Documents
Briefs, oral arguments, agency decisions and the Federal Register.
10,000+ results
0.85s
Oral argument — United States v. Charles Walker, Jr.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 11, 2022
The testimony that he was acting afraid came during the direct of the other employee. … So I understand that at least some of this may be under plein air. I would argue that not all of it should be viewed as plein air. There were, in fact, objections.
38 min of audioOral argument — SCA Hygiene Products Aktiebolag v. First Quality Baby Products, LLC
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 1, 2016
In Petrella, the Court reaffirmed the principle that when Congress enacts a limitations period, that courts may not apply the doctrine of laches to shorten the statutory period. … The legislative history of that Act reads like bleak house.
61 min of audioOral argument — Maria Sanchez v. Compania Mexicana De Aviacion
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 5, 2009
Quote, the price of the ticket may include taxes and fees, comma, which are imposed on the air transportation by government authorities, period. … And I would like to point out, Your Honor, that there are three cases involving the Airline Deregulation Act.
48 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Buntyn
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 21, 2024
Did he not know that that most people that they have to urinate within a 36 hour period? Well why the log does reflect that? … of time put them in a segregation cage denied them food water restroom breaks that other detainees received during those long periods of time he's the one that blasted detainees with hot air while they
27 min of audioOral argument — AVENTIS PHARMA v. HOSPIRA
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jan 9, 2012
If we assume that the references meet the but-for test, what's your reaction or what comments do you have with respect to intent? … So now moving on to – I want to address the inequitable comments, because there's some questions from – Well, can I ask about inequitable conduct then?
46 min of audioOral argument — Ashaheed v. Currington
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 14, 2021
Currington acted out of animus for Mr. Ashaheed's faith. As the facts are alleged, there is no legitimate inference that it was animus based on his religion? No, your honor. … It occurred as part of the whole, it wasn't a separate day later comment. This was part of the entire event. Yes, your honor.
38 min of audioOral argument — Robert Zucker v. City of Farmington Hills
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 10, 2015
He wanted to clean them up, he didn't want to get evicted. … Zucker under this circuit's standard for mental health seizures, but they acted reasonably under the circumstances.
30 min of audioOral argument — People v. Merritt
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 20, 2017
I think still taking the court's comments in total show that the court was focused on deterrence and may have tried. . . In the motion to reconsider, it was trying to clean up a mistake. … is a threat, you know, and that the finding that it's likely to recur shows that the people do have to be protected from this person who has done this incredible amount of crimes within a very short period
33 min of audioOral argument — ASSOC AMERICAN SCHOOL PAPER v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Dec 9, 2010
Horgan's comments. And a lot of the numbers here, this is a case about numbers, and a lot of the numbers are bracketed. … Any final comment? Final comment just regarding Eurodiff.
33 min of audioOral argument — Davis v. Hodgkiss
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 7, 2021
They would conduct some sort of exchange and stay for only a short period of time before leaving. Now, the officers associated with this with open-air drug sales from the residence. … The Supreme Court has stressed the need to identify a case where an officer acting under similar circumstances was held to have violated the Fourth Amendment, and plaintiffs cannot do that.
30 min of audioOral argument — Town of Hempstead v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · May 12, 2026
It is for causation generally, the comments or the evidence. Well, that ... You go back to the fundamental purpose of CERCLA, which was to clean up contaminated property without looking ... … The town focused on what its basic charge, or the water district's basic charge, is to provide clean water for its residents and to make sure its wells are not put down for an extended period of time.
45 min of audioOral argument — United States v. Pedro Alvarado
Oral argument · Oral argument · Sep 2, 2015
And so the issue, I think, the further you get away from, and the testimony also from my client and his brother is that they were firing in the air. … I know that, I'm aware my initial comment sounds rather strange, and I'm not saying in certain places, in certain places, you change the definition of self-defense.
35 min of audioOral argument — Indiana Public Retirement v. Pluralsight
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 23, 2022
claims, the Securities Act claims. … So why isn't that a sufficient allegation under the, not the Exchange Act, the Securities Act claims? So to plead a strong inference of cyanter, Your Honor, they must show a strong...
30 min of audioOral argument — Ferraro v. New York City Depar
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 2, 2018
Slippen, whom he had told himself years earlier of his disability, he made a comment to him that despite his medical condition, he had excellent attendance. … He didn't get regular working air conditioning. He claims he never got the portable air conditioner, you know, the window type of air conditioner. And he didn't get a phone.
22 min of audioOral argument — Turoff v. Republic Western Ins.
Oral argument · Oral argument · Mar 10, 2004
Turok himself had been a resident of the state of Arizona for some period of time. In March of 2001, he took a job in Texas, and at that point in time, maintained an apartment. … As I read the Act when I started my comments on this argument, 29 U.S.C. says an individual may not waive any right or claim under this chapter. That's what it has to deal with.
47 min of audioOral argument — Air Line Pilots Association v. Elaine Chao
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 23, 2018
Congress recognized that at the time that it passed the Act. The Department retained its power and the Department's exercised its power. … Article 17bis, I agree with probably what is implicit in your comment, which is we're facing an armada.
46 min of audioOral argument — Betty Denson v. Donald Gerteisen
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 21, 2023
Such use is marked by various acts of ownership and control, like maintaining a relatively continuous physical presence, performing routine cleaning and maintenance, altering furniture and decor, keeping … So, essentially, it is their home, albeit for a week, and which, again, Georgia law says in many of the cases there's no specific period through which a landlord-tenant relationship has to exist.
34 min of audioOral argument — Wanda Buckner v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours
Oral argument · Oral argument · Feb 7, 2007
So I think that that doesn't really require that much more comment. … But it goes further than the Rules of Decision Act. The Rules of Decision Act puts a period there, and the Price-Anderson goes on to say except where inconsistent with such section.
120 min of audioOral argument — Winder v. United States
Oral argument · Oral argument · Nov 4, 2025
So when he is doing that, he's acting as a representative of his faith. … They were Air Force parents. The child was born with cerebral palsy.
43 min of audioOral argument — David Burke v. County of Alameda
Oral argument · Oral argument · Jul 16, 2009
That's between 91 and 182 different touches in a one-year period. Counsel, the point is not, in my opinion, whether the allocations are true. … Oh, the comment about Mother didn't ask for her child back. Mother doesn't have an obligation to know her constitutional rights.
33 min of audio
Ask Donna what matters in the record.
She can read the source against your case and show you exactly where the answer came from.