiana, Appellant v. Phillip Callais, et al.

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · Dec 20, 2024

    Nos. 24-109, 24-110 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States _______________________ STATE OF LOUISIANA, Appellant, v. … Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 416 (2006) (plurality) (hereinafter LULAC).

  • Respondents Brief — NationsBank of North Carolina, N. A. v. Variable Annuity Life Insurance

    Supreme Court brief · Respondents Brief · 1994

    App. 16a (quoting Saxon, 399 F.2d at 1014). First Nat’l Bank v. … Saxon, 399 F.2d at 1014. That specific prohibition prevails over any general banking authority conferred by Sec- tion 24(7). See Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T.

    511 U.S. 1141
  • Amicus Curiae Brief — Jackson v. Perry (Nos. 05-276, 05-204, 05-254, 05-439)

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Henderson, 399 F. Supp. 2d at __, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38273, at *44. … ID sciccscnssosnaheiinstebisiesiieliidedialaitapuliinbihiaiptil 24 Henderson v. Perry, 399 F.Supp.2d 756, 758 GED. FU, AN covsnerovecctincoenciniatngtacetereuntionbines 4,5 Hopwood v.

  • Amicus Curiae Brief — League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry

    Supreme Court brief · Amicus Curiae Brief · 2005

    Henderson, 399 F. Supp. 2d at __, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38273, at *44. … MEN ONCE Soe GE A SNE ee emne 24 Henderson v. Perry, 399 F.Supp.2d 756, 758 GID FUR, AP ccnicnccstaiesencscinsinitinntinaranaiesnen 4,5 Hopwood v.

    546 U.S. 1074
  • Petition for Writ of Certiorari — Pennsylvania v. United States

    Supreme Court brief · Petition for Writ of Certiorari · 1974

    Ill. 1943), aff'd 320 U.S. 718: New Haven Inclusion Case, 399 U.S. 392, 429 (1970): In Re Missouri Pac. R. Co., 93 F. Supp. 852, 863 (E.D. Mo. 1950). … See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336(b) and 1398(b) ;* New Haven Inclusion Cases, 399 3.

    416 U.S. 938

Ask Donna what matters in the record.

She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.